Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American foreign policy vietnam war
Analyze the United States policy of Containment in Vietnam
American foreign policy vietnam war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American foreign policy vietnam war
Colonel Gian Gentile is a retired U.S. Army seasoned combat battalion commander. He served in the Iraq War. Has taught history for the United States Military Academy at West Point. Presently, acts as senior historian for the Rand Corporation in his book Wrong Turn: America’s Deadly Embrace of Counterinsurgency questioned, “The necessity and efficacy of the doctrine of counterinsurgency (COIN) which is essentially armed nation-building.”
Gentile a trained historian with an eye for detail draws upon our Nation’s foreign interventions in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan in hopes of gaining additional insight into where we have been and where we are going with the strategy of waging counterinsurgency. In addition, Gentile pulls from narratives from the Malaya Emergency that took place from 1948-1960 as the British Empire was beginning to wane and needed to withdraw from the colonial possessions.
The British defeated the Malayan Communist insurgents after twelve years of fighting, but Gentile debates how the victory was won. In fact, he has reservations of whether British doctrine “Hearts and Minds” then modern counterinsurgency strategy had any bearing on the success of the British campaign. Gentile postulates the tactic of search and destroy framework along with the shift in the insurgent’s strategy is what altered the armed rebellion. Gentile argues the large-unit sweeps had major significance in fragmenting the insurgents into smaller bands therefore, disrupting the insurgents secure bases like those of Mao amassed in China. In interesting field research conducted by Sociologist Lucien Pye of the Communist insurgents from 1952 to 1953 she concurred with this analysis that large sweeps of search and destroy did disrupt the ins...
... middle of paper ...
...ve anything to do with the American Surge lead by General Petraeus.
This brings us to the discussion of Gentiles views on Afghanistan. Gentile has misgivings the effectiveness of counterinsurgency and taunts, “That American counterinsurgency has not worked and is nation building at the barrel of a gun.” Furthermore, “American strategy has failed in Afghanistan because it has become trapped by the promise that counterinsurgency can work if only it is given enough time and tactical tweaking” Gentile states besides, “There was a better strategy in Afghanistan available to American political and military leaders from the start.” This brings us to the works that Gentile refers to by Austin Long’s, “Small Is Beautiful: The Counterterrorism Option in Afghanistan,” the core policy of destroying al Qaeda could have been handled by much smaller special operation teams.”
Appy’s book is valuable to its readers in showing how Vietnam became the template for every American war since, from novelties like the invasion of Grenada to the seemingly never-ending conflicts post-9/11. But before all that, there was Vietnam, and, larger lessons aside, Appy’s book is a fascinating, insightful, infuriating and thought-provoking study of that conflict, from its earliest days
In Stephen Kinzer’s Overthrow, centuries of American Intervention in foreign affairs is detailed and discussed. Three sections of the novel: The Imperial Era, Covert Actions, and Invasions speak of recurring patterns and themes throughout history in regards to American involvement. Kinzer suggests such actions were fueled by economic self-interest, ideologies, and the inherent belief that America is a force for good in the world. However, despite the obvious implications of American intervention, some would also say that the narrative weaved by Kinzer is far more complex than suggested.
...am War is not just history but the fundamental part of our history. Therefore, it needs to be taken seriously. Only if we take it seriously, can we prevent ourselves from doing the same mistakes again. It also teaches how the war policies and authorities can blind us from the real reason behind the war. It is important to also know the enemy and plan accordingly. One can clearly see that higher technologies can go wrong when accompanied with failed strategies. Most important of the all it makes the readers reconsider their definition of just-war. Most important of all, “Working-Class War: American Combat Soldiers and Vietnam” by Christian G. Appy teaches us how education and economic advantages can help us from facing the worst.
The years 1961 to 1972 saw the American involvement in Vietnam. For a little over ten years, America sent its sons off to fight for an unknown cause in a country they knew little about. When the United States finally pulled out of Southeast Asia, many were left scratching their heads. Over 58,000 young men died without really knowing why. Although it is a work of fiction, Tim O’Brien’s Going After Cacciato expresses the views of those who spent their lives in the jungles of Vietnam.
