Due to the advancements of technology, social media is becoming a routine part of our daily lives. It comes as no surprise that Becky calling you an expletive online hurts your feelings in the real word. The rate of cyberbullying grew proportionately in regards to electronic communication’s advancement. It is due to this, that multiple people began questioning whether social media is to blame for the notable increased occurrence of cyberbullying, sparking fierce debates. Cyberbullying is a social phenomenon that appears to have no clear instigator, but according to directors of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman and Cyndi Silverman, the blame falls toward social media sites and its “dark underbelly”. While Foxman and Silverman argue …show more content…
Both authors develop valuable arguments that differ drastically, but the solution lies in the cultivation of the future.
In their joint essay, Social Networking Sites Can Be Forums for Cyberbullying, authors Abraham Foxman and Cyndi Silverman claim that the internet has become a tool that bigots and Anti-Semites in particular wield with the intention of spreading hatred. Although the reference is slightly outdated, its relevance is still prominent today. While the subject matter is if social media is the culprit, the authors zero in on the consequences and measures lawmakers should take to prevent aforementioned consequences from occurring. We see this specifically in the last sentence of their essay, “We must act now to ensure that those who would engage in harassment or bullying – whether on the street or in cyberspace – will face real-world consequences for their actions” (Foxman and Silverman). What’s so
…show more content…
In Kate Harding’s essay, Social Networking Sites Cannot Be Blamed for Bullying, she focuses on deflecting the accusations made against social media all while stating that a bully is a bully no matter the circumstances. In particular Harding references a report that claims Facebook was considered the common denominator in regards to a cafeteria fight. Harding repudiates the claim almost immediately in the following paragraph by stating that there are numerous other factors that could have caused the fight, despite the fight’s origin stemming from a post on a particular child’s Facebook wall. Although it is not explicitly stated, Harding is clearly displeased that social media has been made the scapegoat. Being a blogger for Shapely Prose and a frequent contributor on Salon.com; there is a hint of bias as her work tends to revolve around social media and the internet itself. Harding’s language and use of words while she is countering Facebook’s slander shows how emotionally invested she is in the matter, justifying said bias. “Just as Facebook is not causing the death of genuine friendship, it is also not causing the birth of high school enemies,” Harding emphasizes. Granted, the claim she made was designed to end all arguments vilifying social media, its context contradicts itself. By claiming Facebook does not bring about the end of genuine friendship directly implies that some friendships made on Facebook are very much
...gle network (443.) Some schools use material from Myspace and Facebook in their judicial proceedings while others turn a blind eye to the site (442.) Through the ineffective use of rhetorical tools and the cognizant arrangement of this essay, Fleming fails to manage the distance between herself and the audience with the flow and fluency of the article. She also does not establish her credibility and portray her scholarly credit through her citations of literature and quotations from experts. Fleming also does not present the audience with two analogies enabling them to make logical conclusions.
Bullying has always been a worldwide issue faced in many schools, neighborhoods and public places. In the past, bullies targeted their victims by acting tough and intimidating in person. As our society advanced in technology, the types of bullying advanced as well. The creation of the internet and social media sites now allows bullies to now hide behind their computer screens to torment their victims. Social media negatively affects our society more than it benefits us because it has created cyberbullying. Cyberbullying has become a worsening issue in our society that is difficult to prevent. We need to reduce our usage of social media networks in order to decrease cyberbullying on the internet.
Cyberbullying is defined as behavior online that is “repeated, hostile, and severe with the intent to embarrass, threaten, or harass”, and it has become a serious problem. With the new popularity of social media and technology, victims of bullying have been finding it impossible to escape the onslaught of rude and embarrassing comments. Because of this, Congress has been trying to pass a law that states that people should be held responsible for the comments they make. Individuals should be prosecuted if the cyberbullying endangers someone's life, or severely affects the victim. First, cyberbullying can lead to embarrassment and shame, which can be amplified by the wide audience.
Simmons, Rachel. "Cyberbullying Is a Growing Problem." Policing the Internet. Ed. Peggy Daniels. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Cliques, Clicks, Bullies and Blogs." Washington Post 28 Sept. 2003: B01. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.
Virginia, Bendel Draa, and D. Sydney Tara. "Cyberbullying: Challenges and Actions." Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences 101.4 (2009): 40-6. ProQuest Central. Web. 12 Dec. 2012.
Facebook is a setting where matters of supreme seriousness collide with the most trivial of affairs. These matters include serious topics such as the riots in Egypt, and exceedingly casual matters like what I ate for breakfast this morning. In many cases governments around the world must sort through the masses of information to determine what is serious and what is casual. In the case of Anthony Elonis, the U.S. court system has been asked to determine if Mr. Elonis's statements threatening to kill his wife are credible. In my opinion, Elonis, whose wife has recently left him, has shown through the context of his repeated verbal attacks on Facebook, is guilty of threatening his wife's life.
