Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of the British empire in India
The effects of the British empire in India
Secularism is the driving force of indian nationalism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of the British empire in India
The inception of the Hindu nationalist ideology was largely a result of India’s colonial history. While the movement was in many ways a reaction to the British presence, as well as the Christian missions that accompanied it, it had many aspects which were borrowed or inspired by the colonial rule itself. Concerned about the momentum of the Khilafat movement of the 1920’s, the hindu nationalists adopted strategies of stigmatization and emulation of groups that were perceived to be threats. Hindu nationalism remained active in India throughout the 1900’s, and was solidified by the publication of the Hindutva and were characterized by groups such as the Sang Parivar and the RSS. The success experienced by the BJP in the late 1990s can be explained by its effectiveness in creating coalitions, its strategies of gaining state-level support in contentious areas, and most prominently, the manipulation of ethno-religious vulnerability. All of these factors contributed mobilization of the hindu nationalist ideology, and the success, however brief, experienced by the BJP.
The success of the BJP in the 1980s and 1990s was largely due its ability to use a series of events to emphasize the vulnerability of the Hindu religion and identity, as well as its collaboration with the RSS and the VHP, which were integral to it’s mobilization and gaining of popular support. Events such as the Meenakshipuram conversions of 1981, where 300 low-caste Hindu families converted to Islam, caused anxiousness among many Hindus, and the Shah Bano case reinforced the perceived need for a homogeneously Hindu civil code. The RSS was able to utilize its old strategies of emulation and stigmatization to counter the internal threats posed by separatist sentiments amo...
... middle of paper ...
...he NDA, the INC proved itself adept at making new strategic alliances. With it’s focus on relevant social issues, “the INC emerged as the natural spokesman for the masses.” (2005, p. 249)
Jaffrelot concludes that the overall, the loss of popularity of the BJP can be explained by the lack of vulnerability of the Hindu identity and subsequent loss of interest in its nationalist agenda (which is not necessarily a movement toward secularism), and the weakness of its coalitions. Since ethno-religious mobilization has only been effective in India in times of unrest, the success of this type of aggressive strategy is largely reliant on the momentum of a driving issue such as building a temple in Ayodha. For years, the RSS has capitalized on the perceived threats to the Hindu majority; however, where no such fears exist, it is difficult to exploit them for political gain.
The relationship between cricket and politics is clearly delineated in South Asia from 1880 to 2005 through the easing of the stress between totally different caste members, although the stress mitigated wasn't forever from a religious aspect between the Pakistanis, Indians, and also the British. The various issues that arose in South Asia was largely class or caste systems (Docs 2, 3, 4), rivalry (Docs 1, 6, 10), and religious tensions (Docs 5, 7, 8, 9) against the various countries and cricket groups. Throughout its interaction with Indian politics from 1880 to 2005, cricket has served as both a unifying force between totally different political groups and also has divided political groups in periods of power struggle and political variations, as well as making sturdy bonds between countries.
Thousands of years ago, Indian society developed into a complex system based on different classes. This system was known as the Caste System. It separated Indians into different castes based on what class were born into. As thousands of years went by, this system grew larger and became further complex (Wadley 189). This system caused frustration for the Indian citizens because they were receiving inequality. Not only did the inequality and separation of the Indian society frustrate the citizens of India, but the imperialism Britain had upon them as well. In the early 20th century, Indian nationalists wanted to take a stand against the British rule and make India independent. The British created unfair laws that created a nationalist movement
In Nehru’s India, women were victims of a “passive revolution” that subtly advanced bourgeoisie men of higher castes under a guise of parliamentary democracy. Though women have presided over the Indian National Congress, served as a prime minister, and represent a large part of India’s la...
The traditional Hindu caste system remains one of the most controversial and debatable topics in the study of Hindu culture. The Hindu caste system describes the system of social stratification and social restrictions in which social classes are defined by specific hereditary groups. This caste system impacts much of Hindu history, society and culture to a level unknown anywhere else. However, the most apparent problem with this system is that under its strict rigidity, the lower castes were prevented from endeavoring to climb higher, and as such, economic progress was limited. It’s my assertion that a rigid system of structural inequality maintained through strict enforcement and social exclusion, is incompatible with a religion which claims to promote inclusion, peace and unity.
