Have you ever wondered how white people in the 1960’s would have felt if they were being judged due to their differences? In the video “Jane Elliott’s Blue Eyes Brown Eyes”, a 3rd grade teacher discovered a new way to teach the ways of discrimination and racism towards her students. Jane Elliot, the teacher, noticed that the Caucasian people were very ill-mannered towards people of different skin tones. This sparked an idea in her mind that would change kids’ lives forever. This idea consisted of all the students she possessed splitting into two groups, brown eyed kids and blue eyed kids. On the first day, the blue eyed kids were told how much better they were than those with brown eyes. Elliott pointed out specific children with brown eyes, who did not do certain things properly, convincing them that they had something wrong with their brains. …show more content…
These depreciated children had their test scores dropped in a matter of hours due to the fact that they believed they were actually the lesser of the two groups. While this group’s score and happiness plummeted, the group of blue-eyed children ascended in both test scores and happiness. They felt as if they were dominant as well as much smarter than they previously felt as a direct result of the teacher’s word. Since they were the dominant of the two groups, they decided to antagonize the other group of kids, calling them names that would put them down. One child with blue eyes claimed that he called another child with brown eyes a name in order to dehumanize him. This action caused a fight between the two former friends to break loose. This depicts the reaction of the brown-eyed children in the situation they were put in by Jane
This made the author dislike and have hatred towards the parents of his fellow classmates for instilling the white supremacy attitude and mind-set that they had. It wasn’t possible they felt this way on their own because honestly growing up children don’t see color they just see other kids to play with. So this must have meant that the parents were teaching their children that they were better and above others because there skin was
The story begins with Jodee’s description of how she was victimized in a 4th grade Catholic grammar school; coming to the defense of deaf children that were being treated cruelly. She supplied the school officials with names and was labeled a “tattletale.” No one would talk to her, recess was spent in anguish, and she would find garbage and spoiled food in her book bag. As she progressed into 5th grade some of the social atmosphere began to shift in subtle but profound ways. Being accepted into a clique was all that mattered. Instead of being admired for class participation, as in earlier years she was laughed at and labeled as “teacher’s pet.” She said the rules were simple “shun or be shunned—if you weren’t willing to go along with the crowd, you would become the reject.”
Blue eyed people are better than brown eyed people. Because of this, the brown eyed people will not talk to blue eyed people on the playground. Brown eyed people do not receive the five extra minutes of recess along with no right to use the drinking fountain. The brown eyed children are given a collar to wear to differentiate them. One of the brown eyed students explained her day by stating, “…you felt like you didn’t even want to try to do anything.” The second day, the students switched roles. First, Mrs. Elliott noticed that one of the blue eyed students did not wear his glasses. He was showing off his eye color. Once the blue eyed students put the collar on, everything changed. The teacher watched as the brown eyed students shaved three minutes off of their time for the flashcard activity. When asked why this happened, one of the students mentioned, “We just kept thinking about those collars.” Without the collars, they felt smarter. The blue eyed students also did a noticeably worse job on the second day. Mrs. Elliot quoted, “I watched wonderful, thoughtful children turn into nasty, vicious, discriminating little third graders.” Before the simulation began, Mrs. Elliot asked a few questions determining the importance of Black people
E. D. Hirsch and Lisa Delpit are both theorist on teaching diverse students. Both of these theorist believe that when teaching diverse students, teachers need to see their students for who they are. Seeing your students for who they are, means you look past the color of your students’ skin and recognize their culture. According to Stubbs, when teachers look at their students equally, no matter the color of their skin, then the teacher is considered colorblind (2002). Being colorblind is not a great thing because we should not treat all of our students the same, since each student is different. It is important to see our students for who they are because our classes are unique. Instead, our classes represent a rainbow underclass. According to Li, the rainbow underclass is the representation of families who are culturally diverse and economically disadvantaged (2008). In order to meet these student’s needs, teachers need to think about the struggles that each student face.
