John Locke was born in 1632. He earned his bachelor’s Degree in 1656 and a master's degree in 1658. In 1690 Locke’s An Essay Concerning Human Understanding appeared. From this came Tabula rasa. This then laid the foundation for environmentalism. Locke was an English philosopher who was regarded as one of the “most influential of enlightenment thinkers” and “important to social contract social” (Wikipedia). Locke died in 1704 never being married or having children. His theories are a part of what we practice today.
In 1962 Khomeini began to oppose the Shah’s government by organizing many religious leaders in a protest against the westernization of Iran, showing the people of Iran how horrible it was that Iran was leaving behind it’s traditional Islamic roots. This first act against the Shah kicked off the Iranian Revolution of 1979 and proved to the people that they could do something about the Shah and the monarchy that lead Iran at the time.
In 1979, the Iranian Revolution ended the Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi’s reign when Iranians forced him out of power and exiled him. Like in the illustrated novel, civil unrest was prevalent under the Shah’s regime. People, such as Mr. and Mrs. Satrapi, protested the Shah to demonstrate their anger towards their current government and ruler. The Satrapi couple’s reasoning for wanting the Shah to abdicate was the result of both internal and external factors that played out over a series of decades (Lecture, 11-30). The opposition to the Shah’s regime resulted from certain circumstances that include corruption within the government, significant western influence in the region, enforcing a strict social class structure, as well as the Shah violating the basic human rights of his citizens. Although this does not encompass every facet for why Mr. and Mrs. Satrapi to actively involve themselves in these anti-Shah demonstrations, it does consider some of the more prominent factors for them wanting to participate.
After the exiling of the Ayatollah, and the harsh supressing of riots, the Shah restored order by use of force. What became prevalent at that point was the need for a catalyst. A catalyst is someone who precipitates an event or movement; someone who stirs social unrest for a revolution. What this essay is trying to establish is to what extent the exiled Ayatollah Khomeini played the role of a catalyst in the 1979 Iranian Revolution. The Iranian Revolution happened over a course of a year from 1978 to 1979. The revolution included many groups such as the nationalists, women, students and Islamists, who all aimed to abolish monarchy rule and establish a new government that was fit enough to serve the people of Iran. The revolution had tinges of anti-Western culture. The groups had different aims, the secular aimed to establish a free, democratic state while the Islamists aimed to form an Islamic government. Strikes and marches broke out across Iran led by these different groups. Although there was civil unrest, social disdain and discontent, the movement lacked mobilisation. Different groups like the secular and the Islamic groups were revolting yet were unable to come together and act as a united force against the
The revolution started with a democracy movement and ended with a sudden creation of an Islamic state. Mohammed Reza Shah ruled Islam in the years preceding the revolution, and he is the primary cause of it. During his administration, he showed immense favoritism to his friends and relations. All power was clustered among those few. As the monetary gap between the poor majority and the rich minority grew, so did the distrust of The Shah’s regime among the poorer classes.
The Iranian citizen's hatred toward the shah grew as the years passed, until the first uprising in 1953. This rebellion was led
The historic Iranian Revolution took place in 1979. Iran was not always a strict Islamic state with a Theocracy. They were once ruled by a man known as The Shah. He began to waste money, created the Yes, Your Majesty party, attempted to modernization, and created the SAVAK.
The Egyptian revolution that occurred in 2011 has several lessons from which Egyptians and the international community can learn from. The revolution was characterized by violent events such as riots, demonstrations, plaza occupations, and civil resistance that were agitated by political, economical, and social factors (Abdou 93). Initial protests were stirred up by nationalism where individuals and organizations of different religious and cultural backgrounds had the common interests of fighting for social justice, freedom of all Egyptians, and respect for human dignity, which had been violated by autocratic regimes. Despite the high level of optimism held by Egyptians prior to the revolution, the outcome of the event has given a promise of further economic, social, and religious difficulties that the majority of the revolutionists failed to forecast before demanding for human rights through violence. Although the primary objectives of the Egyptian revolution were positive, it aroused the emotions of many people and motivated the growth of religious radicalization.
When a government violates the rights and fails to protect its citizens, it is the people’s right to instigate a revolution to revise the government as they see fit. Revolutions especially in the case of complete and utter corruption when leaders of the government are bought by coin and allow injustice to happen, it is the people who must respond and bring the wrongdoers to justice. When a government overreaches its authority and violates its citizen’s rights, the people must rise against tyranny and injustice around them, in doing this they begin the struggle for change in their world. However, in all revolutions the methods and reasons are different. Some fight economic class abuse, some fight government overreach, and others racial prejudice. Three excellent examples of these revolutions are the French Revolution, the American Revolution, and the Civil Rights Movement. By observing these three revolutions, one can see how revolutions make a difference.
In Persepolis, aspects of authoritarianism are shown during brutality at demonstrations, or when Marjane’s father takes forbidden photographs of the demonstrations at hand. Despite his attempts to modernize and failure to please Islamic fundamentalists, the Islamic Revolution began in 1979. The Shah was forced to step down due to displeased Iranians, especially from the religious Iranians. Around this time, Ayatollah Khomeini took advantage of specific groups, such as oppressed men and women, during the revolution to lead to his rise of power. He used all efforts to create a government solely based on Islam and religion, thus beginning post
In protest, they turned to the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, a radical cleric whose revolutionary Islamist movement seemed to promise a break from the past and a turn toward greater autonomy for the Iranian people. In July 1979, the revolutionaries forced the Shah to disband his government and flee to Egypt. The Ayatollah installed a militant Islamist government in its place. in October 1979 President Carter agreed to allow the exiled leader to enter the U.S. for treatment of an advanced malignant lymphoma. His decision was humanitarian, not political; nevertheless, as one American later noted, it was like throwing “a burning branch into a bucket of kerosene.” Anti-American sentiment in Iran
...revolution, political scientists warn that in case of disappointments, the country can turn into violence for the abused trust. Well, the people of Egypt spoke and may their wishes be implemented and if anything to go by, their spirited fight has awakened their neighbors in seeking democracy too (Tunisia and Libya).
In conclusion, the corrupt regime and poor leadership of Muhammad Reza Shah created social injustice which the population protested, and the economic failures of the government alienated members of the Iranian population and incited revolutionaries to action. The attempted secularization and Westernization of Iran furthered the people’s discontent, and Khomeini’s movement heavily criticised Iran’s close relationship with the West. In Iran as well as in the Middle East as a whole there was a desire for a return to Islam provoked by events such as the June War. All these social and political factors contributed to emergence of a revolution.
In Iran, when the protest movements ascended after the shah regime allowed space for political liberalization and dialogue, the Islamist saw an opportunity to gain popular momentum and they began organizing street protests just as the shah’s political power began weakening despite the support of Jimmy Carter’s human rights campaign. The Islamist movement was more directed to strengthen the public opinions about the Iranian awakening and how it participated to the people’s decision to go back to their fundamental origins. “The Islamists felt the time had come for revolt because the Iranian people were “awakened”_ that is, their consciousness had been sufficiently raised that they would engage in anti-regime protests” But the people’s awakening did not necessarily exist to answer Khomeini’s call to protest ...