Juror 3 Essay

The conflict management style that is adopted by Juror 2 is accommodating and the conflict strategy used is resolving.Throughout the movie Juror 2 displays high agreeableness with what is being said by others.With link to the discussion after voting scene where Juror 12 proposes that the discussion should go once around the table, Juror 2 did not have much of an opinion as to why the boy was guilty.In fact, he mentioned that he felt that they boy was guilty because nobody proved otherwise. This suggests that he has low levels of assertiveness and high levels of collaboration due to the factor that he is more likely to follow through with the ideas of others. His conflict strategy style would be resolving for he is a person with a need to maintain harmony which signifies his dislike for conflicts and hence he would prefer to be rid of the conflict.
One can argue though,

Displaying a high level of assertiveness and a low level of cooperativeness, Juror 3 has always been on the opposing end when it comes to bringing new points about the case. In fact when one looks at his usual communication style he is usually loud and rude to the other party when his points are not agreed with. An example of such would include the scene before he broke down after tearing his son’s photograph. He was then being all loud and aggressive in his attempt for a final bid to get the other members of the jury to see eye to eye with him to no avail. Another example showing this would be the conflict between Juror 7 and 3 where he made a rude comment to Juror 7 about dropping a quarter in the boy’s donation box.With a competing style, resolving is the only strategy that could complement it for it is all about a zero-sum orientation where it is a win or lose power struggle. In a strategy to attain that outcome, competing individuals can only look to resolving to remove the