D-Nice Brenner
Ittig
English Comp.
14 December 15
Jack the Ripper
Jack the Ripper murdered five women between the 31st of August 1888 and the 9th of November 1888. They were murdered in Whitechapel and Spitalfields in the East end areas of London, England. The murderer was never caught and because of this, their are many speculations about the killer's personality and motives.
Naming Jack the Ripper
There has never been a killer in the British history that rivaled as much gruesome as Jack the Ripper, a multiple murderer whose boldness deified the entire police department of London and held the whole city in terror for as long as the murders lasted. From the testimony of the many eyewitnesses certain probabilities emerge about the killer.
…show more content…
He published a book on January 1, 2014 about the famous murder Jack the Ripper called Naming Jack the Ripper. He bought a shawl, it was silk, large, damaged with pieces missing that has changed all history. The shawl had been passed down from the owner's family since the murder of Catherine Eddowes. Edwards did some research about Catherine's clothing he noticed Michaelmas daisies, after doing some research Edwards noticed the two dates people celebrated Michaelmas, one was the night of the double event and the other day was the night Mary Kelly was murdered. After meeting with a scientist Dr Jari Louhelainen did some examination on the shawl, finding out there was not only blood but with arterial blood splatter caused by slashing, and another stain, semen. Because of the age of the shawl they couldn't trace back any DNA. mitochondrial DNA which is passed from mother to daughter down the family tree. They found a women Karen Miller who was Eddowes great great great granddaughter. Miller agreed on giving them a sample of her DNA. Jari used nuclear magnetic resonance, and Edwards and Jari believed the shawl was made from the Huguenot silk weavers. The shawl was originated in the 1820’s, from a famous Russian shawl factory, Pavlovsky Posad. Aaron Kosminski a polish Jew, had fled London escaping russian pogroms years before the murders, was a main suspect to these murders. Edwards …show more content…
The shawl wasn't really a shawl unless Eddowes was extremely tall, thin and rectangular. Eddowes didn't own the shawl she pawned her own shoes walking around cold and whos knows with what filth and debris, in bare feet. If she owned such an expensive shawl, she would have sold that too. There is no records proving that the shawl was at the crime scene, also in the book it saying a police officer thought that a gift soaked in blood from a mutilated prostitute would impress his wife. How did the shawl get passed down through eddowes family if it was taken by the police officer. The shawl seems to be clean in pictures, if it was at the crime scene it would have been completely soaked in blood. The shawl was not at the crime scene, it was stolen by a policeman who wasn't there. It’s unbelieveable that the shawl has not been washed in over 126 years because people seemed to be so horrified by the blood stains. Who really knows that Catherine Eddowes blood is on the shawl or even Kosminski’s semen. The shawl was handled by two of Eddowes descendants also endless other people for photographs. Even Edwards had a picture taken with no sterile gloves, the shawl was touched breathed on and even spit on by numbers of people. It wouldn't come as a surprise is some of Eddowes dna was on it, it doesn't necessarily
The mystery of the Black Dahlia has interested people for decades, the murder happened mid January 1947. A body was found cut in half in a vacant lot on L.A’s South Norton Avenue. A police detective later said after seeing the crime scene “ I just can't imagine someone else doing that to another human being.”( “Black Dahlia” ), the crime scene was that gruesome. The murder victim was 22 year old Elizabeth Short, called the Black Dahlia by the murderer. The mystery got its public interest when the L.A.P.D couldn't find someone responsible for the
The murderer, whoever it was, wanted everyone to know who the victims were. “A card propped up against his foot gave the man’s identity — Rev. Edward Wheeler Hall, 41, pastor of the Episcopal Church of St. John the Evangelist in New Brunswick. The woman was identified as Eleanor Reinhardt Mills, 34, wife of
Investigating Why the Police Were Unable to Catch Jack the Ripper I believe the most important reason why Jack the Ripper was so hard to catch was because of the lack of evidence. In those days they did not have as advanced technology as we have today for instance, we have forensics where we can tell from a strand of hair who that hair belongs to. In those days they were only just learning the significance of footprints to catching a villain. Another part to this is that Jack the Ripper was so random towards who he killed the police could not find a link between the murders except that they were all prostitutes, which did not really help, although prostitute murders were not terribly uncommon. The press coverage to the case didn’t help much as they had forced the police to investigate ‘Leather Apron’ and this wasted a significant amount of the police time which, if spent properly, may have allowed them to uncover more information needed to catch the Ripper.
The case of Joseph Vacher was as well-known, more deadly, and even compared to, the murders committed by “Jack the Ripper” so much so that Vacher even screamed that he was “Joseph the Ripper”. This murder, whose identity was unknown at the time, left a trail of terror where ever he went, his capture became a career making opportunity for the investigating magistrates. After Vacher was captured a new branch of criminal interrogation was used to try to incriminate him in the murders that it was believed he had done. The major breakthrough in criminology came in the form of the methods that lead to his capture and identification.
How the Police Tried to Catch Jack the Ripper In the 1880s, the police were very different from the police of today. Their main propose was crime prevention and their methods their methods were very primitive Source F is a police leaflet, which was published after the murders of Elizabeth Stride and Kate Eddowes; it was written to aid the police in their investigation it was also written in a factual tone, it suggests that the police were appealing for any information regarding suspicious characters. Because of the timing of this leaflet shows the desperation faced by the police but for because of the many defects reasons the leaflet was not successful: The first being that they did not offer any description of the murderer at all, 'person to whom suspicion was attached'. The second being that they still assumed that the person was living in Whitechapel, when there was a large amount of evidence suggested that the murderer wasn't from Whitechapel (the fact that the murders were all done on the weekends or on Friday nights, which suggests that he had a job and came into Whitechapel to murder).
