Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Attitude toward death
The perception of death
The perception of death
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction In the play Hamlet by Shakespeare, the character Hamlet faces sorrows and tribulations after he finds out his father has died to the new king, Claudius. This series of events leads Hamlet to adopt a way of thinking that leads to characters thinking he is insane. However, Hamlet’s emotions do not inhibit his ability to reason enough to be considered “insane” at the times of murder. The Prosecution accuses Hamlet with manslaughter of Polonius and second degree murder of King Claudius.
Manslaughter The first murder was against Polonius in Act 3 Scene 4 when Hamlet’s mother calls for help. Polonius reveals his location behind the curtain and is then stabbed by Hamlet’s rapier. Arizona Rule 13-1103 states that manslaughter is when someone recklessly kills another individual. This rashness is identified by the Queen Gertrude on line 33 of the same act: “O, what a rash and bloody deed is this!” Hamlet then acknowledges he killed Polonius by stating “A bloody deed.” Both Hamlet and Gertrude recognize the quick, reckless decision Hamlet has made. Therefore, Hamlet
…show more content…
Even Polonius realizes this in Act 2 Scene 2 on line 223: “Though this be madness, yet there is / method in ‘t.” In the first part, Polonius has the preconceived notion that Hamlet is mad. Even with this preconceived idea, he still realizes that Hamlet has a method to his responses.
Method can also be shown with Hamlet’s famous speech To be or not to be. Some even consider this to be the most objective speech Hamlet has in the entire play (Uffelman, 2008). In this speech, Hamlet questions nobility. He compares “[taking] arms against a sea of troubles” and “to die, to sleep—No more.” In these quotes, Hamlet compares which is nobler: taking action or doing nothing. Hamlet shows a clear mind as he talks through the right thing to do. Insanity is the lack of this
Hamlet is grounded in logic throughout the entire play. His logic is more blatant than the average man’s, therefore confusing some of the other characters. Rather than stating something profound in response to when Polonius asks what Hamlet is reading, he says only the most obvious and elementary of answers possible, “words, words, words” (2.2.192). This trend between Polonius and Hamlet continues. “What is the matter my lord?” asks Polonius. Hamlet answers, “Between who?” (2.2.193-194). Tenney Davis responds to this by saying that Hamlet feigned his insanity convincingly by taking things too literally, which manifested in a desire to “split hairs” (Davis 630). Hamlet was always annoyed with Polonius and his garrulous speeches, but reacted not in an irrational way, but to the contrary, with the most simple, though rude, coherent answers. If Hamlet were truly mad, he would not have been able to give make such a guileless and processed ...
In Shakespeare’s play Hamlet the main character Hamlet experiences many different and puzzling emotions. He toys with the idea of killing himself and then plays with the idea of murdering others. Many people ask themselves who or what is this man and what is going on inside his head. The most common question asked about him is whether or not he is sane or insane. Although the door seems to swing both ways many see him as a sane person with one thought on his mind, and that is revenge. The first point of his sanity is while speaking with Horatio in the beginning of the play, secondly is the fact of his wittiness with the other characters and finally, his soliloquy.
nbsp; Some of the characters themselves come to realize that Hamlet is not to be mad at. Claudius confesses that Hamlet's "actions, although strange, do not appear to stem from madness. " III, i. In addition, Polonius admits that.
Similarly, in another scene, he is able to tell Polonius his true feelings through his guise. Upon Polonius deciding to ?take leave? of Hamlet, Hamlet replies, ?You cannot, take from me anything that I will more willingly part withal (2.2.233).? Furthermore, Hamlet uses his madness as almost an excuse, and definitely part of his apology, towards Laertes for his murdering of Polonious. Would a madman be able realize he was mad and call his actions uncontrollable? Were it not for his ?madness? he would have been reprimanded rather than feared, pitied, or ignored. Hamlet?s madness redirects attention away from what he is thinking about his father?s death, and puts it on why he has gone insane. This allows only himself to know what he is truly thinking, does not require him to answer any questions as to why he might be acting strange, a...
So he had reason to be suspicious when he heard a noise from behind a curtain. It was of course Hamlet's fault that he had stabbed Polonius, but Hamlet wasn't aware that it was Polonius. He thought that it was Claudius getting ready to pull a knife on him, so as self-defense, Hamlet killed him. Polonius was just mistaken for the King. He was simply in the wrong place, at the wrong time.
