Listerine Advertising Analysis

911 Words2 Pages

In the words of the great stand up comedian Eddie Izzard, “Never put a sock in a toaster”. Although this quote is completely unrelated to the topic at hand, it has captured your attention. Now the topic that I will be addressing in the following essay is the issue of whether or not it was ethical to point out the flaws of consumers in advertisements in the 1920s. From what I have observed, it seems that it was completely necessary and therefore I would say was ethical, since it didn’t seem to harm anyone too severely.
In the mind of Roland Marchand, “a leading late twentieth-century student of advertising”, write about what he has gathered through his lifetime along the lines of advertisements in his essay Advertising the American Dream. From
In this poster, Listerine shows us a young woman sitting alone, ignored by the guy she seems to be quite fond of. Listerine was clever and decided to exaggerate upon the term “bad breath” and call it something far more fearsome, “Halitosis”. It is the biggest word upon the poster along with the slogan, “Don’t Fool Yourself” and “unpopular” but at the bottom, the most important word, “listerine” (Primary Source #3). It was the clever use of text size, “Scare Copy”, and the emphasis of your popularity. With the combination of all the main factors, Listerine was quickly bought by nearly all individuals with low self esteem eager to get the individual of their dreams. They also saw this poster from a standpoint of fear that was instilled on the readers when Listerine advertised that you’d become unpopular and that you would be turned down by the guy who you are crushing on. But like most “Scare Copies” they provided the consumer with a solution to this nightmare issue, they offered their product as the solution. So, as you can see that for the product to sell successfully they had to target the emotions of the consumer and make them feel like they had to buy the product, whether it was to protect their popularity or to seal the deal with the individual of their

Open Document