Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American literature after world war II
Impact of World War 1 and 2 on literature
Impact of World War 1 and 2 on literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American literature after world war II
The Book Thief In Marcus Zusack’s THE BOOK THIEF Liesel learns how powerful words are and how they can be used for good and evil. Throughout the story Liesel gains a hunger for books like never before. Liesel is constantly being surprised on the way the power of words affect not only her, but the of everyone around her. One way that Liesel learns how powerful words are is through Hitler in her dreams.”The book thief was dreaming about the Fuhrer(...) she was attending a rally at which he spoke, she was listening contentedly to the torrent of words spilling from his mouth. Jis sentences glowed in the light.” This sentence from the text proves that Hitler captivated all of the Germans through words. His words were the only thing he had to become …show more content…
It happened suddenly there were no alarms or warnings. Everyone Liesel cared about died except herself, because she was reading in the basement. Words literally saved her life. These three examples of how words were used for good and evil really show you the impact you can have on someone's life by what you say or what you write. Max and Liesel both used their words for good and in the end words saved both of their lives. While Hitler used his words for evil and manipulation and with those words he ended up taking many people's lives, and eventually his own. Words are more powerful than any of us could ever imagine that is why we have to be careful on how we use them. You have to decide if you are going to use your words like Liesel or if you are going to use them like Hitler. I hope you choose Liesel because the way she used words was more impactful than anyone could ever imagine. Bibliography 1. Zusak, Markus, and Trudy White. The Book Thief. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2016.
The Book Thief and The Devil’s Arithmetic both focus on the prejudice Hitler had on different types of people during World War II. Liesel and Hannah both lost someone they had dearly loved. Liesel lost Rudy and Hannah lost many members of her family. In a time of fearfulness, both had told stories to the people surrounding them. Although both were not seen as equal in the eyes of many during their time, I see them as courageous and brave heroes after what they underwent.
In this passage, Liesel just stopped beating up Ludwig Schmeikl and Tommy Muller. Liesel is mad because she is learning how to read with Hans but can’t prove it to her classmates that she can read so they think she is stupid. Liesel tries to defend herself not by proving that she’s not stupid but with violence instead, much like how Hitler handled the Jews with killing them and destroying their homes.
She loves how words can fill her up, but then she also realizes that words can be ugly things, especially in the way Hitler can use words to encourage the German people to carry out horrific violence and cause so much suffering. She
Elie and Liesel live and survive during the time of World War II. Both characters face the harsh reality of the terrible period of time they are living in. The memoir, Night and the movie, “The Book Thief” share similarities and dissimilarities that make Elie and Liesel both stand out. Due to the loss of family, determination to live, and fear helps both of them survive the war, but depends on the different reactions, mistreated for different reasons, and hope.
How are the themes of good and evil explored in Chapters 16 and 17 of
“Like most misery, it started with apparent happiness” (84). In the beginning, we are introduced to the narrator by the name of Death. He informs the readers that he has many stories, but only remembers the ones that interest him. The tale of Liesel Meminger is one such tale, as he was always fascinated by her will to live through the most horrible instances. It should be duly noted however, that this story does not have a happy ending. Death makes this clear before we even have a chance to get our hopes up. He tells us that everyone dies; the amount of time that they last is truly the only difference. After this sordid fact is in place, he mentions just Liesel first attracted his attention.
Once actually forced to fight, Hitler still dominated and he could have very possibly won the war if not for that one fatal mistake he made by hesitating in his plans against the English. I think it is important that Lukacs makes sure to get this message across because some people choose to ignore this truth due to the devastating outcomes that would have resulted if Hitler succeeded. The major point presented by Lukacs concerning the difference between Hitler and Churchill has to do with nationalim versus patriotism. Lukacs describes Hitler as a nationalist and Churchill as a patriot. He describes Hitler as a man of ideas and Churchill as a of man principles, because Churchill's ideas changed throughout the war while Hitler tended to think that his ideas were principles.
