Kant's Theory Of Obligation And The Ethics Of Abortion

1323 Words3 Pages

Abortion is the ethical issue where there have been many cases that women have had to get them illegally or were not given the option to get an abortion. Utilitarianism is the theory in which the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons (Utilitarianism). The theory of deontology states we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles and rules regardless of outcome (Kant). Utilitarians would be on the side of aborting the child in order to reach the maximum amount of happiness for the greatest number of people whereas Kant’s theory would be okay with aborting in order to be moral by fulfilling the sense of duty to keep the baby. I will argue that abortion is moral using Mill's utilitarianism theory that it is okay to abort the baby in order for the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.
Abortion, by definition, is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo, resulting in or caused by its death (Abortion). Abortion has been around for years, and is one of the top most discussed issues in America where approximately 1.3 million abortions performed each year (Jensen). In the United States, 9 out of 10 abortions are performed in the …show more content…

Using this theory we would receive the maximum amount of happiness for the maximum number of people. If we were to use Kant's theory that saying abortion is moral then we would be saying that murder is moral too. I would say that the best decision would have to be the Utilitarianism theory because that would be in the best interest of everyone surrounding the woman especially the fetus. I believe the circumstance of the pregnancy outweighs the decision of being moral or

Open Document