Two Different Interpretations Of The New Deal

959 Words2 Pages

Interpretations of the New Deal

The two statements show two very different interpretations of the New Deal. Interpretation I is very much in favour of the New Deal, where as interpretation II is not. I will use source based information and my background knowledge to back up both of these statements and then make a conclusion based on the evidence.

Interpretation I gives much of the credit from the recovery to the New Deal, saying that "It gave them the confidence to lift the United States out of the depression". Source B directly backs up this statement, saying that one of the achievements of the New Deal was "the restoration of self-confidence". This source also mentions that the New Deal lifted …show more content…

This strongly backs up the statement in Interpretation I, which says the New Deal "helped many Americans".

Interpretation II does not support the New Deal. It says that the New Deal wasted a lot of money and made people dependant upon the government.

Source A backs up this Interpretation as it shows Roosevelt wasting money. Source A is a cartoon which holds the message "Roosevelt is wasting the tax payers money". It does this by comparing the New Deal to a broken pump, which Roosevelt is trying to fix. The broken pump does not do its job very well; taking in a lot of water but giving outlittle. In this cartoon, water is used to represent money. This cartoon backs up sveral points of Interpretation II. It shows how "The New Deal wasted a lot of money" and how "It did not solve the U.S economic problems".

Source C describes how badly the New Deal did, from a book entitled 'The Roosevelt Myth". It shows how "The New Deal wasted a lot of money" and "made people dependant on the Government" and "led to …show more content…

These two sentences alone provide good evidence to back up Interpretation II. Source C also mentions how "more people are on government relief" and "Roosevelt is calling for more power". Source C also states how the Economic problem was solved by the outbreak of WWII, not Roosevelt and the New Deal "By leading his country into war, he was able to put every man and woman into work"

Source D only shows how many people were "dependant" on government relief. It does this by showing a large group of black people queeing for relief.

Source E gives a very strong opinion and argument against the New Deal. It describes how "men lost there confidense in themselves" because Roosevelt gave them soup. It says how "welfare kills a man's initiative". This is all evidense to support Interpretation II. The man who wrote source E was a self-made business-man, who was, no-doubt, a republican. He was totally aghainst the idea of receiving help from any one, and he believed that everyone should use there

More about Two Different Interpretations Of The New Deal

Open Document