Interrogation Vs Interview Analysis

1190 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Interrogation vs interview

Many people believe that during an investigation interviews and interrogations have the same definition in meaning. Reid (2012) stated “A concept we teach in our basic course, is if you’re going to interview, interview. If you’re going to interrogate, interrogate,” meaning there is a significant distinct difference between the two that we must understand in order to receive an accurate and successful investigation. They can be compared in some aspects but are seen as two different approaches during an investigation. During an investigation they use different tactics to obtain information on certain aspects and involvement of a crime, which leads to the difference between an interview and interrogation. During an interview police officers, or …show more content…

Conducting an interview allows a way for investigators and police officers to determine whether or not they can trust the suspect and his credibility. It’s more so investigative rather than accusing, whereas interrogation is targeting and questioning people who are suspected as committing the crime or involvement in a specific crime. During an interrogation the goal is to find the truth, which can also lead to confessions. An interrogation is used as a tactic to encourage a person that is being interrogated to come clean and tell the truth. The interrogation process is used to give in detail to the suspect what investigators have knowledge of dealing with the suspect’s involvement in the crime. This tactic is used to encourage the person that is being interrogated to tell the truth. . The overall purpose of interrogation and interviewing is to complete the investigation. The main reason behind interviewing is to get a better understanding of the involvement in a crime, and get leads to identify anyone who is suspected of committing the crime. While the main goal of interrogation is to find the truth, receive facts and find the people responsible for the …show more content…

They also state that things such as age, lack of vocabulary, short attention spans and many more create challenges for investigators during the interview phase (Orthmann & Hess, 2013, p. 369). When dealing with children many investigators have to make sure they do not overwhelm the child. Being young at a certain age and having to answer certain questions about family members, or crimes that has happened to or in front of them can be hard and overwhelming for a child. Investigators also deal with children’s short attention span. Orthmann and Hess also state that “because young children have a short attention span, fact-finding interviews should last no more than 15 or 20 minutes” (2013, p. 365). This shows that it can be very difficult to complete interviews and receive accurate information due to a child’s short attention span. It can be easy for children to get off track or simply forget questions asked by the investigator. The hardest challenge investigators face is creating a comfortable atmosphere for the child to open up to. Many children are afraid to talk to authorities or investigators because they are strangers, and sometimes don’t want to expose information about a relative or family member, that they are very close to. It can be very difficult. Another difficult problem that investigators

Show More
Related

  • Child Eyewitness Testimony and Its Implications in the Courtroom

    825 Words  | 2 Pages

    More than 200,000 children may be involved in the legal system in any given year, and 13,000 of these children are preschool age. Often with these cases involving young children, issues arise concerning credibility, vulnerability, and memory retrieval. Studies have shown that preschool age children are quite capable of providing accurate testimony, but they are also more vulnerable to distorting this memory and testimony. Public and professional opinion about the credibility of children as witnesses in court cases has been sharply divided. On one side, it is contended that when children disclose details of a circumstance, they must be believed, no matter what techniques were used to obtain this disclosure. For example, if a child is asked whether or not he/she was abused, and to describe this incident, we must believe that child because children cannot possibly generate a false report of their own sexual victimization. The other side depicts children as being helpless sponges ...

    Read More

  • Illegal Interview Case Study

    1829 Words  | 4 Pages

    Knowing that it is up to me to know what I am required to answer and what information I am legally protected from having to reveal. That kind of question is just one of many questions that being asked during interviews and it may seem innocent; however, if any of it make me uncomfortable or do not want to answer for any particular reason, I am not legally obligated to do so. In fact, interviews should not be asking those question in the first place because the information can cause be used to discriminate or disqualify me from being a candidate for

    Read More

  • The Forensic Interview Process in the Case of Abused Children or Children Who Have Witnessed a Violent Act

    1441 Words  | 3 Pages

    The forensic interview process happens when children have been abused or witnessed a violent act. “Every year more than 3 million reports of child abuse are made in the United States involving more than 6 million children (a report can include multiple children) (National Child Abuse Statistics).” In the United States there are about four to seven children that die every day due to child abuse and neglect (National Child Abuse Statistics). There are many different processes to conduct the interview and a number of steps are followed so children can tell their story accurately. People conducting the interview are supposed to make the child feel comfortable in their environment so they can find out what events happened.

    Read More

  • Criminal Investigations, In Custody and Miranda Warnings

    664 Words  | 2 Pages

    Discuss the differences between the terms interview and interrogation. Interviewing is talking to people, who are not suspects in a crime but who knows something and knows who is involved in the crime. Also getting their information, and asking questions to them, and knowing when to translate or interpret. The main people involved when getting information at a crime scene is the witnesses, criminal and the accuser (Orthman, Hess, 2013). Interrogation questioning of the suspects, once the suspect is known of their identity and where they reside the person who is the participant of the crime could make a statement, confession, refusal, corroborated with self-supporting documentation that could yield a guilty allegation or it could gather a determining guilt (Orthman, Hess, 2013).

    Read More

  • Actual Innocence Essay

    1941 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ofshe, Richard J., and Richard A. Leo. The Social Psychology of Police Interrogation: The Theory and Classification of True and False Confessions (1997). Web. 28 Nov. 2011.

    Read More

  • Child Development Observation

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    First of all I would like to explain why the child observation is important for social workers. It is important because it focus on the problems that arise when a child‘s situation is not taken seriously and consequently have harsh consequences for both worker and child (Climbié Report, 2002). Observation is something that leads to formation of hypotheses and gives new insights about the child’s world. Child observations assist social workers understand, through assessments, the children’s communication between them and their carer or parents. The aim of the observation is to understand the child and his/her world (Briggs, 1992).

