Marry Anning and the Fossil Hunters
Despite the fact that Mary Anning's life has been made the subject of
several books and articles, comparatively little is known about her
life, and many people are unaware of her contributions to
palaeontology in its early days as a scientific discipline. How can
someone described as 'the greatest fossilist the world ever knew' be
so obscure that even many paleontologists are not aware of her
contribution? She was a woman in a man's England.
Mary Anning was born in 1799 to Richard and Mary Anning of Lyme Regis,
situated on the southern shores of Great Britain. The cliffs at Lyme
Regis were -- and still are -- rich in spectacular fossils from the
seas of the Jurassic period. Richard and Mary had as many as ten
children, but only two of these children, Mary and Joseph, reached
maturity. Richard was a cabinetmaker and occasional fossil collector.
Unfortunately, Richard died in 1810, leaving his family in debt
without a provider. He did, however, pass on his fossil hunting skills
to his wife and children, which later proved fortuitous for the
fledgling field of palaeontology.
The Anning family lived in poverty and anonymity, selling fossils from
Lyme Regis, until the early 1820s, when the profesional fossil
collector Lt.-Col. Thomas Birch came to know the family and
sympathized with their desperate financial situation. Birch decided to
hold an auction to sell off all of his fine fossil collection and
donate the proceeds to the Anning family. He felt that the Annings
should not live in such "considerable difficulty" considering that
they have "found almost all the fine things, which have been submitted
to scientific investigation...". Up to this point mother Mary was
running the business end of fossil collecting. By the middle of the
1820s, daughter Mary had established herself as the keen eye and
accomplished anatomist of the family, and began taking charge of the
family fossil business. Joseph was, by this time, committed to a
career in the upholstery business, and no longer collected fossils.
The events that started autumn 1766 and continued for several years tested Mary's resolve more than any other time. Her sister, Rebecca, had contracted smallpox in November 1766. She passed away soon after. John Noyes, Mary's first husband, had lived with epilepsy longer than the doctors originally expected, but soon he succumbed to death as well. Having her family a distance away, Mary clutched on to John's mother as to a rock. In November 1768, the older Madam Noyes went to bed in good health but was found dead the next morning. For the first time, Mary found herself alone to take on the responsibilities of the household and family head. In May of 1770, Mary's only daughter, then 4 years old, fell ill. She died ten days later. Mary wrote, "I felt in some measure resigned, knowing that God could give a good reason why he had thus afflicted me." Despite this statement, Mary's spirit was broken and she fell into a depression, feeling that her faith had died with the child.
Jean Louis Rodolphe Agassiz was born in Motier, Switzerland on May 28, 1807. Born the son of a Protestant pastor, Louis Agassiz was raised in a religious environment but clearly possessed a deep interest in natural history and science. “I spent most of the time I could spare…in hunting the neighboring woods and meadows for birds, insects, and land and fresh water shells” (Lurie 9). Throughout his childhood and adolescence, his curiosities about nature and its origins drove him to become a prominent figure in natural history, zoology, and ichthyology.
April 3, 1934 a leader was born. A leader by the name of Jane Goodall, an extremely well rounded, primatologist of our time. Although this may seemed distant to many, it was actually her calling. At the age of one, Goodall received a stuffed chimpanzee that her father Herbert Goodall gave to her. She named the chimpanzee Jubilee, which she still keeps with her in her home in England. That was the beginning of her curious mind. She opened many eyes on the situation with chimpanzees being harmed in the jungles and discovered that they are just like “us” humans.
The Reasons for the expedition- Is To look for a new way to the Pacific to make the American claims to Oregon land. And to get more information about the Of the far west. (http://www.edgate.com/lewisandclark/)
The kind of attention that comes from discovering a fossil that may challenge pre-existing notions of human lineage is massive. When the findings were first published in “Nature” and “Science”, scientific journals, the news spread like wildfire and every news source from ABC to the BBC had the story covered. A discovery of this magnitude is highly important considering it can alter thoughts about the beginnings of the human line and cause an uproar in the science community in terms of the way human evolution is looked at. BBC News was one of the sources that covered this story when the discovery was made. Their primary article stated, “Scientists say it is the most important discovery in the search for the origins of humankind since the first Australopithecus ‘ape-man’ remains were found in Africa i...
Shubin, N.H., & Marshall, C.R. 2000. Fossils, genes and the origin of novelty. Paleobiology, 26(4): 324-340.
Smith suggests that Anne Hutchinson rally for change clashes with an intolerant leadership promoting rigid adherence to authority. In New England, Hutchinson was from an elite neighborhood. She had expertise in healing and childbirth. As such, she was an important resource among the female population and afforded her some degree of power. Hutchinson migrated to the new world. Her story is about the intolerance of women.
