Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

653 Words2 Pages

In the play, Julius Caesar, which was written by William Shakespeare, there is someone named Caesar. He had been offered to be crowned king three times but he denied. Cassius felt that Caesar should not be king and he tried to convince Brutus of this. The conspirators also felt this way. They felt Caesar would not be a good king. There had to be a way to stop Caesar from being king. Yes, it happened……… they killed Caesar. The conspirators convinced Brutus that Caesar should not be king, so Brutus eventually joined them on their plan to kill Brutus. One day Caesar is heading to the Senate House with all the conspirators around him. The ides of March have come. When he arrives at the Senate, Trebonius managed to pull Mark Antony away from Caesar so they could attack him, then Brutus and the conspirators came up and they began to stab Caesar. Caesar asks, “Et tu, Brute? then fall Caesar,” and he dies. A servant of Antony comes and asked Brutus if he could meet with him to learn why Caesar had to die and Brutus promised Antony would not be harmed. Brutus tells him that he had to die because he was destroying the republic. Brutus gives Antony …show more content…

Brutus did his speech first. The main argument of his speech for why he killed Caesar was because it was best for Rome. He stated, “ There is tears for his love;joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition,” which is an example of pathos because this shows his emotions towards Caesar. One reason Brutus felt Caesar could not be king because he would turn everyone into slaves. This is an example of logos because he is giving facts and logic to make them realize what is happening. He knew no one wanted to be slaves. Even though Brutus killed Caesar he told the crowd that he was Caesar’s friend which was a way he used ethos to show credibility. No one in the crowd was offended by what Brutus had said. Brutus did what was best for

