Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of Stalin in Russia
Joseph stalin leadership
Impact of Stalin in Russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of Stalin in Russia
Lenin's Death as the Beginning of a Period of Struggle for Leadership between the Leading Bolsheviks Lenin’s death marked the beginning of a period of struggle for leadership between the leading Bolsheviks, at the end of which Stalin emerged as the undisputed and unchallenged dictator. Divisions in the party over the future of the Revolution enabled Stalin to position himself in a place of power, providing him with opportunities to rid the party of his opponents from the left and the right. The situation that the party found itself in 1924 was better suited to Stalin’s personality for a number of reasons. Stalin was very practical minded, even though he was not an intellectual like his rival Trotsky. He was able to adapt to situations to suit his motives, which is clearly seen when he presented himself as Lenin’s chief mourner and closest friend at his funeral by reading out the eulogy and carrying Lenin’s coffin. He therefore presented himself as the heir to Lenin’s legacy. Moreover, Stalin, though not a theorist, was an effective and shrewd administrator, a quality that earned him the nickname ‘Comrade Card-Index’. While his comrades underestimated him, Stalin was able to use his administrative skills to build a large bank of information against his opponents, giving him the ability to blackmail people to follow his orders. Stalin had obviously realised the potential power in the post of General Secretary in an increasingly bureaucratic party, as others had rejected the job as dull and uninteresting. This was a position he had held since 1922 and it was ... ... middle of paper ... ...ful that without this post Stalin would have been able to outmanoeuvre his rivals in such a way, as controlling the votes and securing his support allowed him to assure the majority beforehand to ensure success. Stalin’s personality was most suited to organising the down fall of his opponents and though the issues that divided the Bolshevik party were not deeply ideological and irreconcilable, Stalin magnified them so that he was able to remove his rivals in the struggle for power. The personality of his opponents, such as Trotsky, did not suit to winning the struggle, and a mixture of Stalin’s strengths and his opponents’ weaknesses allowed him to succeed. The result of his efforts was that the coalition formed in 1924 ceased to exist and Stalin stood as a single dictator, free to implement his policies unchallenged.
The Seizure of Power by the Bolsheviks in 1917. How did the Bolsheviks seize power of the Russian Empire in 1917? They were able to do this as a result of taking advantage of the current political and social situations in the country at the time. Through such decisions as disbanding the army and siding with the majority. the peasants, through such promises as land, food, equality and peace.
The Transformation of Bolshevik Position Between February and October 1917 Most historians think that the Bolshevik’s position went from playing almost no role in February 1917; they had only 150 members in the Pultilov Works which had 20,000 workers, to taking control of the country in October by a combination of luck and skill. It was said of the Bolshevik party in early 1917 that “The Communist Party existed solely in the leaders.” Many historians think Lenin’s leadership was the joint main reason for making the party into the leading revolutionary group in Russia, along with the luck the Bolsheviks had in the circumstances under the Provisional Government. A few historians claim Germany played a major role in the Bolshevik’s road to power. The Germans helped many previously exiled revolutionaries to get back to Russia when the Tsar abdicated and the Provisional Government came to power from March onwards, in the hope that they would end the war.
so a treaty would be a minor set back if Germany lost the war to
‘The provisional government was brought down with barely a shot fired.... ... middle of paper ... ... It was hugely significant as Trotsky’s failure to pursue the leadership of the communist party with any great intent saw Stalin rise to power and ‘old bolshevism’ fall and was the dawn of a new era for the communist party in Russia.
The Success of the Bolsheviks in Gaining Power in Russia by 1922 In February 1917, the Bolshevik party was small and irrelevant. The leadership was abroad and there was little consistency of purpose among the party in Russia. However, by the summer of 1922, the Bolsheviks had become the dominant force, and a new communist state had emerged from their success. The purpose of this essay is to explain this transformation.
There are many people who have lived through and within the Bolshevik Revolution, so there are a multitudinous variety of perspectives, thoughts, and insights about the revolution. The Bolshevik Revolution is known for many things; some say that the revolution helped women become free of control, and others proclaim that it did nothing but continue to hold women captive of their desired rights. The Bolshevik Revolution article states the side of a history professor Richard Stites, who argues yes the revolution benefited the women whilst the other side is declared no the revolution did no justice for women at all, which was argued by a Russian scholar, Lesly A. Rimmel. The opposing arguments both create an effective view on the revolution, and
that was required to be done was 'to issue a few decrees, then shut up
Bolsheviks' Seizure of Power in 1917 There are many factors that help explain how and why the Bolsheviks managed to seize power in 1917. It was a combination of long and short term causes that together, created a revolution. The political system itself was long overdue for reform, but with a weak Tsar, the economic and social conditions became worse and worse. In 23 years, Nicholas II dropped from the glorious ‘Little Father of Russia’ to prisoners of his own country, hatred and despised by the majority, for the suffering and unhappiness he had helped create. There were many long-term causes that gradually led up to the revolution in 1917.
In 1905 , Russia had a prerevolution that was put down of the Czar. Instead of learning from this prerevolution, Czar Nicholas II, made a very big mistake by in not introducing some reforms to correct the problems. So because of his actions, the situation grew worse. In 1917, the Russians were fighting in World War I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent along with economic hardships caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards. A temporary government was set up to decide on what kind of government Russia was gonna set up. Two political parties were set up. The Bolsheviks were one of the two. The leader of the Bolshevik party was a man named Lenin. Lenin was a firm believer of the theories and ideas of Karl Marx. So with his slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land", Lenin gained the support of the peasants and gained control of Russia and setup a communist state.
In 1917 the Bolshevik’s overthrew the Provisional Government causing Lenin to be elected chairman of the new government under Bolshevik rule. Russia was the first state to be under socialist rule in the world. Lenin was able to defeat a weak government and seize power. Lenin, with the help of Leon Trotsky, led the Bolsheviks into a new age in Russian history. The two halted any opposition set on conquering them after they took power. They defeated the “White Army”, consisting of anyone who opposed the Bolshevik government. These groups were the Mensheviks, Social Democrats, loyalist to Tsar Nicholas II, Constitutional Democrats or (Kadets), Social Revolutionaries and those in favor of the Provisional Government. On top of all of these groups who were against Lenin, he had to fight off the advancing German Army who was getting closer to Petrograd (St. Petersburg).
Exploring Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917 The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in Oct/Nov 1917 due to a number of reasons, some contributing more than others. At the beginning of the year, they did not seem to have much chance of winning power due to low support and no strong leadership. However throughout the year things went the Bolsheviks way and their fortunes changed dramatically for the better. The Kornilov Revolt helped the Bolsheviks in more than one way.
On March 3, 1918 Russia lost 1/3 of its fertile farm lands, 1/3 of its
Lenin and the Bolsheviks Replacing the Provisional Government as Leaders of Russia by November 1917
The Rise of the Bolshevik Party On the night of October 25, 1917, the Bolshevik Party of Russia seized control of the Winter Palace in Petrograd without firing a single shot. However, this silent successful opportunity had been in the works for many years. The Bolshevik party rose to power in Russia by giving in to the needs of the people, having superb organizational skills, and their ability to take advantage of a weak provisional government, especially after the Kornilov Affair took place. The combination of all of these conditions enabled the Bolsheviks to take control of Russia and keep her in its iron fist for years to come.
According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.