After WW2 Britten had been considerably weaken because of World War 2. The fighting also took an exhausting tool on them and on the military and financial recourses. They were so exhausted from the war that they did not resist much when a global independence move swept through the countries they colonized. While the colonized people had a new desire to fight for their independence the Europeans were to war-weary and had little desire to fight back. For years now India had been demanding self-rule from Britten, but as their wish drew closer so did the tension between the Muslim minorities in a land who’s majority was Hindu. Most of the leaders in India were Hindu and they wanted to involve both Muslims and Hindus into the Congress Party. But
India has a characteristic of more ethnic and religious groups than most countries in the world. Despite this multiplicity of religions, there exists a broad group of interrelated traditions called Hinduism. Although other religions within the nation such as Islam, Buddhism, and Christianity have occasionally challenged its dominance, Hinduism is the most prevalent religion in the South Asian region. Some of the outstanding differences between Hinduism and other denominatio...
In India, majority of Hindus lived with shortcomings of many kinds very happily throughout, as simplicity is the base of its culture. This is very evident when we see its country side temples that are very old and primitive. Hindus lived a contented life, learned the art of living from these serene backgrounds of life. Needless to say this feature has been easily manipulated due to its diversified and open kind of approach. Over the past this has happened and this has become a culture that anyone can do anything against what you called Hindu or its basic foundations. This was the experience of all Hindus in India irrespective of whether they are from any political backgrounds. Interestingly, other religions have thrived beautifully in this land without any sorts of hindrances. Communists stand for their ideologies, Islam stand for their own things and Christians are good in their own aspects. People who cannot understand the basic Hindu social fabric or has no learning capacity, patience or for social advantages has left this beautiful religion. To be a Hindu or to remain as a Hindu you need only three things guts, patience
India is the center of a very serious problem in the world today. It’s a very diverse place with people from many different religious backgrounds, who speak many different languages and come from many different regions. They are also separated economically. Two of the country’s religious sects, Muslims and Hindus, have been in conflict for hundreds of years. Their feelings of mistrust and hatred for each other are embedded in all those years and will not leave easily. What’s most disturbing is that there seems to be no plan for reconciliation available. There are numerous reasons for this conflict.
During the Cold War, many regional conflicts occurred and were noted as the significant battles which later led to decolonization. One of the regional conflicts were India and Pakistan fighting for their independence. In 1947, India was released under Great Britain’s control and gained its independence. However, the country was divided between Muslims and Hindus, which share different religions. Muslims wanted church and state to become unified while Hindus wanted a separation of these two establishments. Since these two ethnic groups disagreed, it was difficult to create a new government. Therefore, India was divided into two nations: India for the Hindus and Pakistan for the Muslims. Hindus and Muslims were racing to the border in order to get to their nation state which led to killing 500,000 people due to rioting. Although, Mohandas Gandhi, an Indian National Congressman, wanted to obtain peace between these two religions. Pakistan refused the H...
This book helps greatly in a true understanding of the Hindu social psychology and institutions. It is a comprehensive, systematic and integrated exposition of a very difficult subject.
There is a distinct difference between popular Indian nationalism, that is the nation believing in a state independent of Britain, and Indian nationalist movements, for example the Muslim League or the Hindu revivalist movement. These movements fought for independence but were far more religiously orientated and were fighting in their own interests. Although Indian nationalism initially found expression in the Mutiny of 1857, its deve...
Malik, Y. K. (1988). India: The Years of Indira Gandhi. The Netherlands: Brill Academic Pub .
The history of tribal oppression in India is an old one. “The Sanyasi Revolt”, “The Wahabi Movement”, and “The Naxalbari Rebellion”, are evidence of the tribal outcry that appropriately foregrounds their requirement for fundamental rights as citizens of the country. Even after sixty six years of independence, India’s rural poor and tribals are lamenting under the curbing effects of destitution, unemployment, undernourishment, illiteracy and human trafficking. For these people, the notions of liberty, equality and democracy have no meaning at all. Though the country is free from the bondage of foreign rule, their repression and prejudices still continue leaving them dependent on their new masters.
Many Indians feel that the Quit India Movement was one of the most influential and successful moments in history. The s...
The current manifestations of the caste system are now far more generalized across the Indian subcontinent than was the case in former times. Caste as we now recognize has been endangered, shaped and perpetuated by comparatively recent political and social developments. This is evident even i...