After watching the documentary, “A Class Divided,” I was very impressed by the lesson that the teacher was performing with her students. Discrimination is an issue that has been around for a long time dating back to slavery and probably before that. Over time, society has become more welcoming but discrimination still exists today and may never completely go away. By doing this exercise with her students, the teacher is changing the world. If a group of ten people went through this exercise, then they learn that everyone is the same and they stop discriminating based on race. Those ten people later go on and tell their children, friends, and family about this exercise and they may also have a change of heart. That number now changes from ten to twenty to thirty. In the documentary, the teacher mentioned that this exercise is hurtful to some people and should not be performed on everyone because of controversial issues and how it can be emotionally traumatizing for some people. A small group still does so much for a society to change and evolve. The brown eye, blue eye method has a large impact and I wish more people knew of it
One participant of Jane Elliott's workshop walked out after. one hour, another never returned from a quick trip to the bathroom. Their blue eyes did them in. In Elliott's world, brown-eyed people form. the majority, and they have the power.
Moreover, her argument relates to the historical events of US imperialism and to the term White Supremacy, the belief of superiority of the white race over others. History has also shaped the idea of discrimination, from the trade of African American slaves between European slave owners to Martin Luther Kings stand against racism. For instance, in the 1940s, psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark designed and conducted a series of experiments known as “the doll tests” to study the psychological effects of segregation on African-American children ("Brown At 60: The Doll Test"). In today’s world, social media became a source for controversial topics such as racism. As I was scrolling through the Facebook platform I landed a video that went viral when a white mother captured her daughters’ reaction on receiving black dolls as gifts for Christmas. The older one politely tries to accept it while the little one throws it aside and cries uncontrollably. I was questioning the parents’ motives because they were laughing and taking it as a joke. It frankly proves that some parents do not know how to inculcate their children on viewing people equally. It makes one question whether or not racially colorblind people
Murphy expresses how justifying bad deeds for good is cruel by first stirring the reader’s emotions on the topic of bullying with pathos. In “White Lies,” Murphy shares a childhood memory that takes the readers into a pitiful classroom setting with Arpi, a Lebanese girl, and the arrival of Connie, the new girl. Murphy describes how Arpi was teased about how she spoke and her name “a Lebanese girl who pronounced ask as ax...had a name that sounded too close to Alpo, a brand of dog food...” (382). For Connie, being albino made her different and alone from everyone else around her “Connie was albino, exceptionally white even by the ultra-Caucasian standards... Connie by comparison, was alone in her difference” (382). Murphy tries to get the readers to relate and pity the girls, who were bullied for being different. The author also stirs the readers to dislike the bullies and their fifth grade teacher. Murphy shares a few of the hurtful comments Connie faced such as “Casper, chalk face, Q-Tip... What’d ya do take a bath in bleach? Who’s your boyfriend-Frosty the Snowman?” (382). Reading the cruel words can immediately help one to remember a personal memory of a hurtful comment said to them and conclude a negative opinion of the bullies. The same goes for the fifth grade teac...
Looking out across the stone-paved road, she watched the neighborhood inside the coffee colored fence. It was very similar to hers, containing multiple cookie-cutter homes and an assortment of businesses, except no one was there was her color and no one in her neighborhood was their color. All of them had chocolate skin with eyes and hair that were all equally dark. Across the road to her right, a yellow fence contained honey colored people. She enjoyed seeing all the little, squinted almond eyes, much smaller then her own, which were wide set and round. One little, sunshine colored boy with dark straight hair raised his arm and waved his hand, but before she could do the same back her father called her into the house. His lips were pressed and his body was rigid, the blue of his eyes making direct contact with her
The film A Class Divided was designed to show students why it is important not to judge people by how they look but rather who they are inside. This is a very important lesson to learn people spend too much time looking at people not for who they are but for what ETHNITICY they are. One VARIABLE that I liked about the film is that it should the children how it felt to be on both sides of the spectrum. The HYPOTHESIS of the workshop was that if you out a child and let them experience what it is like to be in the group that is not wanted because of how they look and then make the other group the better people group that the child will have a better understanding of not to judge a person because of how they look but instead who they are as people. I liked the workshop because it made everyone that participated in it even the adults that took it later on realize that you can REHABILITAE ones way of thinking. The exercise showed how a child that never had any RASIZM towards them in the exercise they turned against their friends because of the color of their eyes. The children for those two days got the chance to experience both sides of DISCRMINATION. The children once day felt SEGRIGATED and inferior to the children that were placed in the group with more privilege. Then the next day the children that were placed in the privileged group were in the SEGRIGATED group. The theory is if you can teach a child how to DISCRIMINATE against a person that you can just as easily teach them how not to. Sometimes a person needs to feel what another person feels to understand how they treat people.