It has been considering the chance that various evolutionary amends happen in a clock-like way. Over the choice of millions of existence, changes can manufacture in any specified widen of DNA at a consistent pace. For instance, the genetic material that signs for the protein alpha-globin (a part of haemoglobin) event amend at a pace of.56 amends per base brace for every billion years. The genetic material can be invoked as a molecular clock, if this pace is consistent. When broaden of DNA definitely behave as a molecular clock, it estimates the dates of heredity-dividing occasions as a dominant tool. For instance, visualize that a span of DNA develops in two species changes by four base and we identify that this complete span of DNA amends at a pace of something as single base per 25 million years. That clearly means that the two DNA editions vary by 100 million years of evolutions and their familiar antecedent also lived 50 million years in the past. The two species must have a fall from a common ancestor that lived at least 50 million years in the past. Each parentage experienced its peculiar evolution (Cowen, 2013).
Jurassic Park and other films or articles like it, seem to raise an awareness to people about the possible hidden mistrust that occurs with science development. This mistrust may shock people in witnessing which direction science is heading towards and the power behind what science can do. With the motive of “profit” in Jurassic Park, I believe that it is the same motive companies use who support genetically modified organisms. An example of this was when in the film, Harvest of Fear, Greenpeace sent a letter to Gerber stating their concern that they located a genetically engineered ingredient in their products. Gerber never responded to them so they decided to announce it to the public and within a few weeks Gerber announced that they would stop using genetically engineered ingredients in their products. This change showed the consumers that big companies can easily stop production almost by overnight and not have to go through years of government regulations to get something done. What was needed to get the reaction was to give them the fear that they are going to lose a little bit of their market share. Although some companies claim to want to help the countries from starvation, it really is just a bandaid to cover the real motive. Why is it that we want to use the people from these countries as the guinea pigs for the GMO movement experiment? Do the scientists not trust their results? Do they not believe that what they are doing is to truly help?
Lincoln Rhyme, former head of Central Investigation and Resource Division, is persuaded by Lon Selitto and his partner to help the kidnapping investigation. In the mean time, the "Bone Collector" abducts another victim.
“You can do whatever you set your mind to,” said Vanne Goodall to her young daughter Jane. There words would inspire Jane Goodall to become one of the most well known wildlife researcher in the world. Starting at a young age Jane showed an interest in animals. She spent her days reading books on animals or exploring nature outside. In May of 1956 Jane was invited to visit their family farm. Jane spent the next year working hard as a waitress to earn enough money to pay for the trip. After arriving there in April 1957 Jane meet the famous anthropologist Louis Leakey who hired her as his secretary and then he helped set her up in Tanzania to start studying chimpanzees. A lot of people doubted Leakey’s decision to choose Jane Goodall to do a study of chimpanzees for him but he supported Goodall who at that time did not even have a college degree.
Bowens, Amanda. Underwater Archaeology: The NAS Guide to Principles and Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2009. Print.
Symbolism is used to convey the message that Brazil mistakes a burden for a reward, as he is encumbered with the mission to find his family’s history by himself when Lucy dies, emphasizing that African-Americans had to work and labor to uncover their own heritage and history. 'The hole’ (Parks,185) symbolizes history in general, and throughout Brazil and Lucy's conversation, Brazil is digging through the hole with the intent to uncover parts of African-American history that were purposely hidden from their family. The Foundling Father started this process many years ago, and when he passes, Lucy and Brazil are left to dig through American history to find their past. The two exclamation marks at the end of the quote indicate Brazil is excited
The finding that will be discussed is the discovery of a new type of long- necked Sauropod Dinosaur named Rapetosauras, in the country of Madagascar (National Science Foundation). It was found by two groups of scientists. One group was headed up by Dr. Catherine Forster of SUNY Stony Brook and the other was led by Dr. Curry Rogers of the Science Museum of Minnesota (National Science Foundation). The paleontologists in total found a skeleton that possessed a set of 80 to 90 vertebrate from the neck all the way down to the tail (National Geographic). The two teams also discovered two nearly complete skulls, one from a young Rapetosauras and another from an adult (National Geographic). The Rapetosauras is a type of Dinosaur called a Titano...
...aware that fossil records contradicted him as they represented the fact that new species had appeared with no evidence of an evolutionary ancestry. Darwin argued that fossil record was not accurate and should not be used as an indication on whether species are introduced suddenly. He also claimed that rocks containing fossils are only created through special situations and after the long period of time from when it was created. Another issue that is related to fossils was born after the sudden discovery of a whole group of living things at a certain point in the fossil records. The best example of this occurring was with the discovery of all the basic modern types that originated from the Cambrian era. Darwin tries to argue that the imperfections of the records include these fossils. Although he had plenty of hypotheses for this, he had no evidence to back it up.