Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes of genocide
Causes of genocide in general
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Causes of genocide
Brady Wooten May 5, 2014 Mrs. Langerman English III 3A Genocide: Why We Shouldn’t Intervene During World War II, Hitler wanted to get rid of Jews, and committed genocide by killing more than six million. This is a tragedy and the world would be a better place if people were not doing this. Genocide is a horrible event, and many innocent lives can be lost. However, the United States should not intervene in genocide in foreign countries, because it can possibly hurt both countries involved, we don’t have the authority to intervene, and we possibly might not be wanted there. One reason why the US shouldn’t intervene in genocide happening in other countries is because both countries can be hurt by it in many different ways, such as physically and even economically. In dozens of Washington post interviews with the Iraqi people, their attitude towards the United States intervention isn’t what would have been thought. They said “their lives were safer and more prosperous under Hussein and that the U.S. invasion was not worth the price both countries have paid (Sullivan 2).” If this is the case why would we interfere where we are not needed or wanted. Which is a waste of a lot of the U.S.’s money for no reason and possibly lives. A New York Times article also said “. . . The worst thing in Darfur would be an Iraq style intervention. That would almost certainly spread the civil war to other parts of Sudan.” If this is correct, then why would the U.S. intervene with something were they would do more harm than good, and put more lives in danger than there already is. The U.S. should not intervene because we can ultimately hurt both countries. Another reason why the U.S. should not intervene is that we do not have the authority or righ... ... middle of paper ... ... of the possible harm of both countries, we don’t have the right to do so, and we may not be wanted there. Above all, this is a horrible occurrence in our world’s society; however, that doesn’t mean that we have to intervene and put some of our own people in danger. Work Cited Page ProQuest Staff. "At Issue: Genocide." ProQuest LLC. 2014: n.pag. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 01 May. 2014. Goldberg, Jeffrey. "As Iran Talks Genocide, Obama Needs Courage." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 06 Sep. 2012: A.7. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 01 May. 2014. Mamdani, Mahmood. "Genocide or Civil War?." American Conservative Vol. 6 No. 14. 16 Jul. 2007: 19-22. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 01 May. 2014. Watanabe, Teresa. "Crisis in Yugoslavia: NATO Campaign Poses Moral Dilemma for..." Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, CA). 04 Apr. 1999: A17. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 01 May. 2014.
Stanton, Gregory H. "Genocides and Conflicts." World Without Genocide. World Without Genocide, 7 May 2013. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. .
United Nations. Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide. Office of the Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide. New York: , 2010. Web. .
contributed to helping this Genocide as well. This is because the U.S. was the first to tell the world that what was happening in Darfur was a genocide. On September 9, 2004, the United States secretary of State Colin Powell announced the genocide (World Without Genocide). The was the day when many came to know about the harsh reality that people in Darfur have to face. The bystanders of this genocide would notice how horrible the genocide is, but may not do much about it. There will be some that will but many will just ignore it probably. Since nothing bad is happening to themselves then they aren’t worrying
Intervening in countries facing genocide costs hundreds of millions of dollars. History clearly shows the cost to intervene, take WWII for example or the Rwanda genocide, or the Somali genocide. All of these genocides costs interventionists $400 million or more, “ Each of the more than 220 Tomahawk missiles fired by the U.S. military into Libya, for example, cost around $1.4 million… Spent between $280,000 and $700,000 for each Somali saved” (Valentino). $280,000 is a ton of money to save one person, and given these high costs, it could cost up to $7 million dollars to save ten people. They are not saving that many lives by deciding to intervene either, “Scholars have estimated that the military mission there probably saved between 10,000 and 25,000 lives,”(Valentino). 10,000-25,000 lives and the U.S. spent $7 billion to intervene
The first reason the holocaust should be considered an example of genocide is based on the UN’s definition of genocide. In the treaty by the UN titled “ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”, they explain the punishment of genocide, stating that genocide is illegal. According to the
The idea of intervention is either favoured or in question due to multiple circumstances where intervening in other states has had positive or negative outcomes. The General Assembly was arguing the right of a state to intervene with the knowledge that that state has purpose for intervention and has a plan to put forth when trying to resolve conflicts with the state in question. The GA argues this because intervention is necessary. This resolution focuses solely on the basis of protection of Human Rights. The General Assembly recognizes that countries who are not super powers eventually need intervening. They do not want states to do nothing because the state in question for intervening will continue to fall in the hands of corruption while nothing gets done. The GA opposed foreign intervention, but with our topic it points out that intervention is a necessity when the outcome could potentially solve conflicts and issues. In many cases intervention is necessary to protect Human Rights. For instance; several governments around the world do not privilege their citizens with basic Human Rights. These citizens in turn rely on the inter...
...rime of Genocide." "A Problem from Hell": America and the Age of Genocide. New York: Perennial, 2003. 62-63. Print.
Percival, Valerie, and Thomas Homer-Dixon. "Getting Rwanda wrong. (genocide in Rwanda)." Saturday Night. v110. n7 (Sept 1995): p47(3). Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. K12 Trial Site. 12 Apr. 2010 .
To start off with, what is genocide? Genocide is the killing of a massive number of people of in a group. Genocide has not only been practices in the present day, but it has been practiced for m...
They don't want to send their troops or help with food and necessities because of the possible financial impact to their own country. However, once the people committing the genocide multiply and pose a threat to more countries, the international community must help in order to prevent the genocide from entering their own countries. The world didn't get involved in both the Holocaust and the Bosnian genocide until the German empire and the Serbs in Bosnia, respectively, became very powerful and dangerous to the surrounding areas. The only way to prevent genocide is to destroy it on impact and not wait for six million to perish senselessly.
"Eight Stages of Genocides." Genocides and Conflicts. William Mitchell College of Law, 2012. Web. 15 Apr. 2014. .
Springer, Jane. Genocide: A Groundwork Guide. Toronto, Ontario: Groundwood Books / House of Anansi Press, 2006. (Accessed March 7, 2014).
SAINATI, TATIANA E. "Toward A Comparative Approach To The Crime Of Genocide." Duke Law Journal 62.1 (2012): 161-202. Academic Search Premier. Web. 25 Nov. 2013
As such, the great moral responsibility to protect innocent life must compel the United States to act when it can to do to. However, justified moral outrage for the horrors of genocide must be tempered with a prudent strategy that ensures that the United States neither oversteps its bounds nor commits itself to an ineffective, unduly risky campaign. By using nonviolent tools of statecraft, the U.S. can seek to prevent genocide without having to commit troops. By following strict standards of behavior for implementing a military intervention, the U.S. can minimize risk to itself in addition to saving lives. By staying engaged in the post-conflict nation, the U.S. can foster stability and ensure that the lives saved stay saved. Perhaps, instead of Americans joining “the ranks of the unreasonable”, the “unreasonable” can offer reason to compliment their
Print. The. Hymowitz, Sarah, and Amelia Parker. " Lessons - The Genocide Teaching Project - Center for Human Rights & Humanitarian Law." American University, Washington College of Law. American UniversityWashington College of Law Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 2011.