Judge Robin Camp Summary

597 Words2 Pages

This article focuses on a recent sexual assault case and the comments made by the presiding trial judge. The judge in question, Judge Robin Camp, acquitted a man accused of sexually assaulting a 19 year-old woman because he believed that the woman did not resist enough to warrant lack of consent. This decision was later overturned by the Alberta Court of Appeal on the grounds that Judge Robin Camp was ignorant regarding the notion of consent and based his decision on myths of rape. Judge Robin Camp was seen to place blame for the sexual assault on the victim and trivialized her trauma by insinuating that the assault may have only been some rough play. He was eventually thrown off the bench for his conduct and is currently pleading to the Canadian Judicial Council in order to properly hear his argument. The article further discusses how Judge Robin Camp may not be the only judge that has relied on stereotypical myths regarding sexual assault in their decisions. The article concluded with a statement by Associate Chief Justice Austin Cullen in which he stated that Judge Robin Camp’s behavior was in direct contrast to the principles of the criminal justice system and therefore should be removed from his judicial role.
II. My …show more content…

In particular the article exemplifies rape myths through the comments of Judge Robin Camp in which he argued that the victim enjoyed the rape and did not keep her “knees together”. I think that his views are highly prejudiced and ignorant of the realities of sexual assault. As such, I agree with the decision made by the disciplinary panel to remove Judge Robin Camp from his position as a judge. No matter how much he apologizes for his actions now, his comments were in direct opposition to the tenets of a fair and legal criminal justice system, and thus he should be

Open Document