Evil. It is a word that has been used for hundreds of years, yet the
Through segregation, loss of identity, and abuse, Wiesel and the prisoners around him devolve from civilized human beings into savage animals. The yellow stars begin separation from society, followed by ghettos and transports. Nakedness and haircuts, then new names, remove each prisoner’s identity, and physical abuse in the form of malnourishment, night marches, and physical beatings wear down prisoners. By the end of Night, the prisoners are ferocious from the experiences under German rule and, as Avni puts it, “a living dead, unfit for life” (Avni 129). The prisoners not only revert to animal instincts, but experience such mental trauma that normal life with other people may be years away. Night dramatically illustrates the severe dehumanization that occurred under Hitler’s rule.
Chance and choice are completely different paths that can be taken to make decisions. The former is based on loss of control and refractory fate. The latter, however, allows there to be a perfect balance between hope, fate, and effective action-taking. While chance and choice are opposites, chance can open opportunities to make choices, and choices can create chances that allow things to happen that would not otherwise occur. “Night”, “The Book Thief” and “The Diary of Anne Frank” are all examples of novels where characters during the Holocaust took life changing decisions, defined by their chances and
By “looking gravely at Liesel’s cheek”, he is extremely serious about the situation. However, he goes on to tell her that she “can say that in our house.” This essentially means Hans tolerates Liesel saying that, so long as Liesel never says it “on the street, at school, or at the BDM.” He does not want Liesel to get herself into trouble, so he decided to slap her to ultimately protect her, which is a thought-provoking moment. The two contrasts work together seamlessly to provide the idea that the destruction of Hans slapping Liesel is negated by the beauty in his willingness to protect her. Beauty intertwined with destruction is also present when the Himmel Street residents are in the bomb shelter, and Liesel begins to read to them. Death says, “The youngest kids were soothed by her voice, and everyone saw visions of the whistler running from the crime scene” (381). This quote shows the beauty of Liesel’s words alongside the ongoing air raid sirens. She was able to make the children
The most differentiating factor between humans and other creatures on earth is humanity's insatiable desires and emotions that defy all evolutionary logic. Michael Crichton’s The Great Train Robbery tells a story of a man driven by these desires and emotions to put his life at risk with one of the most daring crimes of his time. The man, known as Edward Pierce, has little insight to his mysterious character as he is often lacking of emotion and never straightforward with anyone else in the novel. However, there is enough evidence to deduce his primary motives behind the robbery. The Great Train Robbery, conveys its Pierce as an unfeeling sociopath, who is driven not by greed or a desire for fame, but by his extreme sense of self-pride.
The power words are limitless. It does not matter in what language one speaks; persuasion is the key to manipulated people for good or bad. “Whatever words we utter should be chosen with care for people will hear them and be influenced by them for good or ill.” Words are a weapon, and when one uses words carefully to persuade people, it can lead to chaos. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare portrays a universal theme in which friends and enemies turn to against each other, and a war stimulates out of lies and ambition for power. The usage of old and wise words to manipulated people lead to great revelry.
Liesel has many difficulties through the novel that only add to her mountain that she needs to climb. She has great obstacles and yet she seems to conquer all of them with the help of her friends and her family.
This is what had made Hitler one of the greatest public speakers that the world had ever seen from his time and in history. "The German people and it 's soldiers work and fight today not for themselves and their own age, but also for many generations to come. A historical task of unique dimensions has been entrusted to us by the Creator that we are now obliged to carry out." Hitler, the Fuhrer of Germany, was a very talented spokesman in ways that leaders today could not even begin to compare with. He was charismatic and bold, making it easier for him to win over the minds of many Germans with these two traits. He believed that during his rise to power, he and the people of Germany had been given a duty by God to purify the nation of its imperfect races and weaker people so as to make the mother country strong again for future generations. "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." In many ways, Hitler felt he was justified in what he was doing, and in some