Mcdonald's Utterly De-Risking Strategy

815 Words2 Pages

According the financial data above (Hoovers,2018), McDonald's and Yum are the two companies that have adopted an utterly de-risking strategy; this has enabled them to drop their ownership of the restaurants through what is commonly known as franchising (Hoovers,2018). This strategy reduces the capital needed by the companies and boosts earnings per share growth making them less vulnerable to the food inflation. Although the two companies have similar procedures in running its operations, there are some critical aspects that differentiate the two in financially (Hoovers,2018).

Analysis and Evaluation
The revenues of McDonald's as it has been reducing over time from 27,567,000 in 2012 to 24,621,000 in 2016, this is estimated to be about -11 % decrease (Hoovers,2018) The reduction in the revenues in McDonald's is associated with the increase in food inflation, despite the reduction, it is still better as compared with that of Yum (Hoovers,2018). The reduction of revenues for McDonald's by about 11% in 2016 from that of 2012, the cost of change in the cost of goods which are sold by 17% and the given change of goods sold (COGS) as the percent revenues from 2016 at about 52% (Hoovers,2018).
The McDonald's highest net income during the period was given to be 5,585.90; this value was attained in 2013 by a change of 20% from the …show more content…

This does not show that McDonald's isn't profitable as the business could have been cost expanding the business to other new locations that they expect to grow (Hoovers,2018). The stock price of Yum steadily decreased from 64.72 to about 63.33 in the year 2016 while that of McDonald's had increased from 88.12 to an estimated value of 121.72 (Hoovers,2018). This doesn't depict the goodness or badness of investing in the

More about Mcdonald's Utterly De-Risking Strategy

Open Document