John Dilulio's Theory Of Super-Predators

859 Words2 Pages

The theory of “super-predators” was a prediction that never existed and became a myth to society and criminologist after the fact that the concept that revolves around the myth of super-predators had already create chaos that led many states throughout the country to implement laws in protection for what was to come. All the misconceptions of the exaggerated fear and concerns came to pass and the credits slowly dissipate when the violent wave of events did not exist as it was predicted by the experts. The prediction was never coming to pass, but the consequences that was put forth to the community of such myth lingers within the targeted community because it categorized such group of people as the main cause of the super-predators.
So, what are super-predators? John Dilulio; then a professor at Princeton University of politics and public affairs along with other colleagues came up with the controversy theory based on statistics of juveniles which Dululio labeled as “super-predators.” He characterized the …show more content…

The predictions brought forth by Dilulio were a mistake and failed to predict the wave of crimes committing by juveniles. Juvenile crimes did not continue to get worse but in fact it got better which was the opposite from what Dilulio’s predictions of the super-predators. As the laws and penalties that was implemented to cracked down on juvenile crimes based from Dilulio’s predictions; crimes involving juveniles had already steadily declined attributed by the better policing of law enforcements, the decline in crack cocaine industry and the economy as it was beginning to be better itself. Admitting to his mistake, Dilulio issued mesa culpa, acknowledging that “demography is not fate and criminology is not pure science” because he was wrong in his prediction but the damage had already been done where laws had already been placed because of the super-predator myth

Open Document