Laughing Wild Play Analysis

554 Words2 Pages

Play Review of Laughing Wild I am exploring the potato monologue from the play Laughing Wild. In this play, there are two characters, a man and a woman who are not named in the script. There are three acts within the performance that illustrate to the audience, the different perspectives of these two individuals trying to survive in the madness of New York City. The potato monologue that I will be exploring is spoken by the man during act three of Laughing Wild. Act One is titled Laughing Wild and is all about the Woman in this play. She is smart but struggles for peace and is a troubled lady who commonly has intense outbursts about people she dislikes, such as Sally Jesse Rapheal and Mother Theresa. Woman starts by talking about her …show more content…

He is trying to adjust to having a positive perspective but is failing at doing so in a comical way by using declarations and reflection. Man is about 35 and enters being kind yet anxious to talk about what he learned from positive thinking in a “personality course” he took. Man is intelligent, but has trouble keeping his positive attitude. His thoughts continue to go off into fears, angers and frustrations towards injustice. The man then tells the audience of a bizarre woman he met in the tuna fish aisle at the supermarket who struck him for no reason. He tries to come up with ways that he could have acted differently so that she would not have hit him, but is convinced that none would have worked. He also goes into telling the audience about his job at a magazine and accidentally brings up his bisexuality. This brings him to talk about the Christians that think God was punishing the gay people by developing AIDS. All of Man’s relatives are dead, but the ones that are not, he does not want to talk to. Finally, he attempts to have a positive outlook again, and starts talking about a New Age event he went to called the Harmonic Convergence. The Man then ends urging the audience to join him in

Open Document