Memento Film Analysis

801 Words2 Pages

I’ve had to suffer through Memento a few times in the past, and the experience was no different this time. Before I detail my thoughts on the film, I need to provide an explanation of the story. The film concerns the adventures of Leonard, a man who suffers from a condition we learned about in class called anterograde amnesia, meaning he can’t form any new memories. To counteract this, he tattoos important information on his arm and keeps photographs of the people he knows. Leonard writes captions on these photographs so as to know who is who, and what their motivation or reason for knowing him is. Leonard’s condition is what drives the film, and the film itself is told in both chronological and backwards chronological order to reflect his …show more content…

Of his photographs, of most importance are those of Teddy and Natalie, of which a caption on Teddy’s photograph warns Leonard not to trust him. This drives Leonard to trust Natalie, who takes advantage of Leonard’s memory and the fact that she can abuse Leonard’s distrust of Teddy for her own goals. Disregarding the whole Jimmy Grantz subplot and other plot details that are uninteresting and irrelevant, we finally arrive at the ending, where Teddy tells Leonard that what Leonard is looking for already happened, and to give up on his escapades. Leonard, in denial at what Teddy says, contemplates whether his amnesia really caused him to mess up, or whether Teddy is a liar. Regardless of what the truth really is, Leonard believes Teddy to be a liar, and writes him as such on the photograph of him, therefore setting off the events of the entire film again and restarting the chain of events of the film …show more content…

It’s not an awful film, but why would you ever watch it ever again? It’s a film that you forget soon after watching it. Everything is just so tame. The characters can’t even be called flat, they really just have no personality to them. If you tried to describe the characters, you’d fail, as there’s just nothing to be said about anyone. The cinematography is lackluster as well, since the framing of every shot is just so predictable. The only reason anyone really talks about the film is because of the way the story is told, which is told forwards and backwards until the story points meet. It really contributes nothing to the film, and it’s laughable when people try to analyze the film and try to find a deeper meaning where there is none. I suppose the ambiguous ending is talked about as well, but why talk about an ending when nothing else in the movie either matters or is interesting? I feel too much acclaim is given to the film because it’s Christopher Nolan, who went on to make the recent Batman films and Inception, another film that tries to push boundaries. With those films, his directorial style has clearly evolved from this film, which convinces me that people that like those films just like to highly rate Memento so as to make Christopher Nolan’s filmography look more impressive. But there just isn’t enough in the film to warrant such acclaim. Overall, I didn’t like the film upon rewatching it, and I hope I

Open Document