Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Toyota motor manufacturing usa case study
Strengths and weaknesses of the Toyota production line
Strength and weakness of the Toyota production system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Toyota motor manufacturing usa case study
LEAN Logistics
History and Principles of LEAN
In the mid 1950s Taiichi Ohno started developing the methodology and principles of the Lean Manufacturing Approach in the form of the Toyota Production System (TPS) and to implement it at Toyota in the automobile assembly line production, which at that time was extremely unprogressive and of inferior quality.
The essential principle of the LEAN Manufacturing Approach is the implementation of the workflow in which all work sequences throughout all corporate functions are standardized and continuously optimized – holistically integrated without department, division or country boundaries.
The Four Basic Rules of LEAN
1. All work must be standardized to a high degree in terms of content, workflow and timing.
2. All customer and vendor relationships (external and internal) have to be direct, and there must be a clear yes/no procedure.
3. The pathway for every product and service has to be simple and direct.
4. All improvements have to be carried out in accordance with the standardized methodology and under the supervision of the “teacher” (Sensei) on the lowest possible organizational level.
Lean first goal is to reduce the total logistics costs by increasing the speed as well as the flow of material and information. Waste and variation needs to be taken out from the SupplyChain.
Then the second goal is visualize where the waste is and allocate resources where the biggest opportunities for improvements are, so we can get the most out of them.
The third and also very important objective is to improve the customer delivery performance while also reducing the total logistics costs. For achieving this goal it is very important to apply lean tools and systemic improvement m...
... middle of paper ...
...d processes are more inefficient. The main issue is that efficiency is no normally measure or not measure correctly. Further, other logistic processes are not analyzed and controlled like reverse logistics for returnable packaging, etc. Purchasing is focus toward getting the cheapest company by unit base and does not take into consideration the efficiency of the operation. Logistics companies run at low efficiency (cube and weight).Normally, systems are much disintegrated
.
Excels are used for execution and kanban sizing and standard processes are not implemented to maintain these pull systems. MRP is still driving the supply part and forecast information for suppliers have a lot of variation due to wrong information and bull whip effects (“Garbage in garbage out2). The weakest links need to be identified and improve in order to strength the whole supply chain.
In today’s marketplace and world of business it is critical that customers receive a quality product in a timely manner from the supplier. It is also critical as a supplier and business that waste is reduce in all categories including inventory, time, facility space, storage, and also transportation. Several methods have been created and adopted over the past 20 years from top companies with successful track records such as Toyota, GE, and Motorola. One method or process that has proving to be successful is none other than Lean Six Sigma. Lean Six Sigma evolved as a concept in the early years of the 2000s which combines the Lean manufacturing method and also the concept of Six Sigma. When you blend both processes together, you have in return a better delivery schedule, better quality, outstanding employees, satisfied customers and last but not least profit. Profitability as we all know is the goal for any business, organization, or manufacturing company as well as to increase throughput while reducing inventory and operational expense (Eliyahu M. Goldratt).
One noticeable thing about the lean approach to work force management was the respect and trust invested in the work force as well as the system. The workers were earlier seen as negative necessities of the system rather than contributing members and understandably the workers felt that since they were going to be with the firm for a long time period, things should be done their way.
Lean manufacturing refers to systematic identification and elimination of waste through CI processes in pursuit of perfection (Khan et al. 2013; Yang & Yang 2013). Lean production is now used worldwide in manufacturing plants to eliminate waste from all ar...
