Julius Caesar Climax

438 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of the play Julius Caesar

In the play Julius Caesar the climax should be after, when Antony gives his speech and persuades the people that something wrong has occurred. Many people will argue that this is not the case. After Antony gives his speech there is no return. In result of his speech there is war, death, and suicides. Antony’s speech gave a blow that wasn't undoable.

Mark Antony’s speech was very put together. It caused a lot of trouble for the conspiracists. His speech was adding air to the fire.The definition of climax is “the most intense, exciting, or important point of something; a culmination or apex”. Following the climax is the downfall of the story. He knew what he was doing, he talked about all the good things Caesar did “......But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world”. Imagine if America Bombed Russia that is exactly what this moment was. It was a point of no return. …show more content…

But this part really takes the cake. Caesar got stabbed okay? But was that the main point of the story? Nothing really happened after that. Antony’s speech sparked controversy, but so did Caesar's death. It was just that what Anthony did was way bigger. He caused war and bloodshed, he just kept on pulling and pulling until he got the people right where he wanted them. He was smart he got them on their side. Everyone thought loving the people “"Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more."(3.2.21-22) Everyone thought that the people would be understanding. You thought it was going to be the end. Antony had other plans that leads us into the end of the

Show More
Related

  • Julius Caesar Persuasive Paper

    561 Words  | 2 Pages

    The book Julius Caesar is full of happiness, conspiracy, power, and betrayal. The people of Rome deeply loved julius Caesar and wished to make him their king. A group of senators however were not so fond of this idea and formed a conspiracy. The leader of this group was a man by the name of Cassius. In order to make sure that his scheme of killing Caesar would work and would look honorable he had to convince a senator by the name of Brutus to help. After being convinced that they had to kill Caesar to protect Rome from a tyrant Brutus joined the conspiracy and soon became the principal conspirator.On the day in which Caesar was to be crowned king he was on the way to the senate when he was stabbed by all the conspirators panic ensued and to convince Rome of their honorable intentions Brutus gave a funeral speech. Mark Antony, a very close friend of Caesar, gave his speech after Brutus had given his. Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive to the Roman people because of his outstanding use of pathos, sarcasm, and logos.

    Read More

  • Pathos In Julius Caesar

    953 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare uses dramatic pathos, ethos, repetition and logos in the case of Antony to make his speech memorable in his effectiveness to sway the audience’s opinion. William’s use of Antony having the last word and subterfuge powerfully displayed a moment of literature memorable for the art of persuasion and manipulation. He veiled the true intent. The weaker written speech for Brutus had one effective point. The point that he killed Caesar for Rome. The breakdown of Brutus’s speech makes readers feel the tension and

    Read More

  • Antony's Ethos For Brutus Caesar

    620 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the people knew Caesar because of his friendliness and how nice he was to people he was able to get sympathy for his death. When the people remembered how good he was at one point they wanted to get vengeance on the conspirators,Antony had used persuasion and reverse psychology with the crowd to get mad at the conspirators. Brutus had not connected to the people as well because he did not give as much sympathy about Caesar's Death , and what he will give in return. Antony had touched the people when he sad said that he had money and land for the people of rome but he did not want to read it because it would make them made. Once that had hit there was no way Brutus could fight back against Antony's

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    Antony knew that the people of Rome had respect and love for Caesar and would do anything for remembrance of him. After Caesar's will was read, the crowd would, "go and kiss dead Caesars wounds, And dip their napkins in his sacred blood"(Shakespeare 827). This made the crowd see that Caesar was an important person and they lost someone very superior to Rome. In James A. Herrick's book, The History and Theory of Rhetoric: An Introduction, he states, "In rhetoric we find people acting symbolically in response to their motives, a general term in taking commitments, goals, desires, or purposes that lead to action"(Herrick 10). Antony had strong motivation to let the crowd know of Caesar's worth. The people of Rome realized that they needed Caesar, and Antony got the people of Rome to turn against the conspirators in response to his

    Read More

  • How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

    664 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare, was written based on the events that took place in Rome around 45BC. It reflects on the betrayal of Caesar, whom Brutus called his friend. Julius Caesar was not a cocky Roman general with a lot of pride, but was a man that denied the crown three times. After the death of Caesar, Brutus and Antony both prepare funeral speeches to speak on his behalf. As Caesar’s loyal friend, Antony’s speech portrays the type of person Caesar was, but lacks ethical and logical strategies. Brutus’s speech effectively explains why the killing of Caesar was for the good of Rome. He incorporates his personal beliefs, frequently uses emotion, and gives logic reasons, which makes his speech more argumentative than Antony’s.