Most statements from witnesses claimed that, the 'Ripper' suspect must have been a white male, average or below average height, between 20-40 years old, did not dress as a labourer or homeless person and was right handed. They also felt he had accommodation in the East End of London, possible medical connections, may have been a foreigner, and also have a regular job as the murders took place at the weekend. Because this description did not single out anyone, it made it more difficult to arrest anyone as the evidence was very weak. Jack the Ripper was a clever man, as we can see from his Modus Operandi, as he managed to choose different locations for his murders, yet they were all very close to both public and police scrutiny. Even though they were supposed to be keeping a close observation over Jack the Rippers movements, they were too complex for them and the Whitechapel area was so vast.
Jack Laidlaw is a universe apart from other examples of detectives, he examines the more intriguing issues of how and why people can commit the reprehensible crime of murder and the harrowing aftermath of crime and violence. Jack Laidlaw can deeply understand people more than anyone could ever imagine. Jack Laidlaw is an odd sort of detective, and this is an odd sort of novel. He lives and works in the gloomy, cheerless heart of urban Glasgow; and he keeps the works of "Camus"," Unamuno" and "Kierkegaard"in his top desk drawer, "where other detectives would normally rather keep their secret stashes of liquor." Unlike many other detectives with uppity tastes in literature, no one congratulates him for this or encourages him in any way; the whole world tells him that However, he persists in trying to understand crimes as well as solve them: “You want to live as if the rest of the world was just a necessary evil and that you have to be a monster to be a criminal,it's not true, it's all in peoples concealed heads. That may be a nuisance to you.
The prosecution based their case on what they thought was a string of inconsistent statements Truscott had made, a mysterious abrasion on Truscott’s penis, and evidence that fresh bicycle tracks were found leading to Harper’s body. They also questioned why it was not until a day later that Truscott told police that he saw Harper get into a car on the night of her disappearance. The time of death was also a major contributing factor to conviction, as there were multiple witnesses to testify the timeframe of Harper and Truscott’s hangout. The coroner, Dr. Pennistan, testified that Lynne Harper had died between 7:00 pm and 7:45 pm on June 9th, 1959, this time frame was determined through examination of Harper’s stomach contents by placing them in a glass jar and holding the jar to a window for
After being identified as belonging to Helens, detectives extended their search and recovered numerous items, which included a blood stained coat which belonged to Helen along with dog hairs and carpet fibers, a bag of clothing belonging to Simms,, knotted electrical cord with strands of hair entangled, as well as a sweatshirt embroidered with the logo of a brewing company that ran a promotional campaign at the George and Dragon pub (Evans,
Although the true identity of Jack the Ripper has never been identified, experts have investigated Prince Albert Victor, Thomas Neill Cream, and Montague John Druitt as prime suspects. Based on facts and information given, the researcher found evidence that Jack the Ripper was Montague John Druitt. Druitt’s family, appearance, and suicide support the researcher’s claim. Ultimately, the obsession with the Jack the Ripper case will never perish.
Experts confirmed that there was no way of knowing how long Samantha's blood had been on the comforter. Because she lived in the home and two weeks before her death she cut her lip and scrapped her knee.
Jack the Ripper killed five women between the 31st of August 1888 and the 9th of November 1888. They were murdered in Whitechapel and Spitalfields in the East End areas of London, England. The killer was never caught and because of this there are hundreds on his personality and motives. No other killer in the British history rivaled that of the gruesome, mocking, utterly superior Jack the Ripper, a multiple murderer whose arrogance and boldness deified the entire police department of London and held in terror a great city for as long as he cared to roam its streets and slay at will.
The murder of Lorraine Kelly and Mary Pryor still haunts the town of North Bergen because their disappearance was strange and rapid. This case has been closed due to the lack of evidence but was reopened again after forty years for the purpose of acquiring justice and answers to the death of both teenage girls. The last person to have seen and spoken to Mary Pryor was her sister Nancy Pryor when she was told by her sister that she would be back by eight o’ clock the latest. For the purpose of hiding her and her families’ identity, after the murder occurred she moved out of Hudson County and didn’t divulge her married name or current locality of residence because of the frantic fear that the murderer may plan an attack to her and or family. Prior to their killing both teenagers used to reside at 76st and were active hitchhikers. Both victims were found in a wooded area in Bergen County known as Montvale, and it was evident that they were beaten, sexually assaulted, and strangled by force. As a result, when the bodies were found they were in an early state of decomposition which allowed the medical examiners to see visible evidence on the body such as sperm and marks.
“Jack the Ripper,” was the name given to an unidentified serial killer in the White Chapel district of London in 1888. The name came from a letter left at the crime scene, written by someone claiming to be the killer. The letter was believed to be a joke and thought to be written by a reporter in a deliberate attempt to heighten interest in the investigation.
In an article featured in the Philadelphia Inquirer on January 30, 1987, titled " A Woman's Wintry Death Leads to a Long Dead Friend ", the body of Frances Dawson Hamilton, 70, was discovered by police after she had frozen to death in her home. Even more shocking was the discovery of a second body, that of Bernard J. Kelly, 84, in an upstairs bedroom. Kelly had apparently been dead for about two years, based on the last sighting by neighbors. The body was found in a twin bed, clothed in long johns and socks and draped with rosary beads and palm fronds. There were also two boxes of Valentine's Day candy beside the body. Hamilton had apparently been sleeping beside Kelly as a second bed had been pushed up alongside his deathbed. (1. Kirsner, 119) (2. Pothier)