Mandatory Attendance Law Essay

468 Words1 Page

Roger Sipher introduced his case of the American educational system is falling apart; there has been a decrease in students meeting the required pass mark of graded work.
Roger puts forts that the mandatory attendance law is believed to be a contributing factor. It forces children to attend school when they have no interest in being there. They show no care for learning thus influence and prevent the children who are eager to learn to stray and end up not getting the knowledge.
He argued that to put an end to the mandatory attendance law would result in only children who want to attend school to do so. He went further to say that data shows small amount of facts that the mandatory law has up the number of kids in school, but also showed that the institutions don’t normally follow through as a result of the cost affixed (Economist, William Landes and Lewis Solomon).
All guardians require quality learning for their dependents, however the requirements of the attendance law conflicts with the outcome of the learning. The rules of the attendance law affect the capabilities of the teachers to put in the necessary disciplinary actions in place to ensure students are up to the public …show more content…

By doing so everyone would understand that the school environment is a place for learning and not for idling. Teachers would have more time to focus on facilitating learning instead of wasting their time calling to the ones who don’t want to learn for they would no longer attend school. Grades would improve so report cards would reflect such. Persons would think of school as a way of improving oneself instead of a place for idlers. Children would be more serious from an early age knowing that if they don’t perform up to the standard of the school they could no longer attend. The money saved from the mandatory attendance law could be used towards other areas of

Open Document