    Read More

  • Antony's Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

    760 Words  | 2 Pages

    After Caesar dies in Act II, the excitement doesn’t end it gets even more intense when the speeches of Brutus and Antony take place. Antony and Brutus both gave speeches at Caesar’s funeral that were laid out with many uses of fallacies, logos, ethos, and pathos were used throughout these speeches. In one way, they had many similarities in their techniques. However, Antony and Brutus had many differences as well which put one of the speeches slightly above the other. Reading the play, in Antony's speech, he did well using logos, ethos, and pathos, along with fallacies.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his speech, Mark Antony claims that he “thrice presented [Caesar] a kingly crown,” and Caesar refused it each time (JC 3.2.93-93). This use of factual evidence directly negates Brutus’s obscene reason for killing Caesar and gives the illusion that Caesar cared more about the people than he did about the throne. This solid evidence shared to the Plebeians makes them not only guilty for believing Brutus’s explanation for killing Caesar, but also the sense of resentment towards the conspirators as there was no legitimate reason for doing so. As the speech continues, Mark Antony states that Caesar was “[his] friend, faithful and just to [him]” (JC 3.2.81-82). From the description Mark Antony shares to them, Caesar was a noble man, suggesting that the people of Rome should all righteously mourn for his death. Antony’s comments about Caesar are meant to draw the audience’s attention to Caesar’s righteous qualities and to view him as the man they once knew and loved. Later into the speech, Mark Antony reveals the dead body of Julius Caesar to the citizens of Rome, pointing out the “place [where] Cassius’ dagger [ran] through” and disclosing each and every wound (JC 3.2.171-172). Through showing the mutilated body of Caesar, Mark Antony emphasizes the brutality of Caesar’s killing and the content of the conspirators as they watched him die. Seeing Caesar’s mutilated body and hearing Antony’s graphic description of the killing had the sole purpose of appealing to the Plebeian’s emotions, which fuels their shame, grief and growing hostility towards the conspirators. Through Antony’s words and actions, the people of Rome not only experience the brutality of Caesar’s death, but also the feelings of guilt for trusting Brutus. Krystyna Kujawinska- Courtney

    Read More

  • Brutus Rhetorical Devices

    533 Words  | 2 Pages

    At Caesar’s funeral, Brutus lets Antony’s to speak to the public under two circumstances. Antony was allowed to give a speech only after Brutus’ speech was done and if he promises to not say anything against to the conspirators. Even though Antony promised to not say anything against to the conspirators, he was already planning to take advantage of giving the last words. Antony’s speech is considered as one of the best lines in Shakespeare’s work since it is dramatic significant. At first, it was not obvious how this speech can affect the story until the speech ended. Antony used variety of rhetorical devices in his speech to get what he wants.

    Read More

  • Why Did Julius Caesar Not Trust

    311 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Julius Caesar play’s plot entails of Caesar returned to Rome and assuming absolute power (leadership) over the Roman Empire after defeating Pompey the Great and Crassus which transformed rule of three to the rule of one to govern the Roman Empire. Caesar stated he did want the crown of the Empire. Although the Caesar represented most of the people there were a group of people who did not trust him and who he did not trust because they were loyal to others. He was not believed by the group of people. As leader you have to represent and bring all parties together to unite the groups. Caesar failed at uniting the people. Caesar did not listen to disapprovals and dissatisfactions from the ruling society. He also castaway the cautions of the

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Speech Analogy: Antony and Brutus

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar’s death was a tragic story in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Brutus with the conspirators(Cassius, Cinna,etc.) and Antony played important characters in the occurrence of his death. The day was to come, when Caesar’s death (ides of March) is to be announced at the capital in front of the people of Rome by Brutus, who offered Antony to speak after. Brutus, in his speech announced that he killed caesar for what he honestly felt was for the better . While Antony, says that actually all of them even including Brutus killed the ruler with envy. Both of these people also play an important role in the different views of Caesar’s death that the people of Rome see by their speeches using certain persuasive techniques in some effective and ineffective ways, having some similarities and differences, and with also setting a certain thought point for the audience at the capital.

    Read More

  • Mark Antony’s Remarkable Rhetoric

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    Through the whole of his spectacular speech, Mark Antony influences the crowd using his distinct diction. He is able to inculcate a fired up anti-Caesar mass of people, and he makes the populace believe that Julius Caesar’s death was a true tragedy. Antony gracefully applies his proficiency with ‘logos’ and ‘pathos’ to his speech and is able to adroitly gain followers. His strong reasoning and explanations allow the Romans to buy what he has to say. Antony’s ability to speak in a roundabout way is a key constituent of his speech. Withal, he is extremely humble and the way he plays down his prowess is impressive. Mark Antony puts all the parts of his remarkable rhetoric together, and the result is a speech for the ages.

    Read More

  • Mark Antony's Speech Analysis

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare play Julius Caesar, Caesar is assassinated, and the city of Rome becomes enraged, demanding the death of the conspirators that murdered him. Brutus, one of the main assassins, talks to the mob and persuades them to understand that they are at an advantage without Caesar, the tyrant, as the dictator of Rome. He then leaves Mark Antony, who has meticulous orders to not try to pin the murder on the conspirators’ selfishness, but can speak numerous praises about his superior. Mark Antony then speaks to the persuaded crowd about Caesar’s endeavors and the benefits that Caesar gave to the kingdom, giving everything that was necessary and more. Mark Antony’s speech riles the citizens of Rome to mutiny without actually revealing his personal intentions of wishing to do so. In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive that Brutus’ speech

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of Mark Antony in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    816 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare is the story of the assassination of Julius Caesar. Two speeches were made after his death, one being by Mark Antony. He uses many rhetorical devices in this speech to counter the previous speech and persuade the crowd that the conspirators who killed Caesar were wrong. Rhetoric is the art of persuasion and these many devices strengthen this by making points and highlighting flaws. Antony uses many rhetorical devices, all of which are used to persuade the crowd that the conspirators are wrong and Caesar did not need to be killed.

    Read More

  • The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, the story revolves around the various individuals who would vie for control of the Roman Empire. All of these individuals exhibit various attributes, values, and techniques in order to facilitate this goal, from Cassius’ intelligence, Brutus’ charm and honor, to Antony’s gift to drive a crowd. And although all three desire to become the new strongman leader of Rome, it is Antony who succeeds gaining the most control through his own specific talents, most specifically noted at Caesar’s funeral. At the funeral scene, Antony exhibits several qualities beneficial to a Roman leader, such as oratory and appeasement skills. The dialogue depicted in Act III, scene ii provides a valuable and insightful perspective on how these values were desirable for leadership in the late Roman Republic.

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar Climax

Open Document