Language In The Iliad

840 Words2 Pages

(4.1. SCW) Homers “The Iliad" refers to a genre of the heroic epic poem and has traces of oral folk poetry of 8th century BCE in Greece. “The Iliad" does not really describe the most important events during the Trojan War, only a couple of insignificant battles that happened during the ten-year siege of Troy. This poem is about the feelings of Achilles, Patroclus, Hector, Priam; the description of their hopes, disappointments and loss, that’s what made Homer the first, and one of the greatest European poets.

The poem describes only nine days, but in a great detail. This is in fact the greatness of the poem “The Iliad”. The language of Homer is unique, and no one ever could create any poem that big with such a great description of nine days. …show more content…

Who among the Greeks can ever obey your commands after this, either on march on in battle?” (SCW 4.1. p44). This is the begging of Achilles monologue to Agamemnon that frightens him with taking the Achilles slave-girl away from him. The way in which Achilles talks to the king shows that he does not see Agamemnon as someone higher rang than him. Later, in his monologue, Achilles refers to his previous achievements and that he does not need to follow king any more. This part shows the Homer respected the king, but not agreed with his total superiority above others. Furthermore, we get a sense and Achilles mentions it, that he has a huge support of Greek people, so the king cannot really do anything to him. That shows in Homer perspective the relationship between Kings and Heroes of that time. It adds significance to the poem, as we see that king’s words and deeds could have been criticized.

I do strongly believe that “The Iliad” of Homer was, and still is a lighthouse for poets, artists of the ancient and modern world. Homer was the first genius to who could accurately convey suites of the characters of his heroes; their complexity and contradictory relationships. Homer created a new philosophy of life that we think about when talking about ancient Greece. He praised life in its fullness; even when there is tragedy and war, life is still something great and …show more content…

SCW) Caligula and Claudius were two Roman Emperors that were in power one after another. Even though they were coming from the same dynasty, Julio-Claudian, they were completely different people. Different points and facts about their life described in source 6.3. portrays how it was to live in the Roman Empire during those times.

Caligula was considered to be mad, otherwise he would be the monster of the ancient Rome. He relocated all government power to himself, coming to absolute monarchy at its closest. His proclamations of being a god, construction of a gold statue of himself and dressing it in the clothes he was wearing this day (SCW 6.3. p75) give a clear idea about his obsession with himself. From the facts known about him, his reign was one of the craziest times during the Rome history.

Claudius was totally different to him. He was “modest, unpretentious man who refused to take the title of Imperator…” (SCW 6.3 p75). After the reign of Caligula, the people of Rome thought all the new rules will be like him, but they were wrong. After Caligula death, it was the Claudius turn to rule. He would reconcile all his ideas and deeds with senators. He was more a philosopher and civilian governor, rather than an emperor of the Roman Empire. People did respect him for everything he was doing for them, and was one of the most loved

More about Language In The Iliad

Open Document