Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of literature to the construction of history
Belgian imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The novel, King Leopold’s Ghost written by Adam Hochschild, creates the main idea by shedding light upon the dark side of human history that incorporates tyranny and slavery. It is in the nonfiction category bringing back the time of King Leopold II, King of Belgians, and how he owned the Congo Free State for over twenty years. He used it to exploit their main natural resources of ivory, helping Belgium. In order to achieve the wanted result: torture, maiming, and terror were used to scare the slaves to work. It was not until the natural resources were exhausted did the objections from powerful countries result in a change. Henry Morton Stanley, an explorer, was sent by Leopold to make treaties with the leaders so that Leopold II could take …show more content…
The Congo Free State was personally owned by King Leopold II and was suffering torture everyday. On page 80 it displays a hair of it, “Stanley was a harsh taskmaster. ‘The best punishment is that of irons,’ he explained in one of his letters to Brussels, ‘because without wounding, disfiguring or torturing the body, it inflicts shame and discomfort.’” It was not until other countries came in did the punishment lessen. WIth the help of human rights organizations, the British, and many others, the Congo was able to attain democratization and be free from the Belgians. One person to take a huge stand, questioning what the Belgians were doing was Morel. At the age of twenty- eight, he quit his job to take up full time work of stopping the cruelty of the people of the Congo. Page 213 elaborates, “Morel knew he had taken a momentous step. ‘I had launched the boat’ he wrote’, ‘and there could be no turning back.’” Soon after, people of the Parliament like Sir Charles Dilke spoke out strongly. THen there was humanitarian group like Anti-Slavery Society and the Aborigines Protection Society that preached Christian humanitarianism applying it to denouncing brutalities. The novel ends at the result of King Leopold II’s death, the transfer of the Congo to the Belgian colonial rule, and the first few years of independence. Important to be noted, …show more content…
The novel evokes the feelings of hatred within me for Leopold, but it makes you want to read more. For me, even though reading a chapter nearly everyday was a time struggle, it did not seem like a chore because at night I would just sit in my bed reading. History and nonfiction books, take you back to a different time where you feel as if you are apart of history, the novel previously stated included. The characters came alive while I was reading because the events are well shown. I believe that everyone who has a love in history should read this. It is such an amazing read that shocks you at moments, which keeps it interesting. Through all of the torture there was there was also heroes. To compare two stories, when most people are little they are aware of the firebreathing dragon, the hero, and the princess. While reading, that story came back to me but as different characters. The dragon was King Leopold, the heroes were the human rights campaigners, and the princess took on the slaves in the Congo. My point being that the story shows a whole journey that the Congo had to face. I believe that King Leopold’s Ghost is an amazing novel that everyone should read because even if you are not the story type of person, it still instills a lesson that greed
The most important part of this tale is the creation of what might reasonably be called the world 's first human rights movement. Hochschild brings the history alive by providing details of a vast array of different characters. George Washington Williams was the first bravest campaigner and he was the person that initially sounded the alarm. However, as an African American, he was ignored largely. Edmund Morel was a young British shipping agent, whose suspicions were aroused when he first noticed the imbalance of trade to the colony while working at the docks. He led the major effort to uncover King Leopold’s crime. William Sheppard was another brave African American, as well as a Presbyterian missionary who risked his own life bringing the first-hand evidence of King Leopold’s violence to reveal to the rest of the world. Roger Casement was an Irish patriot, diplomat as well as the hero of the tale. He played an important role in anti-Leopold movement. He was also an significant figure in the Irish independence movement. Unfortunately, he ended up executed in the London gallows. The efforts of these men contributed together to put large pressure onto King Leopold. As a result, Leopold had to determine to turn over the Congo to the Belgian
Alas, in 1961 Patrice Lumumba was assassinated by a US- sponsored plot 7 months after independence, and replaced him with a “puppet dictator named Mobutu” (Kingsolver). In her book, Barbara Kingsolver surfaces a forgotten part of our nation’s history in the exploitation of the Congo through her main characters, the Price family, who are missionaries sent to the Kilanga village. Through characters’ narratives that “double as allegories for the uneasy colonial marriage between the West and Africa” (Hamilton, Jones), Kingsolver creates a relatable way for her readers to understand the theme she is trying to convey, which is “‘what did we do to Africa, and how do we feel about it?’” (Snyder). Kingsolver began with this theme and developed the rest of the novel around it, just as she does with her other works, and sticking with her trademark technique, she utilizes her book as a vessel for “political activism, an extension of the anti-Vietnam protests” she participated in college (Snyder).
I found it very interesting and educational to learn about the history of Uganda, a country often forgotten by the Western World. Before reading this novel I had no idea about the struggle that Indians and Africans underwent during this countdown. As a result of this novel I also learned more about the issues of systematic racism and the various downsides of class systems. Before this novel I had learned about class systems, such as the caste system in India, but by infusing history with the struggles of a young girl really helped me connect with the themes in a stronger way.
