Isolation Vs Isolation

1568 Words4 Pages

In a society of concrete forests and iron oceans, some people seek solitude instead of intimacy. It may seem strange how people will choose solitude over interacting with other people, but the reasons behind this phenomenon could be analyzed from many different standpoints. Before attempting to approach this question as a whole, the first step to take is to divide our population into people developed and developing countries. From a psychological standpoint, the reasons for isolation could be the result of a fixation in some of the psychosocial stages. In developing countries, the need for a workforce is high, thus the majority of people are concerned about generativity vs. stagnation. As the countries require the population to work to advance and feed themselves, many people choose to work, or generativity …show more content…

Meanwhile, in developed countries, the basic needs are well provided for the population, thus the percentage of people who choose stagnation will significantly increase. To explain how this phenomenon contributes to choice of solitude, there has been a study done that proves that people who choose to be stagnant are more likely to be inclined to choose isolation in the next psychosocial stage, intimacy vs. isolation. Research has shown that while engaging in the process of intimacy, the work production rate will increase by a multifold. On the other hand, if one decisively identifies his or her’s lifestyle as one of isolation, the production rate will show no sign of increase, and may decrease. Concluding from this study, it could be said that intimacy creates a secondary drive to put people in optimal arousal to engage in work production. As the Yerkes-Dodson law states, there must be an offset to regress one’s maximum arousal towards the optimal arousal level to perform best.

Open Document