It just correlates to how one feels emotionally. By carefully defining the two terms, people whose mental health is underway can also get the help that they need. Just because they are not suffering from a mental illness does not mean that they are exactly healthy, either. People who have mental health issues also need all the help that they can get. Relating
Experiments also do not provide adequate evidence on repression. Repression remains significant in the field of psychology and a cornerstone in psychoanalysis. Its comprehension is necessary for therapists, counsellors, and other professionals in the field. It helps in understanding patients with cases of repression; they can then be helped in unearthing and coping with the repressed memories. Through coping, they solve problems and gain control.
There are variations of basic research designs that are used for psychopathological research, but sometimes it may be unethical and difficult to use some of the methods, and at other times some methods may limit the interpretations that can be made about a psychological phenomenon or mental disorder. For example, true experimental conditions would be highly unethical to conduct to understand mental disorders. No one would like the idea of making someone pathological just to study the causes of a disorder. True experiments would be the most informative way to get a casual explanation about a mental disease, but that would jeopardize the well-being of the people, and the welfare of people is of priority. Quasi-experimental designs I feel are appropriate and acceptable.
It just correlates to how one feels emotionally. By carefully defining the two terms, people whose mental health is underway can also get the help that they need. Just because they are not suffering from a mental illness does not mean that they are exactly healthy, either. People who have mental health issues also need all the help that they can get. Relating to the
Rosenhan (1973) states that in psychology, abnormality plays a key role in diagnosing a person as mentally ill. However, the line that divides normal from abnormal is not clear. All behaviour lies on a continuum with normal, also called effective psychological functioning, and at the other end abnormal indicating mental illness. Mental health professionals look for bizarreness and persistence of the behaviour with a certain pattern over time. Social deviance, when a person 's behaviour violates expectations and norms.
Labels for the sake of professional classification have proven to be invaluable tools. They help psychologists describe psychological disorders, find initial causes for disorders, help outline possible future complications, and in turn aid in the development of beneficial patient treatment. Without being able to label these disorders, then the studies and treatments involved would be confused and disorganized. However, labels do have significant negative effects that can greatly hinder the outlook and opinions held by professionals, patients, and the general public. One must be aware of both positive and negative effects in order to use labeling and treat those who have been labeled in a way which will not shadow one’s thoughts and actions.
Dr. Neuman wrote an article on Psychology.com titled “Assertiveness vs. Aggressiveness” where he really highlighted the difference between the two behaviors. Dr. Neuman says: “being assertive means behaving in a way that is most likely to achieve one’s purpose.” This means that an individual who is assertive knows how to act according to the appropriate setting in order to reach their desired goals. An individual who is aggressive isn’t necessarily aware of their excessive dominant behavior and isn’t really driven by goals but by emotional turmoil. Assertion can be mistaken for aggression but it really depends on how an individual presents themselves. Unlike aggression, assertion isn’t a behavioral disorder but rather just a simple behavior.
How these people are able to behave this way and convince people that their behavior is ok. They are able to charmed their way into people’s lives only for their own selfish needs and once they are getting what they want they leave. What are the key symptoms of psychopathy which are signs that a person should be looking for when dealing with a person who is psychopathic. Another question is does the treatment or control of the psychopath rightly fall to mental health professionals or to the correctional system? These were some of the questions that were addressed in the book pertaining psychopathy.
The psychodynamic model looks at abnormal behavior from the unconscious and conscious mind and it is all from psychological and conflicts of the three parts of the personality, not from something physically damaging, unlike the biological model. With the behavioral model, clinicians believe that abnormal behavior is simple learned and to correct and change it, that too must be learned.
2. Are persons with MPD/Dissociative Identity Disorder responsible for bad actions committed when in an alter state? Why or why not? Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) Diagnostic criteria dictates that the presence of two or more distinct identities (each with its’ own relatively enduring pattern of perceiving, relating to, and thinking about the environment and self), as well as at least two of these identities recurrently taking control of the person’s behavior coupled with the inability to recall important personal information that is too extensive to be explained by ordinary forgetfulness. The disturbance must also be proved to not be due to direct physiological effects of a substance e.g alcohol or due to a general medical condition e.g complex partial seizures.