On Being Sane In Insane Places Summary

1463 Words3 Pages

On Being Sane in Insane Places Research Essay Julia De Angelis Due Date: 4th March 2015 Teacher: Gareth Rees 'On being sane in insane places' is a study by David Rosenhan in 1973 which attempted to test the reliability of psychiatric diagnoses and the treatment of those in psychiatric hospitals. He tested this by conducting a study in which eight 'sane' people attempted to gain admission into different psychiatric hospitals. They organised psychiatric appointments in which during their interviews they complained of hearing voices repeating the words "empty", "thud" and "hollow". Seven of the pseudo-patients were admitted under the diagnosis of schizophrenia and one under the diagnosis of manic depressive psychosis. Once admitted …show more content…

The notes gathered by the pseudo-patients were used to conclude how patients experience a psychiatric ward. However, the pseudo-patient's perceptions were biased as they do not reflect the needs and perceptions of actual patients. Rosenhan (1973) makes assumptions about what patient's consider is 'quality care' from a biased view, rather than establishing criteria that reflected authentic experiences of psychiatric patients. The study can be seen to have low ecological validity as it can be argued that the pseudo-patients aren't really insane therefore it may have been difficult for them to behave "normally" in the hospital environments. (Spitzer, …show more content…

It would have been difficult to take notes on all the aspects of the ward, forcing the pseudo-patients to make selections of what to record, introducing bias in the qualitative information collected. It would have been difficult to analyse all the data produced, especially when it is an unstructured observation, which would make comparisons between the hospitals and staff difficult. Furthermore, Rosenhan (1973) did not take into account common psychiatric practice, which required psychiatrists to admit a patient based on possible mental illness. Studies have shown that doctors and psychiatrists are more likely to make a type two error (call a healthy person sick) than a type one error (diagnosing a sick person as healthy) (Kirk, Kutchins,

Open Document