Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath

1171 Words3 Pages

Infamy: Pearl Harbor and its Aftermath was written by John Toland, an American author and historian. He was a graduate of Williams College in Massachusetts and attended Yale School of Drama, with his primary goal of becoming a playwright. Some of his most famous books were written about the World War II Era. He won a Pulitzer Prize for his book The Rising Sun, focusing on the history of Japan during WWII from the Japanese point of view, rather than the American side. He also wrote Adolph Hitler: A Definitive Biography and Battle: The Story of the Bulge. Many of his books focused on the military, so he was quite qualified to write this book.
Infamy is the story focusing not on the actual event of Pearl Harbor, but the aftermath. Much of the focus is on many of the men who were in power in the months leading up to the attack. The book briefly covers the actual attack, and then moves on to describe the subsequent investigations made. Each investigation brought different facts to light and tried to figure out how, on the American side, this attack was allowed to happen.
John Toland’s central argument is that many of the top officials knew about the impending attack, and after the fact, tried to cover it up and place blame on others, specifically Admiral Husband Kimmel and Lieutenant General Walter Short. Toland proves this in several ways.
Firstly, according to Toland, many Japanese messages that were intercepted and decrypted were never sent to Pearl Harbor, showing that there was no way they could have been prepared for the attack. Vital messages were intercepted starting in the summer of 1941; one divided Pearl Harbor into five grids and even asked for locations of the warships and carriers. S...

... middle of paper ...

...mixed feelings about this book. On one hand, I really enjoyed learning more about what happened behind the scenes after the attack on Pearl Harbor. In school, my teachers only taught us about the war, never about what happened on our own soil. However, this book was occasionally difficult to follow. There was a very extensive list of people involved that was often hard to keep straight, especially since I did not know who many of them were. Also, before I decide whether or not I believe in his thesis completely, I would need to do some more research. I feel there must be a grain of truth behind what he says; too much happened that day, and it is hard for me to believe that no one knew something was going to happen. I would not recommend this book to anyone who was wanting to read a book for fun, but for a serious history buff, I would definitely recommend it.

Open Document