I agree with her outlook on her daughter's pre-school Cultural Diversity Day. Susan repeatedly tells her daughter's teacher that they are 100% American. Susan was born in America, as was her husband and their daughter as well. Teaching young children about where they came from at such a young age simply confuses them. I believe that you should let them grow up and get used to the way that American culture is before parents or teachers start shoving all these ideas into their heads. My main question is why is it necessary to teach children that they are different from their friends? On page 92 Konig states, “Later in the month, Miss Laura admits that her class is not quite getting the whole skin-color thing. ``I tried to show them how we all have different skin,'' she chuckled. Apparently, little Henry is the only one who successfully grasped the concept. He now runs around the classroom announcing to anyone who'll listen, ``I'm white!'' Miss Laura asked the children what color her own skin was. (She is a light-skinned Hispanic, which would make her skin color . . . what? Caramel? Mochaccino?). The kids opted for purple or orange. ``They looked at me like I was crazy!'' Miss Laura said. I just smile.” Young children don’t ...
Pecola’s conversation with her imaginary friend is one of the most crucial scenes in Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye. In it, a young African-American girl in the 1940s takes on the impossible task of trying to conform to societal expectations of beauty. The most damaging force is not racist white people but Pecola herself. She attempts imitating something she is not and never leaves behind the parasitic ideas of beauty that infest her thoughts. By asking the manipulative Soaphead Church to grant her wish for blue eyes, she destroys herself.
A reader might easily conclude that the most prominent social issue presented in The Bluest Eye is that of racism, but more important issues lie beneath the surface. Pecola experiences damage from her abusive and negligent parents. The reader is told that even Pecola's mother thought she was ugly from the time of birth. Pecola's negativity may have initially been caused by her family's failure to provide her with identity, love, security, and socialization, ail which are essential for any child's development (Samuels 13). Pecola's parents are able only to give her a childhood of limited possibilities. She struggles to find herself in infertile soil, leading to the analysis of a life of sterility (13). Like the marigolds planted that year, Pecola never grew.
The concept of "the bluest eye" symbolizes unattainable beauty based on the blonde-haired, blue-eyed model that permeates 1940s Lorain, Ohio. Morrison initially presents the concept with a literary device: In the first passage of the novel, Morrison frames and repeats the traditional "Dick and Jane" text, first with normal syntax; a second time with the same text repeated, but without punctuation; finally, the third time, all the text is repeated as one continuous word. Morrison's repeated references to this text show that the words, which trumpet a white and therefore happy family as the ideal, are rote; they are recited by all school children - black and white - without pause or any consciousness of what those words imply. Blind recitation inculcates the myth.
An unexpected twist, that Pecola’s bright, blue eyes would be the source of her blindness. Nothing pummeled at her mind more than her inexorable yearning for a physical trait exclusive to white culture. The porcelain-skinned children of storybooks taught her that beautiful, sparkling blue eyes were the golden key to beauty, and she retained this information well. She wasn’t the only one. Girls of colored skin have been pressured for years to strip themselves of their culture—mentally, emotionally, even physically—and not much has changed. Toni Morrison forces us to confront the formidable oppression pressed onto people of color by people void of it in her novel, The Bluest Eye.