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
384 Words | 1 Pages
In his play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare employs various rhetorical strategies such as direct address, repetition, and apostrophe in Antony’s eulogy to convince the crowd into believing that Caesar was a good ruler. His excellent use of rhetoric begins before he starts his speech through the establishment of familiarity. Before Antony begins his speech, he refers to the crowd as “friends, romans, [and] countrymen” to establish a personal connection, indicating the use of direct address (3.2.82). By referring to the crowd as “friends,” Antony removes any separation between him and the audience, establishing a close bond by choice. As it came first on his list, it emphasizes the importance of his friendship with the audience as friendship implies
Read More
What Are The Rhetorical Strategies In Julius Caesar
995 Words | 2 Pages
In speechcraft, orators have reverted to three basic concepts to persuade an audience; ethics, logic or emotion. All views are powerful, the path of emotion, or pathos, has stirred men to riots, the path of ethics, or ethos, has reminded people of the basest of their knowing and the path of logic, or logos, has calmed the savagest of beasts to men. No matter how human's develop, they retain the remnants of their not so distant cousins, animals. This is apparent when one takes note in the brain's ability to overcome human speech with basic emotions, to ‘render one speechless’ if you will. In these cases, much like animals, humans are propelled into action, leaving behind civilized concepts,
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
984 Words | 2 Pages
Antony reminds the plebeians about the time when he, himself “presented [Caesar] a kingly crown, / Which [Caeasar] did thrice refuse” (III. ii. 97-98). Using logic and reasoning, Mark Antony explains to his crowd that the fallen Caesar couldn’t possibly have been ambitious if he had refused the ticket to become King multiple times. Immediately afterward, Antony made sure to remind the plebeians that Brutus is an honorable man. This use of logos with verbal irony proves to be extremely effective. Since Antony presented the crowd with a compelling fact supporting that Caesar was not ambitious, the phrase “Brutus is an honorable man,” would be even more effective in allowing his audience to realize that Brutus and the conspirators may not be honorable (III. ii. 83). According to Brutus, the conspirator's sole reason to kill Caesar was because they believed he was ambitious, Antony’s statement would then be incredibly useful to turn the crowd against Brutus and his people. The plebeians would start to realize that noble Brutus and his conspirators might not be honorable and could potentially have their own, personal reasons to assassinate Julius Caesar. Once the crowd realizes that Brutus and the conspirators could have murdered their leader for no valid reason, they would begin to feel anger which are the building steps to starting a rebellion just like how Antony
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis: A Persuasive Balance
912 Words | 2 Pages
In this day and age, persuasion can be seen on almost any screen. The average American views thousands of advertisements every week. Most ads are simply pushed out of a person’s mind, but the successful advertisements are the ones that resonate with people. Some forms of ads are very annoying to those who put up with them constantly. Online pop-up ads, for example, are proven to do worse for products and business than no advertising at all! This is because this form of advertising does nothing to convince or persuade the person viewing the ad, and no effort is put into actually put into proving what it’s worth to make a point. Pop-ads make zero use of something known as “rhetorical devices”. In Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony both try to convey their point of view to a large audience of Roman citizens. One had a better speech than the other since he used “rhetorical devices” more effectively. Logos (logical; what makes sense), Ethos (ethics and morals; portraying similar beliefs and values), and Pathos (emotions; natural feelings that can be counterintuitive to logos) are the rhetorical devices that Aristotle
Read More
Julius Caesar Persuasive Paper
561 Words | 2 Pages
The book Julius Caesar is full of happiness, conspiracy, power, and betrayal. The people of Rome deeply loved julius Caesar and wished to make him their king. A group of senators however were not so fond of this idea and formed a conspiracy. The leader of this group was a man by the name of Cassius. In order to make sure that his scheme of killing Caesar would work and would look honorable he had to convince a senator by the name of Brutus to help. After being convinced that they had to kill Caesar to protect Rome from a tyrant Brutus joined the conspiracy and soon became the principal conspirator.On the day in which Caesar was to be crowned king he was on the way to the senate when he was stabbed by all the conspirators panic ensued and to convince Rome of their honorable intentions Brutus gave a funeral speech. Mark Antony, a very close friend of Caesar, gave his speech after Brutus had given his. Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive to the Roman people because of his outstanding use of pathos, sarcasm, and logos.
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
485 Words | 1 Pages
In Julius Caesar, Cassius pleads with Brutus to assist him in preventing Caesar from becoming a dictator. At the time, Caesar had ascended through the military ranks to become the head of Rome. As his power grew, so did his thirst to conquer others and establish himself as a dictator. While the Romans would have an effective leader, eventually Caesar’s hunger for power would cause him to attack anyone whom he deemed a threat to his power, such as Cassius or Brutus. Cassius assembles a group to prevent Caesar from assuming the role of dictator. Cassius provides arguments to Brutus in order to convince him to join Cassius’s rebellion.
Read More
Julius Caesar And Brutus Manipulation
593 Words | 2 Pages
William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a tragic drama, set in Ancient Rome about the horrendous death of Julius Caesar. Brutus, leader of the conspiracy against Caesar, begins as Caesar’s friend. Cassius, instigator of the conspirator, manipulates Brutus into killing Caesar. Brutus agrees to this plan because of his plans for Rome. The bond between these two connects when Brutus agrees to Cassius about killing Caesar for the best of Rome. Cassius, very power hungry, comes up with a plan that will succeed in both of them killing Caesar. They both rely on each other because they want the power that Caesar has been requested to make the best of Rome. This dream of making Rome better was manipulated by Cassius to Brutus. However,
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
686 Words | 2 Pages