Cyberbullying is simply the use of technology and its accessible tools to harass, hurt and embarrass the targeted individual repeatedly. Stopcyberbullying.org (n.d.), a dedicated organization to prevent cyberbullying and promote awareness, has defined cyberbullying as the use of the internet and mobile devices or digital technology such as text or instant messaging, e-mail, and/or post blogging by adolescents or teens to repeatedly threaten, harass, embarrass, torment, humiliate, or likewise the targeted adolescent(s) or teen(s). The 21st century has promoted and forced our teens to become very knowledgeable with the use of technology in addition to social media use and access. The array of social media medium includes Twitter, Facebook, and the even low-key Formspring—a medium that offers “total anonymity” to users (Holladay, 2011, p. 5). Even though ...
Because cyberbullying is a relatively new phenomenon, there is some degree of variance in its definition. In its early inception, cyberbullying was thought to be limited to the internet. However, the rapid creation of new technology tolls has expanded the boundaries to include cell phones, instant messaging, chat rooms, and email (Campfield, 2006). Campfield (2006) conducted a study of middle school students to determine the incidence rates of cyberbullying. She found that nearly 70% of students were involved in cyberbullying in some capacity, as a bully or victim. In a similar study, Li (2007) found that 39% of students have been involved in cyberbullying, while 52% were aware of a peer being harassed through electronic m...
Facebook and other social media platforms have brought communication across the world to a whole new level. The rise of social media has created a place for children to communicate with others in both a positive and negative manner. Although it has made a positive impact on American youth, it has also contributed and exacerbated bullying in our schools. This new form of bullying, often referred to as cyberbullying, has created an around-the-clock atmosphere where bullying can occur even when school is not in session. Many professionals have sought to address the negative aspects of social media and have worked to develop a solution to bring cyberbullying to an end.
As we are living in the age of technology, we are seeing our youth being victimized by a new phenomenon of bullying, called cyberbullying. Cyberbullying is defined as the use of information and communication technologies such as email, cell phones and pager text messages, instant messaging, defamatory personal Web sites, and defamatory online personal polling Web sites, to support deliberate repeated and hostile behavior by an individual or group, which is intended to harm others. Cyberbullying can also employ media such as PDAs, blogs, and social networks (Beckstrom, 2008). This form of bullying is progressive because it can happen instantly due to the technology involved, whereas traditional bullying tends to take longer to evolve and happens
Mickie Wong-Lo and Lyndal M. Bullock, in their encouraging attempt to intervene in incidents of cyberbullying, have recommended many ways to deal with it. In their article entitled “Digital Aggression: Cyberworld Meets School Bullies”, they asserted that children do not acquaint their parents with their activities on the Internet and as a result parents do not know how to address similar situations (67). According to Kowalski, parents ought to follow “reporting techniques, which includes knowing when to ignore, block, or react, being mindful of the language being used and respond appropriately;” (qtd. in Wong-Lo and Bullock 68). In other words, the authors rightly emphasize that systematic supervision and knowledge can be valuable measures because parents will monitor children’s use of Internet and will be able to provide appropriate guidelines just in case a danger arises (Wong-Lo and Bullock 68). Moreover, as Keith and Martin argue, “[…] incorporating popular youth technology would be to teach youth how to use a social networking site to promote themselves in a positive manner that would appeal ...
The world would be a better place without you, you should go kill yourself. People often forget that there is somebody else behind the screen on the other side. The twenty-first century led to the development of several innovations, most notably the internet and social media. Despite its numerous benefits, people’s reliance on social media has spawned a new and dangerous concept called cyberbullying. Whether it is spreading rumours or sharing an inappropriate image of someone over the internet, cyberbullying is evident in this newly technology driven world. It is especially worrying when fifty percent of adolescents experience cyberbullying sometime during their lives and ten to twenty percent experience it on a regular basis
Thomas J. Billitteri’s “Cyberbullying” sees social media as a cause of bullying and states out of the teenagers using social media, forty percent have a least once claimed to have been cyber bullied. Child advocates view the incivility from television reality shows to the political arena as growing to a point where youth have learned it acceptable to humiliate other people as a form of entertainment. This attitude is commonly found on commentary sections of social media and news websites. The article points out the responsibility social media sites takes in contributing to and preventing cyber-bullying. Working with individual states and law enforcement, Myspace has tried to help to stop harassment and cyber-bullying. Meanwhile, the social media website Juicy Campus was solely made to spread gossip that is hurtful (Billitteri “Cyberbullying”).
Public opinion is often emotional rather than rational, so it is extremely easy to be incited and would possibly cause cyber bullying, which means to attack one person or a small group of persons by using offensive language. The damage caused by cyber bullying to a person is not virtual but real. An article from PR Newswire called “Cyber Hunting and Cyber Bullying” tells a st...
Most of us have heard the saying “sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me”. With today’s technology, that saying may no longer hold true. Studies show that in the past five years, online bullying has quadrupled (M. Ross, 3). The technology has given bullies a whole another proposal for their actions; virtual name-calling can have harsh effects on the security of kids and teens in today’s society. An online bully is someone who sends messages via technology, hides behind that keyboard and uses words or pictures to embarrass and bully their target.