Adam Hochschild's "King Leopold's Ghost" is a lost historical account starting in the late 19th century continuing into the 20th century of the enslavement of an entire country. The book tells the story of King Leopold and his selfish attempt to essentially make Belgium bigger starting with the Congo. This was all done under an elaborate "philanthropic" public relations curtain deceiving many countries along with the United States (the first to sign on in Leopold's claim of the Congo). There were many characters in the book ones that aided in the enslavement of the Congo and others that help bring light to the situation but the most important ones I thought were: King Leopold, a cold calculating, selfish leader, as a child he was crazy about geography and as an adult wasn't satisfied with his small kingdom of Belgium setting his sites on the Congo to expand. Hochschild compares Leopold to a director in a play he even says how brilliant he is in orchestrating the capture of the Congo. Another important character is King Leopold's, as Hochschild puts it, "Stagehand" Henry Morton Stanley. He was a surprisingly cruel person killing many natives of the Congo in his sophomore voyage through the interior of Africa (The first was to find Livingston). Leopold used Stanley to discuss treaties with African leaders granting Leopold control over the Congo. Some of the natives he talked to weren't even in the position to sign the treaties or they didn't know what they were signing.
The book King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa is written by Adam Hochschild. Adam Hochschild is the author of many books. He teaches writing at the Graduate School of Journalism at the University of California at Berkeley.
The book, King Leopold’s Ghost, is a second-hand account of one of the biggest crimes against humanity in history. The author, Adam Hochschild, explains the story of Leopold’s Congo in colonial Africa in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century’s. The accounts of the slavery and the inhumanities are told in vivid detail, and give an image so cruel and gruesome that they are only comparable to those of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany. After reading the book, the only question that was in my mind was how is this the only time I have heard of this? According to the book, this atrocity must never be forgotten, but it was, and in my opinion it should be taught in schools.
In King Leopold`s Ghost, the author Adam Hochschild conveys many attempts to challenge the actions of King Leopold`s control in the Congo. This was to reach an international audience at the time of the 20th century. Protestors depended on a variety of writing techniques to make their case successful. For example the use of direct letters to officials, published “open letters”, articles in newspapers, and public speeches. These protesters were George Washington Williams, William Sheppard, Edmund Dene Morel, and Roger Casement. These protesters became aware of the situation in the Congo in different ways. They also had diversity in how they protested through their writing. Although Edmund Dene Morel and Roger Casement share a comparative approach.
I would recommend this novel to anyone who enjoys historical fiction books where the characters learn life-altering lessons. I also feel that people of all ages would enjoy this book because it’s messages and theme was very positive. While I did enjoy this book, I think I will not be reading another historical fiction novel for my upcoming book response.
When Leopold came to power in 1865, he was incredibly disappointed at Belgium’s lack of power in the imperial world. Every other western European nation by had this time had taken on colonies as part of their empire; and therefore had been acquiring incredible wealth due to their new markets and exploitation of the native peoples they encountered. Belgium, itself, was a small country, and unlike their neighboring nations, they had not yet entered into the colonial scene. This all changed when the famous explorer Henry M. Stanley accepted Leopold’s proposal to return to the Congo acting as an agent of the crown whose mission was to obtain the signatures of all the native chieftains living in the Congo. Using despicable and manipulative tactics, Stanley was able to acquire over 450 treaties which paved the way for the declaration of nearly one million square miles of the Congo River Basin as the property of King Leopold II.
During the 17th century, slavery was a widely used commodity with the Europeans, little do people know however that African kings also had and accepted slavery in their own nations. King Nzinga Mbemba of Congo and the King of Ouidah had similarities on the issue of slavery; they tolerated the use of slaves. Congo’s king had no contingency with slavery; in fact, he had slaves in his country. When the Portuguese were purchasing goods in Congo, the king had men “investigate if the mentioned goods are captives or free men” (NZ, 622). The fact that the king differentiates the men between ‘free’ and ‘captives’ illustrates that not all people in Congo are free. Whether these captives are from the country of Congo or not, they are still caught and held all across the nation against their will. King Mbemba kept slaves because the population of Congo was vastly declining due to the slave trade. In his letter, he pleads with the king of Portug...
There are several things that I like about this book. First off, I love historical fiction, and this is the genre of this book. Also, despite the author being too descriptive, the book went at a steady pace. For me, pace usually determines whether I will read the book or not, and I never really hesitated, or thought about changing books.
While Leopold II, the King of Belgium, desperately wanted an overseas colony, The Belgian people did not share his enthusiasm; which created the feelings of neglect and apathy Belgium had towards Congo. The Congo Free State, established “in the margins of the Berlin Conference” in 1885, allowed Leopold to “gain international recognition of his possession” which he had begun to take control of since the 1870s. However, while Leopold was securing control of the Congo, the Belgian people were not interested in controlling colonies, as they believed that colonies “would merely soak up resources that would be better used for social purposes at home.” Thus, the Belgian people decided to solve the problem of having an unwanted colony by separating the Belgian government from...
One can easily note the physical and sexual violence brought upon the people (black and white) of Congo after independence, but we must locate the other forms of violence in order to bring the entire story of Patrice Lumumba to light. The director’s attempt at bringing the story of Patrice Lumumba to the “silver screen” had political intentions.
This began an era of immense fear for the Congolese people, known as the “rubber terror”. Due to King Leopold's demands, and the people of the Congo found themselves valued as chattel, whose only use was for labor. Several repercussions occurred as a result of the treaties between the African chiefs and the Belgians, not all of which were a positive impact on the inhabitants of the Congo (Ankomah).
As Marlow passes through the waters of the Congo, it is easily visible the trouble of the natives. “Black shapes crouched, lay, sat between the trees, leaning against the trunks, clinging to the earth half coming out, half effaced with the dim light, in all the attitudes of pain, abandonment, and despair.” (20) Show that the holding of these colonies has started. The soldiers have come in and taken the inhabitants and are destroying them and taking from them the one thing they deserve over everything, life. The imperialists seem to not care about the Africans and are just there for their land.