Is Napoleon A Tyrant Or A Hero?

204 Words1 Page

I would argue that Napoleon is a tyrant and not a hero because of the way the ruled France. Napoleon is responsible for the deaths of countless amounts of people through wars and battles that he put France through. Wars and battles such as the Battle of Waterloo, the Battle of Austerlitz and the Battle of Borodino had a big impact on France's population and the economy. Speaking about battles, even though people can argue that he was a fantastic military leader, he wasn't very great when he fled and abandoned his fellow troops in Egypt and Russia. Not only is Napoleon responsible for the deaths of hundreds of troops and for fleeing a war because things got too bad, he is also to blame for pushing France into a deeper bankruptcy. He agreed to

Show More
Related

  • Napoleon

    638 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nationalism is the devotion of people to the interests of its nation or the love of one's country to stay independent. Nationalism played a major role in the downfall of Napoleon in that he wanted an empire and his opponent's wanted independence.

    Read More

  • Napoleon Historiography

    1657 Words  | 4 Pages

    An Historiography Review of Napoleon failed invasion of Russia using Clausewitz and Theodore Evault Dodge books

    Read More

  • Use Of Artifice In Empire Of Illusion By Chris Hedges

    629 Words  | 2 Pages

    During his rule, Napoleon called himself an emperor, but he acted like the kings before him. The French Revolution stood against the idea of one leader with all authority over one country and promoted liberty, equality, and fraternity. The French citizens did not glorify Napoleon as a king because he gave his people sovereignty over political situations. He used plebiscites or voting to spread equality, however, the majority was always in favor of Napoleon. This happened due to fear because he was the strongest man in Europe at the time. He idolized himself as a hero, saving the French people from the

    Read More

  • DBQ On Napoleon Bonaparte's Rule In France

    673 Words  | 2 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte ruled in France from 1789 to 1815. Napoleon came to power in 1789 and immediately became a powerful figure in the French government. However, some thought Napoleon was such a great leader. The Napoleonic Empire started to grow France’s territories. Some might have believed that Napoleon was too eager with his rule, while losing and failing to succeed against the power of England, in an attempt to blockade their trade, and of Russia, where he led his army to a defeat and retreat back to France. Even in his success over Spain, the battle still costed Napoleon and his army in men and resources. Napoleon was mostly viewed as a powerful and militaristic leader in some aspects, but others saw him as a coward and terrible leader in other ways.

    Read More

  • Mid term exam

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    In other ways Napoleon was also the savior of the French Revolution: he fought wars and won most as an attempt to try and unite Europe under one French Empire. Even though this eventually failed, French nationalism and pride emerged in its aftermath. Napoleons also regulated the economy to control prices, encouraged new industry and build roads and canals, built schools, and abolished privilege, leading towards benefaction towards centralizing the state. In his entirety as a ruler, Napoleon did more to help the French people than to hurt them. For these reasons Napoleon was the savior of the French Revolution: he transformed his power and strength into benefits towards his people, creating and bringing the change France needed during and after the Revolution to help its people.

    Read More

  • Orientalism Was Used Back In The 19th Century

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    Orientalism was used back in the 19th century to imitate or depict others nations and their cultures. The Europeans would take impressive feats of architecture or objects from other nations to create their own “better” version. They used orientalism to show how other nations were barbaric and that they were vastly more intelligent. These tactics can be seen in many paintings and buildings where they tried to improve upon other nations works. In some of theses paintings you can see upperclassmen wearing lavish clothes or in other cases black people serving the europeans and being underneath them. Other orientalist artists will take ordinary objects and make them more european by adding expansive material and artwork. Additionally, artists will

    Read More

  • Was Andrew Carnegie A Hero Or Anti Hero?

    694 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie, an inventor, philosopher, and entrepreneur, helped create the age of industrialization; also known as the Gilded Age. With his steel, he turned the U.S from an agricultural and commercial nation to an industrial nation. Being one of the forward-thinking men of his time, he helped cities expand bringing urbanization. Although many people consider him a hero, he is considered an antagonist because of his atrocious working conditions coupled with the long hour and the wages. So was he a hero? A hero is generally defined as someone who is admired or idealized usually for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. On the other hand, an anti-hero is someone who lacks the traits of a traditional hero but still has the greater good of the people in mind. Though Carnegie did the best he could for the people of the future, I cannot say the same for the people of his time. Andrew Carnegie is in between a hero and a villain; he is an anti-hero.

