James Cook Research Paper

1994 Words4 Pages

James Cook was born in Marton Yorkshire on October the 27th, 1728 as one of seven children of Grace Cook and James Wade Cook. By 1755 he joined the navy. He rose through the ranks rapidly and was given command over a survey vessel. With his vessel Cook’s mapped out parts of the St Lawrence River, surveyed Newfoundland’s coast and even recorded the eclipse of the sun. It was his accuracy of his surveys that led to Cook being made Captain for 3 major voyages . The first voyage was to observe the transit of Venus across the sun and the circumnavigation New Zealand. His second voyage was to prove if there is a continent in the South called Terra Australis. On his third and final voyage Cook had had to return a native man Omai to his homeland Raiatea …show more content…

They knew what Cook’s maps would be used for and how it put most of the world at a disadvantage. Those from the Present day know Cook’s mapping has put all of the world except Britain at a geographical disadvantage because other nations have not discovered and mapped the places Cook has been, so by the time they start voyages to discover new lands the British would have already found most of them. An example of how Cook puts all except the British at a disadvantage comes from a biography on Cook. “Many sailors noted Cook's stellar work with mapping and surveying and how extremely accurate his drawings were. It was those surveys that gave Cook a name, along with the information he carefully obtained from the observing and recording of the eclipse of the sun in 1766.” Because his mapping was extremely accurate the British trusted his maps from his voyages. With Cook’s maps British could send navigators to mapped locations and have the advantage of where not to search for undiscovered lands which the rest of the world does not have. So the present opinion does not believe Cook’s mapping made the world better because his maps were not benefiting the entire globe but instead only the British …show more content…

The British believed his contributions of navigation, mapping and landing on Native lands positively changed the world because his navigational abilities expanded global naval understanding, his mapping skills greatly contributed in creating the map of the world and land Cook claimed would be more successful under British rule. However the Natives, thought Cook’s navigating may lead to British exploitation of less developed lands, his mapping could bring more foreigners as they will have knowledge of their land’s geography from Cook’s maps and his landings brought diseases and suffering. Lastly the modern perspective knows Cook’s navigational prowess was useful it ultimately was used to benefit other British navigators. They understand Cook’s mapping was very accurate, but it puts the rest of the world at geographical disadvantage. Finally Cook’s landings resulted in land being conquered which put the Natives through terrible treatment for generations. To conclude, Captain James Cook had many positive contributions in his life, but they only benefited the British Empire and his negative impacts have caused grief to this very day so I believe Captain Cook did not

Open Document