Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drinking
Drinking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Drinking
Introduction
Regulations are created to protect the health and welfare of the public. The United States EPA develops the regulations at a federal level and each state’s EPA has the ability to make regulations pertaining to their state. The criteria for a state’s individual regulation are that it must be at least as strict as the federal regulation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the general requirements of the Lead and Copper Rule (with attention on the lead aspect) mandated to protect drinking water on the federal and state level.
Federal Regulation
The Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) was created June 7, 1991 and is found in 40 CFR 141 (USEPA, 2011). This section discuses the monitoring measures to test for the presence of lead, public notification requirements, and the action level (AL) established by the LCR. The section concludes with requirements that must be met if the AL is exceeded: water quality parameter monitoring, public education, corrosion control treatment, source water monitoring and /or treatment, and the replacement of lead service lines.
Monitoring
Monitoring is required for all community water systems (CWS) and non-transient non-community water systems (NTNCWSs). The USEPA (2011) establishes monitoring sites at homes and businesses that are at high risk of lead contamination as determined in 40 CFR 141.86(a). Water systems are required to monitor the sites every six months.
Public Notification
Two public notification clauses exist in the LCR. First is the Lead Consumer Notice, according to 40 CFR 141.86(g), lead testing results must be sent to consumers of the water supply within 30 days regardless of whether the AL was exceeded. Second is the Consumer Confidence Report, 40 CFR 141.154 sta...
... middle of paper ...
... discussed within the scope of this paper but can be found in parts 3745-81-80 to 3745-81-90 of the Administrative Code (OEPA, n.d).
Conclusion
Regulations are created to protect the health and welfare of the public. The LCR was created to protect people from lead exposure from drinking water. While the USEPA creates the original regulation, states are tasked with establishing individual plans of action to help municipalities protect public health and welfare and be in compliance with mandated regulations.
Works Cited
OEPA, (n.d.). Division of Drinking and Ground Waters Rules and Laws. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency website. Retrieved from http://www.epa.ohio.gov/ddagw/rules.aspx
USEPA, (2011). Water: Lead & Copper Rule. United States Environmental Protection Agency website. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/lcr/index.cfm
The main problem was lead, with seven well samples showing positive. The calcium and nitrates both had four samples showing positive. Hydrocarbons had 3 samples showing positive. Heavy metals have two positives,and bacteria have only 1 positive. Many men, women, and children are getting sick from horrible water pollution and some of the water pollutants cause cancer!
...fund Site. EPA Cooperative Agreement #V-006449-01-N. U Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 2006.
My first reason on how it’s is most critical for the children of the Flint water crisis, is that they make sure that the kids are not drinking the lead water, and
They are concerned that their kids are getting too much lead in the bloodstream because they have been drinking the tap water.
The Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA) was originally the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948. The original objective behind this act was to “to prepare comprehensive programs for eliminating or reducing the pollution of interstate waters and tributaries and improving the sanitary condition of surface and underground waters.” (U.S Fish and Wild Life Service, 2013). Throughout the duration of this paper the various amendments and their effects will be discussed, those involved both on the side of support and opposition and what influenced the amendments to be made and passed.
Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Protection Agency, (Nov 2011). Caa national enforcement programs. Retrieved from website: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/civil/caa/caaenfprog.html
---. “The Clean Water Act—Is it Successfully Reducing Water Pollution?- Final Draft.” UTSA: WRC 1023, 11 Apr 2014. Print.
The EPA operates from a number of laws and regulations designed to function as its foundation for protecting the environment and the health of the public. Congress allows the EPA to write regulations in order to support the ideas for implementing these regulations. For that reason they are known as a regulatory agency. These regulations fall under two categories: Laws and Executive Orders (EOs) that influence environmental protection and Laws and EOs that Influence the Regulatory Process.
comes from a public water system and tap water and bottled water have different regulations on
When I read that I was astonished and disappointed that we could be so unsafe about potentially harmful chemicals LeBlanc (2010) went on to give a reason. That reason being that the Environmental Protection Agency can only require after there is proof that a substance poses a health risk under the Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976. LeBlanc (2010) goes on and states that this is the only major environmental regulation that has not been updated and that only five chemicals have been regulated since the law enacted. This act is insane to me and I can’t believe it was ever passed. It seems pretty obvious to me that we should test chemicals for safety before we put them on the market. We should do this for a number of reasons. One of the more important being the health of pregnant women and their
The Criminal Process in Environmental Regulation. (n.d.). UH Law. Retrieved April 6, 2014, from http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/thester/courses/Environmental-Practicum-2014/syllabus/chap6.pdf
Code Ann. § 49-6-3401. (I'll link it at the end of this) What we are concerned with is section (i) :
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Developing risk communication plans for drinking water contamination incidents. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/watersecurity/lawsregs/upload/epa817f13003.pdf
As such, it has played a critical role in reducing water and air pollution as well as improving the quality of the American drinking water. It also played a critical role in safeguarding the environment against radioactive wastes, solid wastes, water pollution, and noise pollution. Nowadays, there is a myriad of statutes that are used in setting standards, monitoring, and regulating environmental pollutants (Ringquist, 2016). The EPA has established close working standards with local governments, for instance, using the Protective Action Guides that make it possible for the local authorities to come with radiation protection decisions when there are emergencies. There is also the radon program where states and local governments are funded by the EPA to monitor environmental radiation (RadNet| US EPA, 2018).