    Read More

  • Napoleon Bonaparte as One of the Greatest Military Leaders of all Time

    1263 Words  | 3 Pages

    Napoleon Bonaparte as One of the Greatest Military Leaders of all Time Napoleon Bonaparte is considered one of the greatest military leaders of all time. His victories were decisive, powerful and brought greatness to a suffering France. His military power reigned supreme for over fifteen years until the drive that got him to where he was brought him to ruin. The question that I am plagued by is; How was Napoleon able to win almost every battle so decisively? His forces were often out numbered and out supplied but some how Napoleon was still able to defeat the opposing forces.

    Read More

  • Why Is Napoleon Bad

    429 Words  | 1 Pages

    But his flaws do not negate all the good that he did. Napoleon’s Civil Code is still in use today. I won’t get into specifics on the Napoleonic Code, but they obviously did a lot of good for France and, by extension, the entire world. Napoleon transformed a frantic France, still reeling from the aftermath of the French Revolution, into a thriving country. I think it is safe to say that France was a collectively better place during the Napoleonic Era than it had been in the time directly before it. He gave the people the freedom to choose their own religion in a society that had, for so long, been told what to do and what to worship by the

    Read More

  • Why Is Napoleon Bonaparte Considered A Tyrant

    557 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are theories that Napoleon’s men shot the nose off the Sphinx. Napoleon Bonaparte was born in Corsica and trained as a military officer. He became a commander fighting in Italy. In 1799, he staged a coup d'état and made himself the leader. Five years later, he crowned himself Emperor.

    Read More

  • Napoleon - an enlightened despot

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    Enlightened despotism is when there is an absolute ruler, in some cases a tyrant, who follows the principles of the Enlightenment through reforms. Permitting religious toleration, allowing freedom of the press and speech, and expanding education are a few main guidelines to being and enlightened despot. Napoleon I is often referred to as one of the greatest enlightened despots. Although, he did not follow the ideas of the enlightenment entirely, he managed his country in a way that he maintained complete authority as well as many of the gains of the French Revolution. Yes, Napoleon did want to do a few things for himself, but he also ruled for the majority in most cases, promote government-funded education, and supported many other enlightened ideas. But, most importantly, Napoleon did what he thought would make his country stronger.

    Read More

  • In what ways was Napoleon a warrior overloard in his Treatment of his subjects?

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    The question asks what was Napoleons treatment of his European subjects. However first we need to learn what these subjects were and distinguish the differences between them.

    Read More

  • Was Napoleon Bonaparte the Saviour or the Destroyer of the Ideals of the French Revolution?

    1926 Words  | 4 Pages

    Certain individuals approved of Napoleon's reign as the saviour of France. He finished and completed the Revolution by fulfilling the ideals the people of France demanded. A person such as one belonging to the bourgeoisie, or even a peasant would be very satisfied with the way Napoleon ruled over the country. He gave them equality, freedom, justice, and many rights. Such things never existed during the reign of the monarchs before Napoleon stepped in. A banker too would be very affirmative on how Napoleon had truly helped France in its economic problems. He made the franc the most stable currency in Europe, and the banker had witnessed that, as probably one of the bankers of the Bank of France. Another type of individual that agrees that Napoleon isn't the destroyer of the ideals of the Revolution would be his soldiers and generals. He had fought alongside with his men in many battles. Through inspiration, he gained their loyalty, to "follow him to the stars" if he asked them to. Such inspiration would never be gained if he never respected them, if he never treated them fairly. And then, the "Legion of Honour", which awarded to some certain citizens for their civil and military achievements.

    Read More

  • Napoleon: Hero or Tyrant?

    1475 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...arly successes and his military brilliance classifies him as a hero in this sense. His political reign was also one of debate. Although he awarded many rights, he challenged them with other restrictions. Overall, France was stable following the horrid Reign of Terror but it also awarded more rights than in the old regime. Finally, the social aspect of France could prove Bonaparte to be either heroic or tyrannical as well. Many social changes transgressed during his reign. For instance, there was an increase in education and an end to feudalism, however Napoleon ruled the imperial catechism and was emperor for life. Overall the social changes were an improvement from the old regime, therefore classifying his as a hero for his time period. Overall, Napoleon was a hero in all three aspects of French life, although there were many aspects which were tyrannical as well.

    Read More

  • Is Macbeth A Tragic Hero Or A Tyrant?

    904 Words  | 2 Pages

    Macbeth is presented at the start of the play as a noble man, one full

    Read More

More about Is Napoleon A Tyrant Or A Hero?

Open Document