In act three, he even admits that his actions are insane, horrible and evil. He says, “I essentially am not in madness, but mad in craft” (3.4.191). For Hamlet to admit that his actions are mad or insane, is the most insane trait of Hamlet. For him to openly admit that he is fully aware that his actions are mad, only ignites the flame of his insanity. This quote seals the deal for the reader that Hamlets mind is a wasteland of madness, but also of planned insanity and horrible actions.
From the beginning of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, most of the action involves is cerebral. The play is confine to Hamlet’s thoughts on his life in court. Stemming a questionable situation, as one can never be sure about Hamlet’s insanity is actual or artificial. This is mainly contributed by Hamlet’s interpretation of events being the dominating voice of the play. As the play constantly piques the audience interest to take on the obligation to validate Hamlet’s means of vengeance throughout the play whether Hamlet is loyal to his father to kill Claudius with evidence and proof, or rather he has actually gone insane to escape from the truth. This ambiguous effect in the play could alter the overall view of the play, as the former is sinning for love of his father and the latter for insanity that would deteriorate his means of revenge.
This may be the case, however, it overlooks the fact that Prince Hamlet in some way had something to do with all the deaths. In Act III, Scene IV of Hamlet, Polonius hides behind the curtains in Gertrude’s room when Hamlet arrives. Hamlet first kills Polonius with his sword,
Following the performance of “The Mousetrap”, Hamlet is summoned to his mother's chamber. Upon arguing with Gertrude over the intentions of his play, and his reasons for wanting to distress the king so openly, Hamlet kills Polonius. “How now? A rat? Dead for a ducat, dead (III.iv.27-28)! Perhaps Hamlet did not know whom he was killing. “Thou wretched, rash, intruding fool, farewell! / I took thee for thy better”(III.iv.38-39)! Perhaps Hamlet thought he was killing the king.
As explained by Philip Edwards, a Fellow of the Shakespeare Institute in Shakespeare Survey 36 of Tragic Balance in Hamlet, “by killing Polonius Hamlet unwittingly takes his own life.” Polonius is his first true kill, an act which brings rise to a new level of violence and vengeance and culminates in the bloody end. This is a turning point in character development, his first step on the path of becoming a cold-blooded killer. He later shows some regret: “I do repent: but heaven hath pleased it so to punish me with this and this with me” (3.4.2630-2631) but having introduced himself to murder, it is a necessary step in ensuring his uncle meets the same
(2.2.205-208) Polonius is surprised when Hamlet does not recognize him but thinks he is a fishmonger instead. He believes Hamlet is crazy in love. Polonius says to himself, “Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t- will you walk out of the air, my Lord?” (2.2.223-224) Polonius tells himself that Hamlet talks a good talk, but many crazy people do. Many have a way with words.
Hamlet had already committed murder in his heart then later with his hands. Just as his uncle had killed Hamlet's Father Hamlet desired to kill his uncle. When Hamlet shows his true intentions, he proves that he is not a hero, and that he is no better than his uncle. Blinded by his rage, Hamlet confronts his mother and during the conversation accidentally kills Polonius. However, instead of showing remorse, he continues to berate his mother for sleeping with his uncle; after he just killed a man.
The Prince’s Madness Hamlet is a shakespearean tragedy written by William Shakespeare. The play follows Hamlet, prince of Denmark, who is the topic of debate for many different arguments. One well known topic of debate is the condition of his mental state. Critics have each argued of Hamlet being insane, and of Hamlet not being insane. This paper sides with the critics who do indeed claim that Hamlet is insane.
Hamlet will do anything at this point to get a reaction from his uncle Claudius. One of the prominent moments in Hamlet’s road to insanity is when Polonius is hiding behind a curtain, and Hamlet stabs him. Not only is Hamlet scaring his mother, Gertrude in this scene, “Gertrude: And how are you doing, staring into the empty air and talking to nobody? Your eyes give away your wild thoughts, and your hair is standing upright, like soldiers during a call to arms. Oh my dear son, calm yourself and cool off your overheated mind!
Throughout Shakespeare’s play, revenge intertwines to bring about the deaths of most of the main characters. Hamlet’s course of revenge initiates the first fatality when Polonius gets caught spying on him and Gertrude (III. iv. 24-25). By pursuing revenge, Hamlet killing Polonius paves the way for more lives to be lost. Claudius sees the murder as an opportunity to eliminate Hamlet, because Laertes’s obsession with revenge leaves him vulnerable. Laertes’s and Hamlet’s revenge lead to the deaths of Gertrude, Laertes, Claudius, and finally Hamlet (V. ii. 287-357). The revenge of each character ironically ended their own life. By acting upon revenge and having inimical intentions, the individuals brought fatalities that were unnecessary.