War is the means to many ends. The ends of ruthless dictators, of land disputes, and lives – each play its part in the reasoning for war. War is controllable. It can be avoided; however, once it begins, the bat...
Published in 1961, Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 is a satire of war with a twist. Heller wrote his narrative nonlinearly. Although certain critics described the novel as “disorganized, unreadable and crass”, the mismatched chronology complements Heller’s style of writing and draws the reader’s interest. One key point of Catch-22, the catch-22 paradox, makes use of the nonlinear structure to encircle the reader in the contradictions. In addition, Heller’s style of writing provides a point of viewing different from most novels. While the narrative may seem complex and overwhelming at first, the reader learns to appreciate the subtleties of Heller’s labyrinthine plot.
September 11, 2001, Osama Bin Laden decided to “wake the sleeping giant.” The US immediately sent SOF units and CIA officers to recon the area and meet with the Northern Alliance. The primary battle leading up to this operation was Tora Bora, which was absent of conventional forces. Up until this point, the war on terror was predominantly a Special Operations fight along with Air Force for overhead support.3 SOF and the Northern Alliance had already displaced Taliban forces out of many towns and villages in northern Afghanistan to gain control of key terrain. Key towns in northern Afghanistan including Taloqan, Konduz, Herat, and Mazar-e Sharif took only three weeks to clear.4 The SOF units were making huge impacts across the country calling in air strikes. At the same time the SOF units were diligently...
Adams, Michael C. C. The "Best War Ever: America and World War II" Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 1994. Bailey, Ronald H. The Home Front, U.S.A. Time-Life Publishing, Chicago, IL. 1978 Bard, Mitchell G.
Preston, Richard A., Alex Roland, and Sydney F. Wise. Men In Arms: A History of Warfare and its interrelationships
The relationship between conventional and guerilla operations was a key element of the Vietnamese communists’ “Dau Tranh” strategy to fight and win the Vietnam War. A brief description of the Dua Tranh (meaning struggle) strategy is appropriate since it was the basis for North Vietnam’s success. The strategy consisted of an armed struggle and a political struggle. The armed struggle began with Stage One hit and run guerilla tactics to “decimate the enemy piecemeal and weaken then eliminate the government’s administrative control of the countryside...
The world’s history is majorly shaped by mega wars that happen both inside and outside the boundaries of individual nations. Almost every sovereign state in the world had to forcefully liberate itself from its colonizers and oppressors mainly through warfare. For instance, America had to fight a long and exhausting revolutionary war against the British before it could attain its independence in 1783, likewise is the fate of many other nations. It is important to understand the two distinct types of wars that exist and their implications. Guerrilla warfare and the conventional military warfare are two types of war that are very different in their execution and military approach. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the similarities and differences existing between the American war in Vietnam and the American Revolution (Vetter, 1997).
- - -, ed. "The Anti-War Movement in the United States." English.Illnois.edu. Ed. Oxford Companion to American Military History. 1st ed. Vers. 1. Rev. 1. Oxford Companion to American Military History, 1999. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. .
It is somehow strange for today’s reader to find out that the situation with America’s foreign affairs hasn’t changed much. As some clever people have said, “The History book on the shelf is always repeating itself.” Even after nineteen years, Americans think of themselves as citizens of the strongest nation in the world. Even after the September the 11th. Even after Iraq. And Afghanistan.
This book is written from a perspective foreign to most Americans. Historically, American students are taught from a single perspective, that being the American perspective. This approach to history (the single perspective) dehumanizes the enemy and glorifies the Americans. We tend to forget that those on the opposing side are also human.
When comparing and contrasting U. S. military operations and capabilities with regard to regular versus irregular warfare it is important to understand the definition of irregular and the spectrum of conflict. In recent history, the term “irregular warfare” has been used interchangeably with or alongside insurgency and counterinsurgency warfare. This usage and comparison is too narrow. ...