Miscommunication By Louis Manigault Summary

1478 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The relationship between slavery and freedom

Slaves had finally been set free by law, but unfortunately, the southern white citizens of America had a hard time accepting that. Carl Schurz, a reporter, asked southerners how they felt about emancipation, and they had no positive feedback. They believed negroes were lazy and would do society no benefit without slavery. Louis Manigault, a land owner, witnessed something different after his return to his plantation. He saw a team working to keep his plantation running. The views of southern whites and Manigault had a huge difference, some people could accept change. Sadly, neither of these cases reveal freedom to their workers, and that is when the newly emancipated slaves stepped up and try to find freedom for themselves. Carl Schurz was an …show more content…

They were very happy to be greeted by name by Manigault. Manigault, wrote he joked around with them and they were asking him questions about his return.5 No matter what condition these workers were in they still had respect towards their boss. However, in the Georgian man case, he seemed disrespectful and unfair to his workers. All in all, if you give respect you earn respect. In Louis Manigault last days at the plantation he spoke to General Harrison about how employment worked now. General Harrison suggested him a plan to rent out his land to the workers and have each of them in charge of their own section, like a manager. Manigault agreed and said it was a good idea. This is a huge difference from Schurz reports, because people believed the negroes would not work without abuse, but Manigault’s slaves did work while he abandoned the plantation and slaves. Which was a good reason for him to trust these people will do a good job of preserving his

Show More
Related

  • Jackson vs. McClellan

    1441 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though McClellan wasn’t very good at letting his men go and making decisions, he was great at bringing the men’s spirits up when they were down. Every man under his command loved and cherished George B. McClellan. Stonewall was also respected by his men but not loved like McClellan. The name Stonewall Jackson put fear into the hearts of the Union soldiers, and he was respected for that.

    Read More

  • Paul Finkelman Defending Slavery Summary

    1545 Words  | 4 Pages

    The North had a very different opinion of the American way and made it exceedingly clear with the formation of numerous abolition societies, effectively abolishing slavery across the northern region and allowing blacks to live as productive members society, rather than its the property. Even one of the most prominent slave holders of that time was forced to rethink the legitimacy of slavery. “Seeing free black soldiers in action undermined [George] Washington’s racial prejudice and ultimately his support for slavery itself” (Finkelman 18). The productivity, societal and political benefits, and military empowerment made available by freed slaves challenged the South’s sense of racial supremacy, thus they began to establish a defense against the complete abolition of

    Read More

  • Reaping the Whirlwind: The Civil Rights Movement in Tuskegee

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...skegee Institute at that time, thought it was a great idea to because it would afford much professional opportunities for blacks in Macon County. Moton wanted an all black administration but would settle for a white chief administrator if he were of northern origin. Both money and power were the issues in the Veterans Administration hospital controversy. A white man who said pointed out another issue, "if niggers are put at the head of this hospital, they'll be responsible only to the United States and we don't want and we don't want any niggers in Alabama we can't control." (p. 28). Thus saying that whatever blacks do whites should have some kind of control in essence is still a form of slavery.

    Read More

  • Reconstruction Dbq Essay

    771 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the combination of the above mentioned, the freedmen had many basic rights stripped away from them. They couldn’t vote, were killed and preyed upon mercilessly and many other terrible matters. White Southern Democrats took advantage of their over whelming power in Congress and didn’t pass rights to protect the freedmen; groups such as the KKK and White Leagues intimidated and killed freedmen and those who supported them; and Congress didn’t have a plan for the slaves when they freed them. With all of these events together, the freedmen had far from equal rights. They were ‘separate but equal’. With the mixture of these incidents, the consequence was that Congress ultimately failed in their efforts to provide equal rights for freedmen.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Summary: George Fitzhugh Advocates Slavery

    495 Words  | 1 Pages

    In his work “James Henry Hammond Advocates Slavery” he compares the southern slaves and northern slaves of this timer. He believed that the southern slaves were happiest because when they were purchased it was for life and their masters would provide them with everything they needed to survive. Unlike those in the north these slaves would never have to experience starvation, begging, or the search for employment. In the North slaves were bought for a short time period or day by day, they aren’t cared for properly which results in them experiencing tremendous pain. Hammond also criticized the North for allowing their slaves to vote. He believed that it would only cause harm if the slaves ever had the power to overpowering

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Reconstruction And Reconstruction

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the Union victory in the Civil War, the South was still bitter and needed vast societal changes that matched those in the North. Reconstruction efforts were made to to make the regions more similar socially, politically, and economically; because despite the fact that they were on nation, the two societies were very different. There were still unresolved issues in regards to the status of former slaves and what system of labor should replace slavery. After the Union’s victory in the Civil War, reform efforts were made during the Reconstruction era to reunite the North and South and make ideas in the South more similar to those in the North; but this failed because of the South’s preconcieved ideas towards race.

    Read More

  • Was The Reconstruction A Success Or A Failure

    957 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was 1865, black men were tasting freedom, the confederation was defeated, the south was defeated but the unchained blacks had no real freedom. "A man maybe free and yet not independent," Mississippi planter Sammuel Agnew observed in his diary (Foner 481). This same year General Sherman issued the Special Field Order 15, in attempt to provide land for the ex-slaves. There was 40 acres of land and a mule waiting for the emancipated slaves, this gave hope for an economic development among blacks' communities. The Special Field Order 15 put all the land under federal control acquired by the government during the war to use for the homestead of the blacks. Even thought the offer of land some slave fled ...

