Kimmel Summary

441 Words1 Page

I agree with Kimmel’s thesis that the ways the rules of manhood have been constructed that only a few believe that they are truly the most masculine. Disempowers the majority of American men through discrimination. The reason I agree with his thesis is because it’s true the way that we as men are taught from how a man dresses, talks, and walks is ingrained into us at very early ages. That those that don’t follow the status quo are seen as un-manly. Personal story my father like most grew up being taught the usual men don’t show emotion and men dress a certain way almost militaristic only wearing colors like navy’s, blacks, and greys. An if you were to wear another type of color it had to be a very dark form of that color. So if you were going to wear a green or purple they would have to be dark couldn’t be …show more content…

My girlfriend at the time notice I only had dark cloths so she bought me this bright almost sky blue t-shirt and I liked it. My father on the other hand did not and every time I would wear it would call it my “gay” shirt. I continued to wear it and it wasn’t until I got to college that I started buying brighter types of cloths an my father just accepted it. He even changed himself because funny story last summer my father bought those types of shorts mentioned in Kimmel’s essay. So because I went outside of the rules of masculinity my father was there to police me and try to put me back on them just like Kimmel says a man’s friends police him and let him know when he is being un-manly. Richard Fayerweath Babcock, Join the Navy poster I think does a good job illustrating what Kimmel was saying about manhood being equated with power over other people and things. The poster is clearly supposed to be like a cowboy on one of those mechanical bulls. Showing a sailor trying to get power over a torpedo. This is evident by the reins being seen on the torpedo but, in reality the torpedo has the power over the

Open Document