Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Medical malpractice and how patients and physicians are affected
Essay on the effects of malpractice
Klebanow 2013 The Practice of Malpractice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It is safe to say that in the past 20 years or so, the number of cases in malpractice litigation has increased dramatically. This has had extremely adverse effects on the way doctors choose to treat their patients, the way patients view their doctors, and how society in general views the medical profession. Litigation, it seems, has become the most common response to a bad outcome. This is especially troubling since claims of malpractice generally occur when bad outcomes are combined with "bad feelings." Doctors are therefore pressured into making some sort of defensive decisions in order to protect themselves from lawsuits. Furthermore, this use of defensive medicine may even alter a doctor’s own personal practice or the practice of their institution. Unfortunately, all doctors – regardless of the type of medicine they practice, are prone to being sued throughout their medical career. However, it does appear that those practicing “higher liability” medical professions are the most likely recipients of lawsuits. In this paper, I will explore the use of defensive medicine according to physician specialty and attempt to find their relationship to medical malpractice.
Defining the term “defensive medicine” is crucial to the understanding of my project. In its most basic form, defensive medicine is “[the] practice of medicine centering, as its primary aim, around self-protection from liability in the event of a tragic outcome, rather than affording primacy to the patient's well-being…” (Hauser et al. 1991). Defensive medicine or defensive decision-making generally requires doctors to perform unnecessary tests and treatments for their patients. Many may also avoid taking care of “higher risk” patients, which includes “patients with c...
... middle of paper ...
...limited geographic coverage, reliance on self-reports with limited sample size the extremely low response rates, limited information on physician specialty, and a lack of information on the size of payments” (Kane 2008) Though the National Practitioner Data Bank does a good job in recording most cases in which a plaintiff was awarded monetary compensation on behalf of a physician, it still does not report the specialties of the physicians and does not keep any information on cases that do not result in a payment.
I have a personal interest in this topic. Currently, I have aspirations to go to law school and study medical law. I would like to specialize in malpractice defense, working at a hospital and protecting its doctors from incoming lawsuits. As an English major, I can use my skills in writing, research, and communication to help my clients.
In the healthcare industry, medical malpractice has a history that extends way beyond the days of physicians carrying a black bag full of medication and remedies to treat patients. Health care has since evolved to digital technology that can detect and treat disease. However, before physicians had advanced machinery making medical diagnosis, doctors had their textbooks and medical judgment to rely on for treatment. Physicians are human and medical mistakes can happen, but should not happen due to negligence. With that said, medical malpractice lawsuits are not the latest trend in the United States. According to the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health, medical malpractice lawsuits first appeared in the United States beginning in the 1800s. However, before the 1960s, legal claims for medical malpractice were rare, and had little impact on the practice of medicine. Since the 1960s the frequency of medical malpractice claims has increased; and today, lawsuits filed by aggrieved patients alleging malpractice by a physician are relatively common in the United States.
Learning from what Dr. Anna Pou had to face with the lawsuits she was dealing with makes me cringe. As Healthcare professionals, having to worry of possibly being sued for believing what is right for the patient or as a whole for the hospitals health is ridiculous. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Often time’s society look at courts cases as a battle versus two oppositions, but Dr. Pou’s case it is not. In her statements from national television she states saying her role was to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’.
One of the most complex, ever-changing careers is the medical field. Physicians are not only faced with medical challenges, but also with ethical ones. In “Respect for Patients, Physicians, and the Truth”, by Susan Cullen and Margaret Klein, they discuss to great extent the complicated dilemmas physicians encounter during their practice. In their publication, Cullen and Klein discuss the pros and cons of disclosing the medical diagnosis (identifying the nature or cause of the disease), and the prognosis (the end result after treating the condition). But this subject is not easily regulated nor are there guidelines to follow. One example that clearly illustrates the ambiguity of the subject is when a patient is diagnosed with a serious, life-threatening
Explain the issue or dilemma using information from the readings in the book and other sources.
Medical error occurs more than most people realize and when a doctor is found negligent the patient has the right to sue for compensation of their losses. Debates and issues arise when malpractice lawsuits are claimed. If a patient is filing for a medical malpractice case, the l...
In conclusion, every patient is worried about their rights to care but not so much are focused on the rights of the physicians providing the care. It is hard to establish a respectable practice if you are required to perform care for instances in which you object or do not want to be a part of. This detracts from the ethical background of practice and procedure every physician should hold to the highest standard.