Intense global competition, rapid technological changes, advances in manufacturing and information technology and discerning customers are forcing manufacturers to optimize manufacturing process, operations, and all the possible nodes of supply chains that enable them to deliver high-quality products in a short period of time (Karim et al. 2013). The origins of lean thinking can be found on the shop-floors of Japanese manufacturers and, in particular, innovations at Toyota Motor Corporation (Shingo, 1981, 1989; Monden, 1994; Ohno, 1988). These innovations, resulting from a scarcity of resources and intense domestic competition in the Japanese market for automobiles, included the just-in-time (JIT) production system, the Kanban method of pull production, respect for employees and high levels of employee problem-solving/automated mistake proofing. This lean operations management design approach focused on the elimination of waste and excess from the tactical product flows at Toyota (the Toyota "seven wastes") and represented an alternative model to that of capital-intense mass production with its large batch
Moore, R., & Scheinkopf, L. (1998, January 1). Theory of Constraints and Lean Manufacturing: Friends or Foes?. . Retrieved June 14, 2014, from http://www.tocca.com.au/uploaded/documents/lean%20and%20toc.pdf
Achieving quality of conformance involved conform to specifications that involve providing customers with a quality product at the right price which accounts for the cost of materials. In order for a company to achieve and produce a successful product that customers want and need, it is vital that quality management and lean systems play front row. Quality management helps organizations to reduce waste and inventory. “Lean is about challenging the way things are done and opening our eyes to that waste and inefficiency” (Lean Benefits - Benefits of Lean, Why Lean is Important, 2015). Within each of these concepts are important tool and techniques that organizations can use to achieve a quality product. In this paper I will discuss “cost of quality” from the quality management side and “kaizen’s” from the lean system side, while discussing how each of these concepts are implemented into my own life or
The Lean method mainly focuses on eliminating wastes in the organization. Wastes such as any activity that does not add to the final product (i.e. patient care). Also, keeping tabs on inventory of supplies to keep the par consistently filled. Along with using technology to improve day to day functions. And finally, another aspect that is crucial in the working environments
Abstract—Lean is to eliminate or reduce waste or non – value adding activities and Six Sigma is to continuous quality improvement within the construction processes. This paper describes the combination of Lean methodology and Six Sigma approach as a quality initiative and waste elimination that may be applied to various construction industries. A quantitative study based approach will be adopted in order to identify and understand the attributes affecting the quality and causing waste within the construction processes. The data collected will be quantified using SPSS (Statistical Package for social science). Thereby providing necessary improvements and control measures. In this paper application of DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and
With the objective of manufacturing the vehicles in the most effective way and supplying the vehicles to the customers on time. The Toyota Production System (TPS) governs on two theories, namely "Jidoka" implying humanized automation that discovers process glitches and product shortcomings so that the equipment stops straight away averting further flawed production. The second concept of "Just-in-Time"(JIT) shows in a continuous flow, each procedure will only yield the fixed quantity as required by the succeeding process. During the commencement of Toyota, the market demand was at the peak. They touched a limit where they couldn 't meet these escalating demands. In a conventional way, they positioned all the machines together. However, after the implementation of production simulator with all the support from the people and management, they altered the layout of the entire plant as per their process flow. This made their work easier in terms of carrying parts back and forth in between the processes. With the vision of multi-tasking, each worker was executing on more than one machine. These lead to the
We will focus not merely on identifying and mitigating risk in all of our activities, but on assure quality through communication, training, and development, everyone will have the competence to perform their tasks efficiently.
In the new global economy, with the improved information technology, and the increased competition, a study by Levy (2007) shows that, many companies have attempted to recognize and implement lean production (LP) systems, established by Toyota, that involve goals such as just-in-time (JIT) delivery, low inventories, zero defects, flexible production in small batches and close practical cooperation with suppliers. Therefore, this paper will present how Kellogg’s has been able to manage its lean production in a very efficient way to create long term value products and competitive advantage.
Toyota is a pioneer of the LEAN manufacturing principle. Lean, as a process, is a way to add value to customers while minimizing waste (LEI, 2011). It can also be thought of in terms of flow, which is how Toyota likes to think of it. It is simply a process of decision making where the problems tend to be thought of in terms of flow, reducing starts and stops or unnecessary motion increases flow, reducing waste.
These core competencies are a part of their production system, better known as the Toyota Production System (TPS). The TPS is based on the philosophy of “completely eliminating all waste”. Excess inventory, defective products, and unnecessary processing steps are all inclusive when discussing excessive waste, which eventually negatively effects the corporation as a whole. In 1924, Sakichi Toyoda created the Toyoda Automatic Loom, which improved productivity and work efficiency by eliminating wasteful practices and defective products. Kiichiro Toyoda believed that “the ideal conditions for creating things are more successful when machines, facilities, and people work together to add value without generating any waste.”
...hould be noted that the process of Lean management was first applied in the area of manufacturing. Some analysts tell that his particular business management process came out of the Toyota Company’s production system of cars. It should be noted that the Japanese are very much inclined to adopt anything that would reduce costs and eliminate wastes. Hence, it is no wonder that the Japanese are known for their simplicity and design and the minimalist view on things. However, nowadays has evolved from the area of manufacturing and could now be applied in the area of management. Before moving forward to the essential principles of Lean management, it would be better to clearly define it first. The said book by Bradley did not really give a definite and concise definition of Lean. Instead, he tried to define this said business management concept though examples.
Supply Chain Digest, 2010. Supply Chain News: Is “Lean” to Blame for Toyota’s Recall Issues?