Live For Now Ad Analysis

1208 Words3 Pages

On January 24th, 1987, Pepsi managed to catch the King of Pop’s hair on fire, leaving him with burn wounds and scars for the rest of his life. On April 4th, 2017, Pepsi lit fire to its own proverbial hair with the release of its “Live for Now” ad, leaving the company scarred and burned for months to come. The problems with the ad stem from its abrasive use of their key three colors, the use of Kendall Jenner as the leader of a racially charged protest, and the trivialization of protests themselves.
Based on this ad alone, Pepsi seems to only know three colors: red, white, and, of course, blue. When the ad first shows the protest from a distant, one of the first things to catch your eye is the copious amount of signs. All of these signs either …show more content…

She is seen wearing a dark, wine red lipstick, blonde wig, metallic silver dress, and a black throw-over jacket. For some reason, the protest catches her eye and she becomes instantly enthralled with the proceedings to the point of leaving the shoot to join the protest. She somehow makes a wardrobe change in the street from this glitz and glamour look to jeans, a white t-shirt, a blue jacket, and is now wig-less and without makeup. This weird wardrobe change gives off the air that Jenner must lower herself from her elite status to join a protest that she knows nothing about and is just joining for the hell of it. In fact, using Jenner as the lead in the ad doomed it from the beginning. Jenner and the rest of the Kardashian clan have been focal points of cultural appropriation scandals in the past, which never looks good for an ad whose focal protest is similar to that of a BLM movement. Looking at their various Instagram posts and Snapchat stories, one can find images of the Kardashian-Jenner sisters wearing “Boxer Braids”, “KKW Signature Braids”, and various other hairstyles synonymous with African-American culture. This isn’t to say anything is wrong with wearing these styles, but the fact that people say this is a new trend that the Kardashian-Jenner’s are starting is when the culture becomes appropriated. The sisters also have not been known to speak up or out on …show more content…

While there is nothing wrong with this message, the way that Pepsi went about it resulted in the immense amount of backlash the ad received. Protests are becoming more and more common in this crazy, fucked up world we live in, where our country is run by a tangerine with a hairpiece, and police can openly kill people of color with little to no consequence. Many of these protests, not surprisingly, preach a message of racial equality. This is mainly through the organization known as Black Lives Matter (or BLM). The protest in the Pepsi commercial echoes these BLM protests and lazily shoe-horns in people of color to show that they are, in fact, a diversity-focused company. The ad shows a sole Eastern-Asian man, a singular Muslim woman, a smattering of African American men and women, a still of two trans-women, and a surprising amount of white people. This comes off as pandering to these demographics and makes these actors “token” races in the commercial. On top of haphazard diversity, Pepsi trivializes the institution of peaceful protest. No protest is full of laughing and smiling people with coolers of Pepsi for everyone participating in spontaneous displays of dance set to random street music. No protest is greeted calmly by an extremely spaced out police line. No protest erupts into a chorus of cheers as one of the participants, in this case, Kendall Jenner, approaches aforementioned police line and proceeds to give them a

More about Live For Now Ad Analysis

Open Document