    Read More

  • Southern Pro-Slavery Rhetoric

    1613 Words  | 4 Pages

    As the abolition movement picked up, southerners became organized in their support of slavery in what became known as the proslavery movement. Some southerners involved in the movement maintained the position that slavery was like "the law of nature" which allowed the strong to rule the weak. Thus is was appropriate for whites to own blacks as slaves because they believed whites were the dominant race. Some supporters of slavery believed that the Bible clearly condoned the practice of slavery. Still others argue that southern slaves were provided with lifelong homes and better living conditions than they would have experienced living in Africa. By 1860, almost all southerners thought slavery should continue.

    Read More

  • How The Civil War Became A War To Free The Slaves

    1389 Words  | 3 Pages

    In congruence with President Lincoln’s statements regarding the differentiation between fighting the confederates and ending slavery, Union officers upheld slaveholders constitutionally guaranteed right to own slaves. They continually reassured slave holders in loyal boarder states that the Union would not be fighting against the institution of slavery and any runaway slaves would be returned. This policy was strictly followed by most generals and many runaway slaves were returned to their masters to face punishment or death. Despite this danger, slaves continued to run away and enter Union lines. As this persisted, many Union officers were forced to reconsider the official policy of their superiors. General Benjamin F. Butler was one of the first to break the trend, providing food and shelter to slaves who had previously worked for the Confederacy, and ultimately putting the able-bodied men to work. He justified his actions...

    Read More

  • Primary Sources Of Reconstruction Essay

    1214 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first primary source I chose was a report on the conditions of the south. In 1865, Carl Schurz was sent to investigate the conditions of the south after the Civil War had ended. He spoke to many people to find out what their thoughts on emancipation was and what he found was that many white people were furious at the thought of former slaves being able to have freedom and the same equal rights as them. What I found to be quite interesting about this primary source were the thoughts and comments white men had towards the slaves, they were completely against the federal government and their decisions towards slavery. Schurz mentions how white men said slaves were only useful in the sense of “hard working labor” and nothing more, therefore were meant to be in the fields working not having rights and being seen as equal. A large majority of people that Schurz came into contact with belonged to the more higher intelligent class, in which this case were against the thought of slaves becoming free.

    Read More

  • The Reconstruction-Era

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the Civil War, many of the ex-slaves moved away from their masters with their families in hopes of owning their own land, but very few found success. Many of the slaves found that they had a harder time being free than they did during slavery. The African-Americans now had to fend for themselves but most lacked the money, land, and jobs to do so. Some of the ex-slaves decided to stay and work for their masters for money, food, and shelter, but many were not fortunate enough to have that option. Many African-Americans died because they could not support themselves or their families on their own. The ex-slaveowners were also in a bad position at this point because they lack the manpower to manage their land. Henry William Ravenel, a former slaveowner, stated "Our Finances are in such a condition that universal discontent and real suffering exists (Firsthand 21)." ...

    Read More

  • The Reconstruction Period Of The Civil War

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    Chapter sixteen begins with the reconstruction period of the civil war. From previous history classes I have learned more in depth about the war and why the North was fighting against the South, but overall I think the most important part to look at from the civil war is the end of it and what was to come after it, which was the reconstruction era. Lincoln had just released his emancipation proclamation and freed the slaves. As happy as this may seem it was actually quite the opposite. Attitudes of white southerners towards black in the south hadn 't changed a bit after the Emancipation Proclamation. In 1865 Carl Schurz was sent by President Andrew Johnson to investigate the current conditions of the confederacy after they were defeated in the civil war. While there he shared in his “Report on the Condition of the South” that southerners have a belief “so deeply rooted… that the negro will not work without physical compulsion”. Overall this just shows how the attitudes of white southerners were no different. They truly believed that the blacks weren 't able to work or function without force. Many northerners and abolitionists, such as Wendell Phillips, at this time saw this and actually said that Lincoln didn 't do enough. They wanted him to do a complete overhaul of southern society. Personally I understand where these people were coming from. They were people who really wanted all the issues to be resolved. Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was a step in the right direction, but he could have done more. Schurz even noted that “negroes who walked away from the plantations, or were found upon the roads, were shot or otherwise severely punished”. Former slaves weren ...

    Read More

  • Booker T. Washington

    1862 Words  | 4 Pages

    Slavery was abolished and many southerners had a problem with that. To many whites, black people didn't deserve and weren't intellectually "ready" for such freedom. The South had such a hard time accepting it that Union troops were stationed in southern states who couldn't cooperate. Booker T. Washington is a prime example to southerners who think that blacks can amount to nothing. In my paper, I will talk to you about the many accomplishments he has made and the hardships that were attached to his achievements.

    Read More

  • Abolishing Slavery in America

    1262 Words  | 3 Pages

    When President Lincoln and Congress proposed the removal of slavery, many in the South became upset by this. After all, who was a white northerner to tell a southern plantation owner what he can and cannot do on his land hundreds of miles away? The North did not understand how important slavery was to the Southern economy. The removal of slavery would soon destroy the South’... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Miscommunication

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    Problems in every society usually derive from one specific thing. Miscommunication. How many times have you gotten in an argument or a disagreement with someone over what someone said, and then you later found out that that person meant something completely different from what was running through your head? How many times have you gotten off the phone with someone—someone important, --and wondered, what in the world were he or she talking about? I often get this feeling after class.

    Read More

More about Miscommunication By Louis Manigault Summary

Open Document