International Politics And Zombies Summary

658 Words2 Pages

Theories of International Politics and Zombies by Daniel W. Drezner, answers many questions about international relations. Drezner essentially looks at how the IR theories that we learned in class could potentially be applied to a war with zombies. Throughout the book, Drezner looks at realism, liberalism, constructivism, feminism, neoconservatism, domestic policy, bureaucratic politics, and psychological responses. How Drezner compares these international relations theories to zombies is really quite incredible. I believe that there are four international relations theories that stand out the most in this book that best describe the understanding of the “zombie threat.” They are realism, liberalism, social constructivism, and psychological …show more content…

Drezner believes that realism is perfectly comfortable in the zombie world. The threats that come from anarchy are much greater the threats of the living dead. Realists survive on power. As Thucydides was paraphrased in the book, “the weak get taken.” Regardless if it is zombies doing the capturing, the strong surpass the weak. I believe that Realism uses a good description and understanding of the zombie threat because they don’t believe that there is a considerable threat. Realists, according to Drezner, would not think that international relations would be immensely affected. He even went as far as saying that the anarchy within the international system very well may lead to a peace agreement between the zombies and some states. As frightening as conversating foreign affairs with the living dead sounds, I can still see Denzer’s assessment of …show more content…

Zombies interfere with human emotions. The response that humans have for zombies is obviously negative. Drezner says, “Zombies are often assumed to lack intelligence, but it should be noted that humans frequently respond to new undead situations with confusion and ignorance.” Drezner mentions a psychological attribute known as “hawk bias.” Hawk bias means that people have the tendency be more aggressive with their actions when faced with confrontation. When policymakers are threatened with a possible loss, they would be willing to take riskier actions to “preserve the status quo.” Hawk bias would be bad for human international relations, but possibly very successful for zombies. Drezner suggests that a policy option would be for human governments to use psychological treatments to treat the zombies. While that does sound intriguing and risky, the hope is that the zombies will not devour the humans before they are successfully

Open Document