Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

762 Words2 Pages

After Julius Caesar’s death in Act III, Brutus and Marc Antony spoke out to the people at Caesar’s funeral. Both speeches by William Shakespeare, given to the Roman people by the main characters in this Act, Brutus and Antony were both ways of trying to get the people on their side. In the speeches spoken to the crowd, they used a variety of the same three classic appeals such as Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. Each speech pretty much had the same structure but one was way more effective on the crowd than the other. And I am going to explain everything put into the speeches and the outcome of who won over the Roman crowd in the end. Brutus made his speech to the public first, he did not really connect to the audience on an emotional level like Antony did in his speech. He really just provided reasons and facts as to why he murdered Julius Caesar. Therefore, Brutus is using Logos throughout his speech, which appeals to intellect and reasoning. Brutus says “hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear.” (Anderson 831). He is trying …show more content…

Brutus said “ As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.”(Anderson 831) He is explaining that he loved Caesar but he had no choice but to kill him. On the other hand Antony gives his speech and multiple times he refers to the conspirators as Honorable men. Antony said “You all did see that on Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; and sure he is an honorable man.”(Anderson 835) He is saying that there is no proven facts that Caesar was ambitious and that he was a good man. But, without trying to talk bad about Brutus he states that he was really in the wrong for the murder and that Caesar was a good man that everyone

Open Document