Introverts Susan Cain Analysis

703 Words2 Pages

The power of introverts: should society rethink their attitude towards introverted people? Susan Cain, a book author, attorney and a self-described introvert, tries to convince her audience in a passionate talk of the qualities and abilities of introverts. “In a society where extroverted and outgoing persons are in great demand, introverts don’t have an easy life.” claims Susan Cain in her passionate talk at the TED conference in February 2012. For her, the encouragement of introverted people and the awareness that neither reserved, nor extroverted behaviour is the only way, are the most important issues she wants to emphasize. According to her, there are still a lot of people who have to suffer a different kind of treatment because of …show more content…

“Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking” was published on January 24th in 2012, and took her 7 years to write. “I do believe that everyone carries along his or her own suitcase, which was said to be a metaphor for the treasures, memories and thoughts that make you actually you.” Cain explains. In her case the suitcase is filled with …show more content…

“The main problem”, so Cain, “is the design of our institutions such as school-systems or workplaces, for instance. They are designed mostly for extroverts. Especially nowadays, when group-working assignments have become more and more important, introvert kids or colleagues are seen as problem-cases in class. Although introverted persons in leadership positions often deliver better outcomes than extroverts.” According to Cain, some good examples may be “Eleanor Roosevelt, Mahatma Ghandi, Charles Darwin, and many others who had altogether no pleasure to being looked at and have all been very introverted personalities.” But it’s a fact that social group-dynamics make it very difficult for introverted people to bring through their ideas and opinions, and that especially western societies have always preferred leaders with extroverted nature. But Susan once again reminds the audience that the most dominant or charismatic person may not have the best ideas or acquired knowledge to make important decisions concerning all members of a group. Furthermore she explains: “Most people are somewhere in-between those two extremes, of course tending to one side. The correct term for this people is “ambivert” and according to her, “ambiverts definitely get the best of both

Open Document