Masculinity in A View From The Bridge by Arthur Miller

647 Words2 Pages

Masculinity in A View From The Bridge by Arthur Miller Miller uses several forms of masculinity to show the audience that in different circumstances and cultures different forms of masculinity are possible. This is shown to us by comparing both extremes of masculinity and what they both involve. In the longshoreman culture respect is as much a part of a man as is his own image. This leads to those members of the community going to extraordinary lengths to keep their reputation in order to stop them being emasculated in the eyes of the community. In the Sicilian culture this is not so true and a form of masculinity that has certain feminine qualities is shown to us. The Longshoreman way of life leads to a single form of masculinity emerging for the community. This is the only form of masculinity found amongst the people and is based upon a persons strength. In this community not only is physical strength an issue but also how others view you. The main problem with this form of masculinity that we are shown by Miller, is that, because the Masculinity of those in the community is based upon how others in the community view them, respect is the sole way that men can see how masculine they are "I want my respect". This alienates the men from themselves. "When am I gonna to be a wife again Eddie...I got nothing to say about it". This subsequently causes the men not to "settle for half". This is shown in the stand off between Marco and Eddie. "Wipin' the neighbourhood with my name like a dirty rag! I want my name, Marco…gimme my name". Miller uses this image of masculinity to show the audience that the normal form of masculinity is n... ... middle of paper ... ... uncomfortable with him. It can also make them feel embarrassed when this effeminate style prevails in the sexual arena over the more common form of masculinity. We can see that miller shows the audience three forms of masculinity and through the characters of the play helps to show the audience the problems with each. If we look at the play overall a rather odd thing seems to happen. Miller seems to tell us through his hidden arguments that the normal and generally accepted form of masculinity is not the best. He seems to champion the more effeminate style over the masculinity that is based upon brute force and strength. Miller suggests that there would be less tension amongst the characters if the were all less honour and image based and that they should all except each and every style of masculinity that there is.

Open Document