Mathew's Reputation Case Study

124 Words1 Page

He pointed out that the members of Church used a sophisticated language in order to make the speech looks like a public concern and also to protect themselves from liability. Further, he highlights that statements that damage the good reputation cannot gain protection under First Amendment. According to this case, the malicious picket was spread with declarations that supposedly conveyed issues that concerned the public opinion. He came in conclusion that protester's picket damaged Mathew's reputation and as a result Mathew's family should be recuperated. Secondly, Justice Alito also disagreed with the Court decision that the demonstrate did not have a private character and Westbor's picket on Mathew's funeral ceremony is under protection of

Open Document