Mark Bauerlein: The Dumbest Generation

961 Words2 Pages

Mark Bauerlein’s assumption that all people who are younger than 30 suffer from idiocy rests solely upon the assumption of the connotative definition of being dumb; his is that someone who is dumb is someone who does not know factual information. Despite what Bauerlein says about how people these days are members of the “dumbest generation”, children and young adults are in fact members of the smartest generation to be seen in recent decades. According to Sharon Begley, a science columnist from Newsweek, she states in her article that “If dumb means lacking such fundamental cognitive capacities as the ability to think critically and logically, to analyze an argument, to learn and remember, to see analogies, to distinguish fact from opinion… …show more content…

We have also begun something that Clive Thompson and Andrea Lunsford both agree upon; that the “dumbest generation” is in the “midst of a literacy revolution.” Teenagers will communicate with one another, that’s obvious. They talk, Skype, and most commonly, text. Most of the time teenagers will be texting nonstop: to their parents, friends, or whomever they desire. But texting is bad, isn’t it? According to Andrea Lunsford, texting is the root cause of this revolution. For children and young adults, all communication is done through writing. Whether it be emails, text messages, chat rooms, or more formal projects such as essays, assignments, or journals, all is mostly completed by writing. With all of these uses of writing, the “dumbest generation” writes exceedingly more than their parents generation, whom would only write in school or in jobs that required it. According to Lunsford, the technical level of writing has improved as well, “The students were remarkably adept at what rhetoricians call kairos - assessing their audience and adapting their tone and technique to best get their point across” (Lunsford qtd Thompson). The children of the “dumbest generation” so far have been able to do the impossible. We have redefined the social barriers that prevented us from being a socially equal and innovative society, we have allowed the classroom setting to be more self taught …show more content…

Based off a survey done by “What Americans Know: 1989-2007” in Bauerliens article, “56 percent of 18- to 29-year olds possessed low knowledge levels, while only 22 percent of 50- to 64-year olds did.” In layman's terms, this survey means that the majority of the young adults in the world know little “intellectual information.” Bauerlein is not the first person to speak out about the younger generation struggling with information. R. Smith Simpson, an author from an article in the 1962 issue of the government’s Foreign Service Journal. Simpson states, “An abysmal ignorance of so elementary a subject as the geography of the United States… elementary economics and social data… so with historical, sociological, and cultural.” Even from 1962 and earlier, people have been criticizing the younger generations for their lack of knowledge of factual information, thinking because we do not know “elementary facts”, we cannot be smart. The issue with that thinking is, what is more important, knowing or finding information? In my opinion, finding it is more important. Technology is an indispensable occurrence in our lives. Because of this, it makes getting to an internet source very easy, therefore making the process of getting

Open Document