The act of medical responsibility originated in Rome and England dating back to the time of 2030 BC. The act states that a learned professional should always care with responsibility and care toward their profession. Around the year of 1200 AD, Roman law considered medical malpractice to be wrong and expanded their views about it all throughout Europe. It was said by the Code of Hammibal that if a person commits malpractice knowingly or unknowingly they would lose their job, hand, and an eye. Malpractice had also occurred throughout the U.S around the 19th century, due to the negligence of the state’s governments. Medical malpractice litigation has since been sustained for a century and a half by an interacting combination of 6 principal factors.” “Three of these factors are medical: the innovative pressures on American medicine, the spread of uniform standards, and the advent of medical malpractice liability insurance.” “Three are legal factors: contingent fees, citizen juries, and the nature of tort pleading in the United State.” (Mohr). The U.S is very familiar with malpractice b...
The term "medical negligence" is often used synonymously with "medical malpractice," and for most purposes that's adequate. Strictly speaking though, medical negligence is only one required legal element of a meritorious (legally valid) medical malpractice claim.
Given the difficulties in the present tort system, we often become victims of the failures of medicine as opposed to beneficiaries of its many successes. Physicians have lost in that they have changed, limited, or closed their practices after having spent the most vigorous years of their lives training for such work. Patients have lost in that the physicians of their choice, with whom they have developed trusting relationships, are no longer available to care for them. It is certain that the system requires sensible reform (p.525).
When evaluating medical malpractice, this can be performed by any healthcare professional. It is easy to classify this to be misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, delayed treatment, even not taking the time to evaluate a patient properly. When practicing medicine it is important that all measures be taken when a patient is showing signs of infection or having any adverse reaction to medication. In the case study below this is a prime example of the importance of checking patient progression.
Over the span of half a century, the medical profession has witnessed a catastrophic shift in the patient-physician relationship. As the manufacturing of new pharmaceuticals and the number of patients under a physician’s care continue to rise, doctor’s are finding it difficult to employ the time-honored principles listed within the Hippocratic Oath. This oath, written in 430 BC by the Greek Physician, Hippocrates, was the first document to state the responsibilities of a physician to his patient (vadscorner, pg 2). Hippocrates believed that it was the physician’s duty, as a healer, to treat the patient infected with the disease to the best of his ability, and not to treat the disease (Hippocrates, pg 1 ). He believed that the patient was, above all, the most important aspect involved in the healing process. With the rise in the number of patients under a physician’s care and the stringent rules by which each doctor must abide, many doctor’s are finding that they are unable to devote ample time to become acquainted with their patients (spiralnotebook, pg 1). Furthermore, as newly acquired information regarding illnesses becomes available on the internet, patients are seeking the advice of multiple physicians (Changing, pg 3). These differences between patients and their physicians, as well as numerous others, have caused rifts in the patient-doctor relationship.
My plan for after high school is to major in a science related to the medical field, most likely something that relates neuroscience with genetic studies, like neurobiology. I also hope to take the pre-medical classes required for me to enroll in medical school, which is my current goal for after undergraduate college.
I want to be a nurse, specifically a nurse practitioner. I have always been fascinated with the medical field and see a bright future in it for me. I have the opportunity of meeting new people every day with a variety of personalities. There is always something new to discover in this field. A nurse practitioner's job is to be able to diagnose and treat illnesses. They also prescribe medicine and run physical exams. I am highly interested in pursuing the career of a nurse practitioner because the healthcare field is always in need for medical professionals, it pays well, and I am helping people at the same time.
While attending college, it is my ultimate goal to become a doctor, either a podiatrist, radiologist, or plastic surgeon. I intend to earn my undergraduate degree at the University of Florida, majoring in chemistry. Then, I plan to attend medical school at the University of Florida, as well. After completing a residency in my specialty, I would like to begin a medical practice somewhere in central Florida.
Many individuals are in denial about their health as a result they do not take responsibility for their health. These individuals rather have a doctor tell them that their condition is hereditary opposed to blatantly honest responses such as “Stop smoking.” or “Change your eating habits.” which imply that the individual is at fault. An article on the blog ‘Medical Malprocess’, outlines the responsibility of doctor and patient by stating that: “The providers should be held responsible for their advice and actions only. We patients should be responsible for the consequences of our decisions and actions.” This shows that while doctors may be responsible in a patient’s health that patient is also considered responsible for their actions or decisions that may have caused or worsened their condition. The blog farthest outlines and illustrates these responsibilities by giving examples such as; a regularly smoker should be responsible for getting lung cancer as this increasing their chances. However a non-smoker’s actions should not be accused if they got lung cancer.