    Read More

  • Essay On Child Interviewing

    652 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though I am aware that there have been great strides forward, especially within the past decade, in the implementation of safer and more constructive methods, in regards to child interviewing practices, I am appalled at the gross negligence of our justice system, in their failure to protect children from the brutal onslaught of such damaging interrogation. Not only does it fail to safeguard a child’s health and well-fare, but it also proves counterproductive in the gathering of reliable testimony, and so therefore does not ultimately serve the constructs of justice, either.

    Read More

  • What Are The Strengths And Weaknesses Of A Victim Interview

    1467 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most interviews require strategic planning and relevant questions to be able to gather enough information. There were many things that the detective did great for example, in the first scene when the victim and the detective walked in, he immediately asked her to sit in a comfortable chair, got her a cup of coffee and asked her if she needed anything else. He quickly proceeded to explain what the interview is going to be about, removing any doubt or apprehension that she may experience during the interview. The detective began the interview with," Don't try to remember things you can't…if you need to stop anytime, just tell me." (Victim Interview,1998). Which essentially created a rapport between the detective and the victim. The detective began the interview with an open-ended question, asking the victim to tell him what happened from the start. While the victim was talking, he did not interrupt, but was rather patient with her, nodding and making eye contact continuously. During a one point of the video, the woman began crying, unable to hide her distress, to which the investigator reacted quickly responding "No pressure, I know you are upset... Are you alright to carry on?" (Victim Interview, 1998). In my opinion, this is a great technique to use when one is dealing with an elderly victim in distress. As the investigator carefully listened, he then recapped all the information back to the victim making sure it is correct. We see this throughout the whole film, where the detective continuously seeks victim's validation. Another thing that I found interesting is the way that the investigator used the cognitive approach on the victim, to stimulate her memory. He politely asked her to draw a sketch of the area that the crime happened at, then he proceeded to make her retell everything from the beginning but in the present tense. As she was struggling, he patiently guided her, by saying "Show me", "Describe to

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Cognitive And Forensic Interviewing

    1806 Words  | 4 Pages

    For both Cognitive and Forensic interviewing, it has been found to be more effective with older children than with younger for a variety of reasons. These reasons include the natural linguistic and cognitive development of children. Older children are more likely to remember the more information about the situation they experienced through a Cognitive interview than younger children, which suggests that may be most beneficial for them. Forensic interviewing should work better with younger children than Cognitive interviewing in that it allows freedom to give unique answers and considers the child’s age and developmental level more than a Cognitive interview does. In many interviews, children with intellectual disabilities need more prompting

    Read More

  • Skills for Criminal Investigation

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. What is the difference between a. and a. Method of inquiry is based on gathering all the facts in a criminal investigation, such as physical evidence, witnesses and records (Osterburg 2010). Methods of inquiry are ways an investigator gathers the information for a particular case they are investigating. In a criminal investigation, the method of inquiry follows five simple words, who, what, when, where, and why, and lastly how. Methods of inquiry can also be very helpful when a crime scene has to be reconstructed.

    Read More

  • The Aspects of Interview and Interrogation

    2916 Words  | 6 Pages

    ...th those programs. During the interview question selecting is important. Open ended questions are good at establishing rapport and give the subject a chance to explain things in general. Closed ended questions are great at getting specific answers and details. When concluding an interview the investigator should have the subject restate everything that happened and make sure that nothing has been left out. At anytime in an interview or interrogation recognizing signs that a subject is getting closer to admitting something should be capitalized on, if not that information may never be obtained from the subject. Interrogations are slightly different from interviews but should be handled in a similar way. Showing the subject respect and treating them like a human bean is just as important in interrogations as it is in interview. Interview and interrogating is an art. It takes practice and work, but with the right techniques and experience and a positive attitude anyone can become successful at it.

    Read More

  • Child Witnesses

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    Child witnesses have provided a basis for controversy over the years in criminal justice. There are two main things that people worry about when it comes to having a child witness, one is the anxiety that is put on the child with regard to the traumatic experience and the other is dependability of the testimony. Child testimony has long been considered an important part of the case but what is to be done when there are questions regarding legal, ethical, and professional ways to interact with the children.

    Read More

  • Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    Leo, R and Ofshe R. The Social Psychology of Police Interrogation: The Theory and Classification of True and False Confessions. 16 Studies in Law, Politics and Society 189,

    Read More

  • informants

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    For my interview, I spoke with a police officer whose name I was told not to reveal. We talked about who the informants are, the use of informants, type of informants, and what they stand for.

    Read More

  • Interrogation Essay

    2706 Words  | 6 Pages

    Interrogations are a form of interviewing that has been around for a very long time throughout the world. People from fields such as police, military, and intelligence agencies have employed the technique to extract a confession or incriminating statements. Interrogations consist of an array of techniques ranging from developing a rapport and so forth. During an interrogation a suspect or eyewitness are questioned authorities. Interrogations are more frequently utilized by police officers. As seen in a plethora of popular television shows, it appears that all it takes to get a confession or information from a person is a little screaming and chairing throwing, but there is way more to interrogations. When dealing with interrogations police officers are very aware of how to elicit specific information from suspects and eyewitnesses. It is way more scientific than the eye may see, when an interrogation is occurring false memories are easily created by eyewitnesses and suspects because of leading questions and source misattributions that cause for memory errors.

    Read More

More about Interrogation Vs Interview Analysis

Open Document