Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

609 Words2 Pages

Ignorance: The People of Rome In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Antony’s ability to persuade the audience with his speech that both he and Brutus had spoken to, is far superior to his opposition. The way Antony went about giving his speech and the rhetorical devices that are used and the way he used to appeal to people's emotions and make them side with him. Whereas Brutus, on the other hand, his appeals to the crowd were to engage the audience within the speech, asking rhetorical questions to make it seem like the people were a part of this matter. Antony's rhetoric ultimately proves more compelling. While Brutus relies on a straightforward appeal to the Roman people's sense of logic and duty, presenting himself as an honorable man acting in …show more content…

In contrast, Antony’s speech subtly undermines Brutus’ claim of honor through the use of dramatic irony and emotional manipulation. By repeatedly referring to Brutus as ‘an honorable man’, Antony plants seeds of doubt into the minds of the audience. He then builds a strong emotional connection with the audience by recounting touching stories about Caesar, displaying Caesar's will, and highlighting his generosity(III,scene ii,181). Antony's ability to stir the emotions of the crowd, invoking their anger and grief, demonstrates a more persuasive use of rhetoric and Brutus's rational appeal. Mark Antony connects with the people on a deeply emotional level, using Caesar's cloak as a prop to physically show where the conspirators' daggers struck, turning Caesar's wounds into a silent but powerful testimony against Brutus and the others(III,scene ii,237). Antony's voice drips with grief as he recalls Caesar's generosity and their friendship, making the crowd feel the loss as their own. His calculated pauses and appeals to the common love for Caesar stir up feelings and

Open Document