Judith Butler On Complicated Writing

562 Words2 Pages

All writing is about communication including academic writing. In order to convey your knowledge and ideas to your reader, you need to write simple and precise. But some writers are deliberately writing complicated. One of them is Judith Butler, whose writing is known for being complicated and overly academic. So much so that she in 1998 won the Bad Writing Contest by the journal Philosophy and Literature. This lead to her writing a defence in The New York Times called “A Bad Writer Bites Back”. But not everyone agrees with her: philosopher Matthias Brinkmann wrote a blog post in 2016 discussing Butler’s arguments called “Judith Butler on Complicated Writing". So, what are the reasons for and against deliberately complicated writing according to Butler and Brinkmann? …show more content…

Brinkmann does not agree. According to him, language simply does not have that much influence on thoughts. Language can shape an idea to some degree, but never to the extend Butler claims. In my opinion the capability of writing simple is an expression of intelligence and understanding of the topic. It is possible that a topic can have a lot of special terms and complicated theory that makes it difficult to write simple, but that does not mean that it is impossible. Butler’s second argument is that since the radical writers’ target is to challenge the mainstream, they do so not only with content but also with the language. Thus, the complicated writing is meant to shock readers out of their habitual way of thinking of society. Brinkmann does not believe this. If the intention is to shock, the writing of the radical writers is quite tame. You would have thought the writers would be a bit more creative with form and

Open Document