In William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are used throughout Decius Brutus’s speech to Caesar to persuade him to attend the senate, and ultimately meet his demise. Decius Brutus uses repetition to directly play into Caesar’s ego and convince him to show at an event he was previously very unsure of. Decius first uses repetition to make Caesar feel as if he were an irreplaceable addition to the senate. He addresses Caesar as, “most mighty Caesar…” (2.2.74) multiple times throughout his oration. The repetition of “mighty” draws Caesar’s attention away from the fact that he really must not go to the senate and instead focuses on why he must. Caesar is known to be easily persuaded by the promise of attention or rewards. Decius
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
740 Words | 2 Pages
Rhetoric is the art for when the writer tries to inform, persuade, or motivate it’s readers. The goal is to change the others point of view or to make others take action. Plato once stated,” Rhetoric, it seems, is a producer of persuasion for belief, not for instruction in the matter of right and wrong.” Therefore, rhetoric could also be using direct language in a specific way for effective communication. Aristotle became the first person to use a form of rhetoric in his works and writing. Aristotle created the three known elements of rhetoric; logos, ethos, pathos. Logos means to use some form of logic, or the facts, based on evidence and reason. Ethos means to use a form of ethics, image, and being based on someone's character and credibility.
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
472 Words | 1 Pages
When constructing an effective argument, the triple rhetoric must be considered. In the tragedy of Julius Caesar, both Brutus and Antony attempt to persuade the people of Rome. They each take a different approach while trying to convince them. In the end, one speech is more successful than the other in the way that the crowd agrees with one.
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
1276 Words | 3 Pages
The murder of Julius Caesar is not only a turning point in history, but it is also a turning point in William Shakespeare’s play. This play features members of Roman society persuading one another to succeed in their own end goals, despite how life-threatening these goals may be. To accomplish these goals, the characters had to employ various rhetorical devices. In the play, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare suggests that rhetoric has the capability to influence change in the opinions within reality. This relationship between rhetoric and reality is reinforced by the close examination of Cassius’ encouragement speech, Antony’s funeral speech, and Cassius’ argumentative
Read More
Rhetorical Charms in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
1126 Words | 3 Pages
Imagine yourself listening to a political debate, undecided as to which leader you agree with. One candidate begins to speak about unjust societal issues, such as the horrifying amount of people in the world that do not have food on their table. The candidate also begins to touch upon the topic of taxes and how he will lower them if he is elected. You find yourself being persuaded in the direction of emotions and morals. The power of language used to appeal others is not only present in the modern world, but also in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by famous English playwright William Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar portrayed a story of how an aspiring leader, Julius Caesar, is assassinated by a group of schemers, lead by Marcus Brutus, who disagreed with Caesar’s decrees and ways of governing. Over the course of the text, it demonstrated the use of two rhetorical charms: ethos and pathos. While ethos refers to the moral and ethical appeal and pathos invokes to the emotional aspect, each one was evidently shown in the funeral speech for Caesar given by his best friend, Mark Antony. Prior to Antony’s speech, Brutus had given the plebeians a synopsis of what had occurred. However, Mark Antony knew that what Brutus had told the plebeians was false. In such manner, he allured the plebeians onto his side of the tragedy by touching upon ethical and emotional appeals.
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
830 Words | 2 Pages
Shakespeare is no where close to modern text but, he does know how to achieve a certain purpose in writing which is used today. The play, Julius Caesar, has two very important speeches that are uttered by the characters Mark Antony and Brutus while at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus’ speech, which shows what should be his sorrow for Caesar’s death that he allowed, uses the rhetorical appeal pathos in order to get his point across. This appeal provides emotion to persuade the audience into believing the speaker. In this case, Brutus is making an effort to get the people of Rome to believe that Caesar had to die. That’s why throughout the speech, he continues to state how he is mourning the loss of his friend. There are also rhetorical strategies
Read More
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
535 Words | 2 Pages
Antony asks rhetorical questions and lets the audience answer for themselves. Brutus uses ethos by stating that he a noble man and that is why the people should believe him but infact Antony questions his nobility by saying what Brutus said,” Brutus is an honourable man”(III.ii.79). In a way, Antony states what Brutus states to convince the audience by using examples that Brutus is wrong. Antony himself knows what kind of man Brutus is but lets the people figure it out on their own. In addition, Brutus uses logos by expressing that fact that Caesar died because of his ambition. This argument is severely under supported because his reasons are invalid and simply observations. Antony uses “did this in Caesar seem ambitious” to question Brutus’ argument (III.ii.82). Antony gives examples backing his argument like when Caesar refused the crown thrice to prove his humbleness. The way Antony convinces the people to rebel is by using pathos. He brings the audience in by stepping down to their level and showing them the body of Caesar. While Antony talks at Caesar's funeral, he pauses because” heart us in the coffin there with Caesar “(III.ii.98). When Antony becomes emotional, he reminds the audience about what injust event happened to the much loved
Read More
Julius Caesar - A Comparison of Brutus and Cassius
1631 Words | 4 Pages
In the play Julius Caesar, written and preformed by William Shakespeare, there are many characters, but two, Brutus and Cassius, stood out. The play begins in Rome where a celebration of Julius Caesar's victory over the former ruler of Rome, Pompeii. The victory leads to Caesar's betrayal by his jealous companions. Senators and other high status figures are jealous of Caesar's new and growing power, while others, like Brutus, fear the tyrannical rule Caesar could enforce. The conspirators, Brutus and Cassius being the most important, assassinate Julius Caesar and Marcus Antonius, better known as Antony, and Octavius Caesar, Caesar's heir to the thrown, revenge Caesar's death. Antony convinces the Roman populous to destroy the conspirators and eventually begins a war with Cassius and Brutus' armies. Both Cassius and Brutus commit suicide to save their honor and Antony and Octavius win the war. The characterizations of Brutus and Cassius show a distinct contrast in their character traits and motives for the assassination of Julius Caesar.
Read More

Open Document

Wait a second!

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis