Lisa Selin Davis Internet Trolls Analysis

738 Words2 Pages

“Internet Trolls” by Lisa Selin Davis explains that Internet Trolls are online commentators who write inflammatory or derisive things in public forums, hoping to provoke emotional responses from others. These people spend time and energy engaging in virtual hate. Even outside of internet trolling, discussions sometimes turn into arguments, that often turn personal. A troll can disrupt discussions on social media by broadcasting bad advice, and damaging the feeling of trust within the community. Trolls feed off the reactions of their victims because their agenda is to take pleasure in causing trouble. Three different types of troll causes are “the moral crusader”, “the disinhibition effect” and “emotional dislocation.”

First, we have the moral crusader, this is a person who always tries to "right" a situation. In the end these moral crusaders just end up being worse than the troll because they are trying to prove everyone else wrong in order to uphold their skewed view points. Unfortunately, an acquaintance of mine, Monica, often falls into this category. One day, a few years ago, she was particularly expressive when a few people were having a discussion about abortion on Facebook. Monica thought she was defending my …show more content…

Online anonymity sometimes creates a sense of a community without the consequences. “People feel alone when they’re typing on a computer, even if they’re in a public “place” like a chat room on Facebook or the comments section of an article.” MIT professor Sherry Turkle calls this “being alone together” (159). I had a high school friend named Steve, he would spew rude comments just for fun at everyone else's expense. He made derogatory comments towards a close friend of mine for being homosexual. Most of Steve’s comments rolled off my back and I took them as jokes, but this was far worse than anything he ever said to me. As a result of this, I haven't spoke to Steve in over three

Open Document