Michael M. V.

585 Words2 Pages

In the case Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, the petitioner, Michael M., was charged with statutory rape in the state of California. He then claimed the state’s statute unconstitutionally discriminated against him because he was male. At the time, Michael M. had sex with a 16-year-old girl while he was 17. The young girl was not condemned. He claimed the law violated the Equal Protection Clause stated in the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution. This clause says every state has to grant everyone the same rights and conditions as every citizen. The question is, does the statutory rape statute of California violate the Equal Protection Clause?
The court said young men and young women do not have the same risks

More about Michael M. V.

Open Document