Kindergartners Get Little Time To Play Summary

1374 Words3 Pages

Over the years, kindergarten has become less play oriented and more academically focused. While some believe that this is good for the students because they will be learning more and will be more prepared for 1st grade, others believe that the play time they are eliminated is doing more harm than good. In the essay, “Kindergartners get little time to play. Why does it matter?”, Christopher Brown believes that by eliminating this play time, the students are missing out on chances to grow not only academically but also socially and emotionally. Brown states, “Giving children a chance to play and engage in hands-on learning activities helps them internalize new information as well as compare and contrast what they’re learning with what they already …show more content…

Another essay with similar ideas to Brown’s is “What happened to kindergarten?”, by Jen Curwood. In this essay Curwood relates the curriculum of kindergarteners today compared to kindergarteners from years in the past. She acknowledges this change in academics and states, “Indeed, just a decade ago, only 15 percent of kindergartners were readers. If we go back 30 years, the number shrinks to only 5 percent.” She believes that this increase in curriculum is making it hard for students to learn about academics, as well as make time for learning about people and the world around them. Curwood also brings up how technology has affected kids over the years. She states, “A 2003 study from the Kaiser Family Foundation found that children under 6 spend as much time with television, computers, and video games as playing outside.” This means that even at home children are not getting as much playtime as they should be. She relates this information back to the argument and believes that this lack of playtime at home increases the need for playtime in schools. Curwood shows similar views to Brown but provides more examples why play time is needed in this day and age particularly. I agree with her stance because over the years with technology advancing, it is getting more and more difficult for kids to use their imagination to problem solve. Which makes a student’s ability to sit down and learn that much …show more content…

When I was in kindergarten we were allowed three recesses. This seems like a lot compared to today's students who are only allowed one fifteen-minute recess. During my recesses I do not remember focusing on academics. I was usually playing with friends and working on problem solving without even realising it. Most of the time we would play two hand touch football. At first glance this does not seem very academic, and to be fair it wasn’t exactly. I was not learning academically but I was learning in other areas. Playing sports is a great way to build teamwork, as well as learning how to work together to solve problems. In the classroom I was learning how to solve math problems by myself, which was not giving me a chance to try and solve problems with my peers. This playtime gave me the chance to work with friends and build relationships, which is hard to do in only 15 minutes. So, while I believed that I was giving my brain a break from learning, I was actually still learning in different areas. My experience with recess leads me to believe that allowing playtime throughout the day is not only a good thing for learning academically, but is also very important because it gives the students a chance to work on other areas of development that are usually brushed over in school

More about Kindergartners Get Little Time To Play Summary

Open Document