Mdeq Case Study Solutions

453 Words1 Page

When the city switched from Detroit water to the Flint River, they did not treat the water. They depended on the “‘wait-and-see’ approach” (Kennedy). Consequently, this increases the possibilities of corrosion in the pipes. Therefore, many people had high levels of lead found in their blood, which leads to mental disabilities especially among children. People of MDEQ disregarded the results of Virginia Tech. In addition, Edwards claims that Flint ‘does not have a corrosion control plan’” (Kennedy). This makes it difficult for the city to regain the quality of its water since they do not have an action plan. Moreover, the city “did not maintain consistent records on service line installations and materials” (Abernethy). The city failed to update its records. MDEQ should not have dismissed the people of Flint. They should have acknowledged their concerns and taken the measures for the untreated water. Ultimately, their mistakes harmed the citizens of Flint; the officials failed to put importance on Flint.
What could have been done to avoid the problem? …show more content…

Officials chose to switch to save money; however, in the long run the effects of the untreated water lead to a mass amount of expenses for the people of Flint. MDEQ should have taken in consideration the Virginia Tech results and the concerns of its people. Although the city added water additives people refused to use the water because they did not want to pay (Kennedy). The city could have avoided this issue by diminishing the water charges for a certain amount in order for the water system to

Open Document